肿瘤分级2作为10- 20mm大小的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤淋巴结转移的独立预测因子。

Byung-Soo Park, Sung Hwan Cho, Gyung Mo Son, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Jin Kim, Su Bum Park, Cheol Woong Choi, Hyung Wook Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
{"title":"肿瘤分级2作为10- 20mm大小的直肠神经内分泌肿瘤淋巴结转移的独立预测因子。","authors":"Byung-Soo Park,&nbsp;Sung Hwan Cho,&nbsp;Gyung Mo Son,&nbsp;Hyun Sung Kim,&nbsp;Su Jin Kim,&nbsp;Su Bum Park,&nbsp;Cheol Woong Choi,&nbsp;Hyung Wook Kim,&nbsp;Dong Hoon Shin","doi":"10.14216/kjco.21006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm are endoscopically resected, while those ≥20 mm are treated with radical surgical resection. The choice of treatment for 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs remains controversial. This study aimed to verify factors predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) of 10-20 mm sized rectal NET and utilize them to decide upon the treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients with 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs treated at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital from January 2009 to September 2020 were divided into LNM (+) and LNM (-) groups, and their respective data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients (25%) had LNM while 21 patients (75%) did not. Endorectal ultrasound findings showed tumor size was significantly larger in the LNM (+) than in the LNM (-) group (15 mm vs. 10 mm, P=0.018); however, pathologically, there was no significant difference in tumor size (13 mm vs. 11 mm, P=0.109). The mitotic count (P=0.011), Ki-67 index (P=0.008), and proportion of tumor grade 2 patients (5 cases, 71% vs. 1 case, 5%; P=0.001) were significantly higher in the LNM (+) group. In multivariate analysis, tumor grade 2 was the independent factor predicting LNM (odds ratio, 61.32; 95% confidence interval, 3.17-1,188.64; P=0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tumor grade 2 was the independent factor predicting LNM in 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs. Therefore, it could be considered as the meaningful factor in determining whether radical resection is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":74045,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d9/d9/kjco-17-1-37.PMC9942737.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor grade 2 as the independent predictor for lymph node metastasis in 10-20 mm sized rectal neuroendocrine tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Byung-Soo Park,&nbsp;Sung Hwan Cho,&nbsp;Gyung Mo Son,&nbsp;Hyun Sung Kim,&nbsp;Su Jin Kim,&nbsp;Su Bum Park,&nbsp;Cheol Woong Choi,&nbsp;Hyung Wook Kim,&nbsp;Dong Hoon Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.14216/kjco.21006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm are endoscopically resected, while those ≥20 mm are treated with radical surgical resection. The choice of treatment for 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs remains controversial. This study aimed to verify factors predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) of 10-20 mm sized rectal NET and utilize them to decide upon the treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients with 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs treated at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital from January 2009 to September 2020 were divided into LNM (+) and LNM (-) groups, and their respective data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients (25%) had LNM while 21 patients (75%) did not. Endorectal ultrasound findings showed tumor size was significantly larger in the LNM (+) than in the LNM (-) group (15 mm vs. 10 mm, P=0.018); however, pathologically, there was no significant difference in tumor size (13 mm vs. 11 mm, P=0.109). The mitotic count (P=0.011), Ki-67 index (P=0.008), and proportion of tumor grade 2 patients (5 cases, 71% vs. 1 case, 5%; P=0.001) were significantly higher in the LNM (+) group. In multivariate analysis, tumor grade 2 was the independent factor predicting LNM (odds ratio, 61.32; 95% confidence interval, 3.17-1,188.64; P=0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tumor grade 2 was the independent factor predicting LNM in 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs. Therefore, it could be considered as the meaningful factor in determining whether radical resection is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d9/d9/kjco-17-1-37.PMC9942737.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.21006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.21006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:直肠神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)方法:将2009年1月~ 2020年9月在釜山大学梁山医院治疗的28例10 ~ 20mm直肠神经内分泌肿瘤患者分为LNM(+)组和LNM(-)组,并对各自的数据进行分析。结果:7例(25%)发生LNM, 21例(75%)未发生LNM。直肠内超声检查显示,LNM(+)组肿瘤大小明显大于LNM(-)组(15 mm vs 10 mm, P=0.018);病理上,两组肿瘤大小差异无统计学意义(13 mm vs 11 mm, P=0.109)。有丝分裂计数(P=0.011)、Ki-67指数(P=0.008)、2级肿瘤患者比例(5例,71% vs 1例,5%;P=0.001), LNM(+)组明显增高。在多因素分析中,肿瘤分级2是预测LNM的独立因素(优势比,61.32;95%置信区间为3.17- 1188.64;P = 0.010)。结论:肿瘤分级2是预测10 ~ 20mm直肠网状肿瘤发生LNM的独立因素。因此,它可以被认为是决定是否需要根治性切除的有意义的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Tumor grade 2 as the independent predictor for lymph node metastasis in 10-20 mm sized rectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Tumor grade 2 as the independent predictor for lymph node metastasis in 10-20 mm sized rectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Tumor grade 2 as the independent predictor for lymph node metastasis in 10-20 mm sized rectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Tumor grade 2 as the independent predictor for lymph node metastasis in 10-20 mm sized rectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Purpose: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm are endoscopically resected, while those ≥20 mm are treated with radical surgical resection. The choice of treatment for 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs remains controversial. This study aimed to verify factors predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) of 10-20 mm sized rectal NET and utilize them to decide upon the treatment strategy.

Methods: Twenty-eight patients with 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs treated at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital from January 2009 to September 2020 were divided into LNM (+) and LNM (-) groups, and their respective data were analyzed.

Results: Seven patients (25%) had LNM while 21 patients (75%) did not. Endorectal ultrasound findings showed tumor size was significantly larger in the LNM (+) than in the LNM (-) group (15 mm vs. 10 mm, P=0.018); however, pathologically, there was no significant difference in tumor size (13 mm vs. 11 mm, P=0.109). The mitotic count (P=0.011), Ki-67 index (P=0.008), and proportion of tumor grade 2 patients (5 cases, 71% vs. 1 case, 5%; P=0.001) were significantly higher in the LNM (+) group. In multivariate analysis, tumor grade 2 was the independent factor predicting LNM (odds ratio, 61.32; 95% confidence interval, 3.17-1,188.64; P=0.010).

Conclusion: Tumor grade 2 was the independent factor predicting LNM in 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs. Therefore, it could be considered as the meaningful factor in determining whether radical resection is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信