Mackenzie Wilson, Zachary M. van Allen, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Jamie C. Brehaut, Audrey Durand, Jean-François Lalonde, Douglas G. Manuel, Susan Michie, Robert West, Justin Presseau
{"title":"减少触摸眼睛、鼻子和嘴巴(“区域”)以减少传染病的传播:一项动机、意志和非反思性预测因素的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Mackenzie Wilson, Zachary M. van Allen, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Jamie C. Brehaut, Audrey Durand, Jean-François Lalonde, Douglas G. Manuel, Susan Michie, Robert West, Justin Presseau","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <section>\n <h3> Background</h3>\n <p>The route into the body for many pathogens is through the eyes, nose and mouth (i.e., the ‘T-zone’) via inhalation or fomite-based transfer during face touching. It is important to understand factors that are associated with touching the T-zone to inform preventive strategies.</p>\n </section>\n <section>\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n <p>To identify theory-informed predictors of intention to reduce facial ‘T-zone’ touching and self-reported ‘T-zone’ touching.</p>\n </section>\n <section>\n <h3> Methods</h3>\n <p>We conducted a nationally representative prospective questionnaire study of Canadians. Respondents were randomized to answer questions about touching their eyes, nose, or mouth with a questionnaire assessing 11 factors from an augmented Health Action Process Approach at baseline: intention, outcome expectancies, risk perception, individual severity, self-efficacy, action planning, coping planning, social support, automaticity, goal facilitation and stability of context. At 2-week follow-up, we assessed HAPA-based indicators of self-regulatory activities (awareness of standards, effort, self-monitoring) and self-reported behaviour (primary dependent variable).</p>\n </section>\n <section>\n <h3> Results</h3>\n <p>Of 656 Canadian adults recruited, 569 responded to follow-up (87% response rate). Across all areas of the ‘T-zone’, outcome expectancy was the strongest predictor of intention to reduce facial ‘T-zone’ touching, while self-efficacy was a significant predictor for only the eyes and mouth. Automaticity was the strongest predictor of behaviour at the 2-week follow-up. No sociodemographic or psychological factors predicted behaviour, with the exception of self-efficacy, which negatively predicted eye touching.</p>\n </section>\n <section>\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n <p>Findings suggest that focusing on reflective processes may increase intention to reduce ‘T-zone’ touching, while reducing actual ‘T-zone’ touching may require strategies that address the automatic nature of this behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"28 4","pages":"893-913"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12660","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing touching eyes, nose and mouth (‘T-zone’) to reduce the spread of infectious disease: A prospective study of motivational, volitional and non-reflective predictors\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie Wilson, Zachary M. van Allen, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Jamie C. Brehaut, Audrey Durand, Jean-François Lalonde, Douglas G. Manuel, Susan Michie, Robert West, Justin Presseau\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <section>\\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n <p>The route into the body for many pathogens is through the eyes, nose and mouth (i.e., the ‘T-zone’) via inhalation or fomite-based transfer during face touching. It is important to understand factors that are associated with touching the T-zone to inform preventive strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n <section>\\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n <p>To identify theory-informed predictors of intention to reduce facial ‘T-zone’ touching and self-reported ‘T-zone’ touching.</p>\\n </section>\\n <section>\\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n <p>We conducted a nationally representative prospective questionnaire study of Canadians. Respondents were randomized to answer questions about touching their eyes, nose, or mouth with a questionnaire assessing 11 factors from an augmented Health Action Process Approach at baseline: intention, outcome expectancies, risk perception, individual severity, self-efficacy, action planning, coping planning, social support, automaticity, goal facilitation and stability of context. At 2-week follow-up, we assessed HAPA-based indicators of self-regulatory activities (awareness of standards, effort, self-monitoring) and self-reported behaviour (primary dependent variable).</p>\\n </section>\\n <section>\\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n <p>Of 656 Canadian adults recruited, 569 responded to follow-up (87% response rate). Across all areas of the ‘T-zone’, outcome expectancy was the strongest predictor of intention to reduce facial ‘T-zone’ touching, while self-efficacy was a significant predictor for only the eyes and mouth. Automaticity was the strongest predictor of behaviour at the 2-week follow-up. No sociodemographic or psychological factors predicted behaviour, with the exception of self-efficacy, which negatively predicted eye touching.</p>\\n </section>\\n <section>\\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n <p>Findings suggest that focusing on reflective processes may increase intention to reduce ‘T-zone’ touching, while reducing actual ‘T-zone’ touching may require strategies that address the automatic nature of this behaviour.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"893-913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12660\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12660\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reducing touching eyes, nose and mouth (‘T-zone’) to reduce the spread of infectious disease: A prospective study of motivational, volitional and non-reflective predictors
Background
The route into the body for many pathogens is through the eyes, nose and mouth (i.e., the ‘T-zone’) via inhalation or fomite-based transfer during face touching. It is important to understand factors that are associated with touching the T-zone to inform preventive strategies.
Purpose
To identify theory-informed predictors of intention to reduce facial ‘T-zone’ touching and self-reported ‘T-zone’ touching.
Methods
We conducted a nationally representative prospective questionnaire study of Canadians. Respondents were randomized to answer questions about touching their eyes, nose, or mouth with a questionnaire assessing 11 factors from an augmented Health Action Process Approach at baseline: intention, outcome expectancies, risk perception, individual severity, self-efficacy, action planning, coping planning, social support, automaticity, goal facilitation and stability of context. At 2-week follow-up, we assessed HAPA-based indicators of self-regulatory activities (awareness of standards, effort, self-monitoring) and self-reported behaviour (primary dependent variable).
Results
Of 656 Canadian adults recruited, 569 responded to follow-up (87% response rate). Across all areas of the ‘T-zone’, outcome expectancy was the strongest predictor of intention to reduce facial ‘T-zone’ touching, while self-efficacy was a significant predictor for only the eyes and mouth. Automaticity was the strongest predictor of behaviour at the 2-week follow-up. No sociodemographic or psychological factors predicted behaviour, with the exception of self-efficacy, which negatively predicted eye touching.
Conclusion
Findings suggest that focusing on reflective processes may increase intention to reduce ‘T-zone’ touching, while reducing actual ‘T-zone’ touching may require strategies that address the automatic nature of this behaviour.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.