连续血液滤过过程中泰德唑胺去除不良:体外连续血液滤过模型实验。

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Satoshi Yoshikawa, Shinichi Yoshikawa, Akira Sato, Tsukasa Matsumoto
{"title":"连续血液滤过过程中泰德唑胺去除不良:体外连续血液滤过模型实验。","authors":"Satoshi Yoshikawa, Shinichi Yoshikawa, Akira Sato, Tsukasa Matsumoto","doi":"10.1186/s40780-023-00307-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone anti-MRSA drug with included in the National Health Insurance Drug Price List in 2018. The effect of hemodialysis on tedizolid phosphate concentrations has been reported; pre-dialysis concentrations decreased by 10% compared to post- dialysis concentrations. However, the material of the dialysis membrane remains unknown. In addition, there have been no reports on the effects of continuous hemodiafiltration. In this study, we investigated the effects of continuous hemodiafiltration on tedizolid using two types of dialysis membranes made of different materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The adsorption of tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin to two different dialysis membranes was investigated, and the clearance of each drug was calculated by experiments using an in vitro continuous hemodiafiltration model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adsorption of tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin on the dialysis membranes was examined, and no adsorption was observed. Experimental results from the continuous hemodiafiltration model showed that linezolid and vancomycin concentrations decreased over time: after two hours, the respective decreases were 26.48 ± 7.14% and 28.51 ± 2.32% for polysulfone membranes, respectively. The decrease was 23.57 ± 4.95% and 28.73 ± 5.13% for the polymethylmethacrylate membranes, respectively. These results suggested that linezolid and vancomycin were eliminated by continuous hemodiafiltration. In contrast, tedizolid phosphate and tedizolid concentrations decreased slightly in the polysulfone and polymethylmethacrylate membranes. The decrease in concentrations were 2.10 ± 0.77% and 2.97 ± 0.60% for the polysulfone membranes, respectively. For the polymethylmethacrylate membranes, the decrease in concentration were 2.01 ± 0.88% and 1.73 ± 0.27%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggested that tedizolid should not be considered for dose control during continuous hemodiafiltration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poor removal of tedizolid during continuous hemodiafiltration: experiments using an in vitro continuous hemodiafiltration model.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Yoshikawa, Shinichi Yoshikawa, Akira Sato, Tsukasa Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40780-023-00307-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone anti-MRSA drug with included in the National Health Insurance Drug Price List in 2018. The effect of hemodialysis on tedizolid phosphate concentrations has been reported; pre-dialysis concentrations decreased by 10% compared to post- dialysis concentrations. However, the material of the dialysis membrane remains unknown. In addition, there have been no reports on the effects of continuous hemodiafiltration. In this study, we investigated the effects of continuous hemodiafiltration on tedizolid using two types of dialysis membranes made of different materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The adsorption of tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin to two different dialysis membranes was investigated, and the clearance of each drug was calculated by experiments using an in vitro continuous hemodiafiltration model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adsorption of tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin on the dialysis membranes was examined, and no adsorption was observed. Experimental results from the continuous hemodiafiltration model showed that linezolid and vancomycin concentrations decreased over time: after two hours, the respective decreases were 26.48 ± 7.14% and 28.51 ± 2.32% for polysulfone membranes, respectively. The decrease was 23.57 ± 4.95% and 28.73 ± 5.13% for the polymethylmethacrylate membranes, respectively. These results suggested that linezolid and vancomycin were eliminated by continuous hemodiafiltration. In contrast, tedizolid phosphate and tedizolid concentrations decreased slightly in the polysulfone and polymethylmethacrylate membranes. The decrease in concentrations were 2.10 ± 0.77% and 2.97 ± 0.60% for the polysulfone membranes, respectively. For the polymethylmethacrylate membranes, the decrease in concentration were 2.01 ± 0.88% and 1.73 ± 0.27%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggested that tedizolid should not be considered for dose control during continuous hemodiafiltration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00307-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00307-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Tedizolid是一种恶唑烷类抗mrsa药物,于2018年被列入国家医保药品价格目录。血液透析对tedizolid phosphate浓度的影响已有报道;与透析后浓度相比,透析前浓度降低了10%。然而,透析膜的材料仍是未知的。此外,还没有关于持续血液滤过效果的报道。在本研究中,我们使用两种不同材料制成的透析膜,研究了持续血液滤过对泰德唑酮的影响。方法:采用体外连续血液渗滤模型,考察泰地唑胺、利奈唑胺和万古霉素在两种不同透析膜上的吸附,并通过实验计算每种药物的清除率。结果:检测了泰地唑胺、利奈唑胺和万古霉素在透析膜上的吸附,未见吸附现象。连续血液滤过模型的实验结果表明,利奈唑胺和万古霉素的浓度随着时间的推移而下降:2小时后,聚砜膜的浓度分别下降26.48±7.14%和28.51±2.32%。聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯膜的下降幅度分别为23.57±4.95%和28.73±5.13%。结果表明,利奈唑胺和万古霉素可通过持续血液滤除。相反,聚砜和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯膜中磷酸二唑酮和二唑酮浓度略有下降。聚砜膜的浓度下降幅度分别为2.10±0.77%和2.97±0.60%。聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯膜的浓度下降幅度分别为2.01±0.88%和1.73±0.27%。结论:在连续血液滤过中不应考虑使用替地唑胺进行剂量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poor removal of tedizolid during continuous hemodiafiltration: experiments using an in vitro continuous hemodiafiltration model.

Background: Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone anti-MRSA drug with included in the National Health Insurance Drug Price List in 2018. The effect of hemodialysis on tedizolid phosphate concentrations has been reported; pre-dialysis concentrations decreased by 10% compared to post- dialysis concentrations. However, the material of the dialysis membrane remains unknown. In addition, there have been no reports on the effects of continuous hemodiafiltration. In this study, we investigated the effects of continuous hemodiafiltration on tedizolid using two types of dialysis membranes made of different materials.

Methods: The adsorption of tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin to two different dialysis membranes was investigated, and the clearance of each drug was calculated by experiments using an in vitro continuous hemodiafiltration model.

Results: The adsorption of tedizolid, linezolid, and vancomycin on the dialysis membranes was examined, and no adsorption was observed. Experimental results from the continuous hemodiafiltration model showed that linezolid and vancomycin concentrations decreased over time: after two hours, the respective decreases were 26.48 ± 7.14% and 28.51 ± 2.32% for polysulfone membranes, respectively. The decrease was 23.57 ± 4.95% and 28.73 ± 5.13% for the polymethylmethacrylate membranes, respectively. These results suggested that linezolid and vancomycin were eliminated by continuous hemodiafiltration. In contrast, tedizolid phosphate and tedizolid concentrations decreased slightly in the polysulfone and polymethylmethacrylate membranes. The decrease in concentrations were 2.10 ± 0.77% and 2.97 ± 0.60% for the polysulfone membranes, respectively. For the polymethylmethacrylate membranes, the decrease in concentration were 2.01 ± 0.88% and 1.73 ± 0.27%, respectively.

Conclusion: These results suggested that tedizolid should not be considered for dose control during continuous hemodiafiltration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信