{"title":"左乳腺癌放疗中胸腹深吸气屏气选择的影响因素。","authors":"Tatsuya Mikami, Yoshitsugu Matsumoto, Yuri Toyoda, Tsuyoshi Takazawa, Yoji Nakano, Tomomi Katsumata, Toshihisa Kuroki, Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa, Ryuta Nagao, Takeshi Akiba, Akitomo Sugawara","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is used with adjuvant radiation therapy after left breast cancer surgery to reduce radiation dose to the heart. In this study we determined whether thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH) or abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) should be selected based on patient background.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy plans were created under the same conditions using free breathing (FB), T-DIBH, and A-DIBH CT scans of patients who had previously undergone treatment at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A-DIBH decreased the left lung dose compared to FB. In comparing T-DIBH and A-DIBH, the heart maximum and left lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH. The differences in the heart mean dose (Dmean) between FB, and T-DIBH and A-DIBH were correlated with the cardiothoracic ratio, heart volume, and left lung volume. The difference in the heart Dmean and the left lung dose of T-DIBH and A-DIBH correlated with the forced vital capacity (FVC).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A-DIBH is preferable over T-DIBH with respect to the heart and left lung doses; however, with respect to the heart Dmean, T-DIBH was more effective in reducing the dose in some cases, and the FVC was a relevant factor in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":38819,"journal":{"name":"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine","volume":"48 1","pages":"13-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Involved in the Choice Between Thoracic and Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath Holds During Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Mikami, Yoshitsugu Matsumoto, Yuri Toyoda, Tsuyoshi Takazawa, Yoji Nakano, Tomomi Katsumata, Toshihisa Kuroki, Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa, Ryuta Nagao, Takeshi Akiba, Akitomo Sugawara\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is used with adjuvant radiation therapy after left breast cancer surgery to reduce radiation dose to the heart. In this study we determined whether thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH) or abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) should be selected based on patient background.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy plans were created under the same conditions using free breathing (FB), T-DIBH, and A-DIBH CT scans of patients who had previously undergone treatment at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A-DIBH decreased the left lung dose compared to FB. In comparing T-DIBH and A-DIBH, the heart maximum and left lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH. The differences in the heart mean dose (Dmean) between FB, and T-DIBH and A-DIBH were correlated with the cardiothoracic ratio, heart volume, and left lung volume. The difference in the heart Dmean and the left lung dose of T-DIBH and A-DIBH correlated with the forced vital capacity (FVC).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A-DIBH is preferable over T-DIBH with respect to the heart and left lung doses; however, with respect to the heart Dmean, T-DIBH was more effective in reducing the dose in some cases, and the FVC was a relevant factor in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"13-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors Involved in the Choice Between Thoracic and Abdominal Deep Inspiration Breath Holds During Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.
Purpose: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is used with adjuvant radiation therapy after left breast cancer surgery to reduce radiation dose to the heart. In this study we determined whether thoracic DIBH (T-DIBH) or abdominal DIBH (A-DIBH) should be selected based on patient background.
Methods: Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy plans were created under the same conditions using free breathing (FB), T-DIBH, and A-DIBH CT scans of patients who had previously undergone treatment at our hospital.
Results: A-DIBH decreased the left lung dose compared to FB. In comparing T-DIBH and A-DIBH, the heart maximum and left lung doses were significantly lower in A-DIBH. The differences in the heart mean dose (Dmean) between FB, and T-DIBH and A-DIBH were correlated with the cardiothoracic ratio, heart volume, and left lung volume. The difference in the heart Dmean and the left lung dose of T-DIBH and A-DIBH correlated with the forced vital capacity (FVC).
Conclusions: A-DIBH is preferable over T-DIBH with respect to the heart and left lung doses; however, with respect to the heart Dmean, T-DIBH was more effective in reducing the dose in some cases, and the FVC was a relevant factor in this study.
期刊介绍:
The Tokai Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, also referred to as Tokai Journal, is an official quarterly publication of the Tokai Medical Association. Tokai Journal publishes original articles that deal with issues of clinical, experimental, socioeconomic, cultural and/or historical importance to medical science and related fields. Manuscripts may be submitted as full-length Original Articles or Brief Communications. Tokai Journal also publishes reviews and symposium proceedings. Articles accepted for publication in Tokai Journal cannot be reproduced elsewhere without written permission from the Tokai Medical Association. In addition, Tokai Journal will not be held responsible for the opinions of the authors expressed in the published articles.