单眼眼罩调节左半球忽视患者的同侧反应性跳远和平滑追求

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Nadine Schenke , Paul Eling , Thomas Duning , Helmut Hildebrandt
{"title":"单眼眼罩调节左半球忽视患者的同侧反应性跳远和平滑追求","authors":"Nadine Schenke ,&nbsp;Paul Eling ,&nbsp;Thomas Duning ,&nbsp;Helmut Hildebrandt","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2023.106101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients with hemispatial neglect show multiple oculomotor deficits like delayed contralesional saccade latencies, hypometric saccade amplitudes, and impaired smooth pursuit. We aimed to investigate whether modulation of superior colliculus (SC) activity via monocular eye patching improves neglect patients’ eye movements to the contralesional side of space. Thirteen neglect patients with left-hemispheric (LH) stroke, 22 neglect patients with right-hemispheric (RH) stroke, and 24 healthy controls completed a video-oculographic examination of horizontal smooth pursuit and reactive saccades twice, while the left or right eye was covered with an eye patch. Independent of the eye patch position, LH and RH patients showed enlarged saccade latencies toward contralesional stimuli. In addition, both during smooth pursuit and reactive saccades, RH patients made significantly fewer rightward saccades when the right than when the left eye was patched. Moreover, during reactive saccades, RH patients made significantly fewer right than left saccades, but only when the right eye was patched. These findings suggest that the ipsilesional eye patch modulated ipsilesional ocular performance in the RH group, presumably resulting from differences in SC activity. Yet, ipsilesional eye patching did not improve eye movements to the contralesional side of space, possibly due to the incomplete contralateral retinocollicular projection in humans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monocular eye patching modulates ipsilesional reactive saccades and smooth pursuit in patients with left hemispatial neglect\",\"authors\":\"Nadine Schenke ,&nbsp;Paul Eling ,&nbsp;Thomas Duning ,&nbsp;Helmut Hildebrandt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandc.2023.106101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patients with hemispatial neglect show multiple oculomotor deficits like delayed contralesional saccade latencies, hypometric saccade amplitudes, and impaired smooth pursuit. We aimed to investigate whether modulation of superior colliculus (SC) activity via monocular eye patching improves neglect patients’ eye movements to the contralesional side of space. Thirteen neglect patients with left-hemispheric (LH) stroke, 22 neglect patients with right-hemispheric (RH) stroke, and 24 healthy controls completed a video-oculographic examination of horizontal smooth pursuit and reactive saccades twice, while the left or right eye was covered with an eye patch. Independent of the eye patch position, LH and RH patients showed enlarged saccade latencies toward contralesional stimuli. In addition, both during smooth pursuit and reactive saccades, RH patients made significantly fewer rightward saccades when the right than when the left eye was patched. Moreover, during reactive saccades, RH patients made significantly fewer right than left saccades, but only when the right eye was patched. These findings suggest that the ipsilesional eye patch modulated ipsilesional ocular performance in the RH group, presumably resulting from differences in SC activity. Yet, ipsilesional eye patching did not improve eye movements to the contralesional side of space, possibly due to the incomplete contralateral retinocollicular projection in humans.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262623001604\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262623001604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半部分忽视的患者表现出多种眼动缺陷,如延迟的对视性扫视潜伏期,低血压扫视振幅和平滑追求受损。我们的目的是研究通过单眼补眼来调节上丘(SC)的活动是否能改善忽视患者向空间对侧的眼球运动。13例被忽视的左半球(LH)卒中患者、22例被忽视的右半球(RH)卒中患者和24名健康对照者分别在左眼或右眼蒙上眼罩的情况下,完成了两次水平平滑追踪和反应性扫视的视觉检查。与眼罩位置无关,LH和RH患者对对侧刺激的视跳潜伏期增大。此外,在平滑追逐和反应性扫视过程中,RH患者在右眼贴膜时向右扫视明显少于左眼贴膜时。此外,在反应性扫视期间,RH患者的右扫视明显少于左扫视,但仅限于右眼被蒙住时。这些发现表明,在RH组中,同视眼罩调节同视眼表现,可能是由于SC活性的差异。然而,同侧眼罩并没有改善对侧空间的眼球运动,这可能是由于人类对侧视丘投影不完整所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monocular eye patching modulates ipsilesional reactive saccades and smooth pursuit in patients with left hemispatial neglect

Patients with hemispatial neglect show multiple oculomotor deficits like delayed contralesional saccade latencies, hypometric saccade amplitudes, and impaired smooth pursuit. We aimed to investigate whether modulation of superior colliculus (SC) activity via monocular eye patching improves neglect patients’ eye movements to the contralesional side of space. Thirteen neglect patients with left-hemispheric (LH) stroke, 22 neglect patients with right-hemispheric (RH) stroke, and 24 healthy controls completed a video-oculographic examination of horizontal smooth pursuit and reactive saccades twice, while the left or right eye was covered with an eye patch. Independent of the eye patch position, LH and RH patients showed enlarged saccade latencies toward contralesional stimuli. In addition, both during smooth pursuit and reactive saccades, RH patients made significantly fewer rightward saccades when the right than when the left eye was patched. Moreover, during reactive saccades, RH patients made significantly fewer right than left saccades, but only when the right eye was patched. These findings suggest that the ipsilesional eye patch modulated ipsilesional ocular performance in the RH group, presumably resulting from differences in SC activity. Yet, ipsilesional eye patching did not improve eye movements to the contralesional side of space, possibly due to the incomplete contralateral retinocollicular projection in humans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Cognition
Brain and Cognition 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信