降低经皮左心室辅助装置支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗血管和出血风险的策略。

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
George W Vetrovec, Amir Kaki, Jason Wollmuth, Thom G Dahle
{"title":"降低经皮左心室辅助装置支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗血管和出血风险的策略。","authors":"George W Vetrovec,&nbsp;Amir Kaki,&nbsp;Jason Wollmuth,&nbsp;Thom G Dahle","doi":"10.17925/HI.2022.16.2.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In patients at high risk for haemodynamic instability during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), practitioners are increasingly opting for prophylactic mechanical circulatory support, such as the Impella® heart pump (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA). Though Impella-supported high-risk PCI (HRPCI) ensures haemodynamic stability during the PCI procedure, access-related complication rates have varied significantly in published studies. Reported variability in complication rates relates to many factors, including anticoagulation practices, access and closure strategy, post-procedure care and variations in event definitions. This article aims to outline optimal strategies to minimize vascular and bleeding complications during Impella-supported HRPCI based on previously identified clinical, procedural and postprocedural risk factors. Practices to reduce complications include femoral skills training, standardized protocols to optimize access, closure, anticoagulation management and post-procedural care, as well as the application of techniques and technological advances. Protocols integrating these strategies to mitigate access-related bleeding and vascular complications for Impella-supported procedures can markedly limit vascular access risk as a barrier to appropriate large-bore mechanical circulatory support use in HRPCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"16 2","pages":"105-111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872781/pdf/heart-int-16-105.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Reducing Vascular and Bleeding Risk for Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"George W Vetrovec,&nbsp;Amir Kaki,&nbsp;Jason Wollmuth,&nbsp;Thom G Dahle\",\"doi\":\"10.17925/HI.2022.16.2.105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In patients at high risk for haemodynamic instability during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), practitioners are increasingly opting for prophylactic mechanical circulatory support, such as the Impella® heart pump (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA). Though Impella-supported high-risk PCI (HRPCI) ensures haemodynamic stability during the PCI procedure, access-related complication rates have varied significantly in published studies. Reported variability in complication rates relates to many factors, including anticoagulation practices, access and closure strategy, post-procedure care and variations in event definitions. This article aims to outline optimal strategies to minimize vascular and bleeding complications during Impella-supported HRPCI based on previously identified clinical, procedural and postprocedural risk factors. Practices to reduce complications include femoral skills training, standardized protocols to optimize access, closure, anticoagulation management and post-procedural care, as well as the application of techniques and technological advances. Protocols integrating these strategies to mitigate access-related bleeding and vascular complications for Impella-supported procedures can markedly limit vascular access risk as a barrier to appropriate large-bore mechanical circulatory support use in HRPCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart International\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"105-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872781/pdf/heart-int-16-105.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2022.16.2.105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2022.16.2.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间血液动力学不稳定的高风险患者中,医生越来越多地选择预防性机械循环支持,如Impella®心脏泵(Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA)。尽管impella支持的高危PCI (HRPCI)确保了PCI手术过程中的血流动力学稳定性,但在已发表的研究中,与通路相关的并发症发生率存在显著差异。报道的并发症发生率的差异与许多因素有关,包括抗凝措施、通道和关闭策略、术后护理和事件定义的变化。本文旨在根据先前确定的临床、手术和术后风险因素,概述在impella支持的HRPCI中最小化血管和出血并发症的最佳策略。减少并发症的做法包括股骨技能培训、标准化方案以优化通路、缝合、抗凝管理和术后护理,以及技术和技术进步的应用。将这些策略整合在一起,以减轻impella支持手术的通路相关出血和血管并发症,可以显着限制血管通路风险,因为这是HRPCI中适当使用大口径机械循环支持的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Strategies for Reducing Vascular and Bleeding Risk for Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Strategies for Reducing Vascular and Bleeding Risk for Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

In patients at high risk for haemodynamic instability during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), practitioners are increasingly opting for prophylactic mechanical circulatory support, such as the Impella® heart pump (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA). Though Impella-supported high-risk PCI (HRPCI) ensures haemodynamic stability during the PCI procedure, access-related complication rates have varied significantly in published studies. Reported variability in complication rates relates to many factors, including anticoagulation practices, access and closure strategy, post-procedure care and variations in event definitions. This article aims to outline optimal strategies to minimize vascular and bleeding complications during Impella-supported HRPCI based on previously identified clinical, procedural and postprocedural risk factors. Practices to reduce complications include femoral skills training, standardized protocols to optimize access, closure, anticoagulation management and post-procedural care, as well as the application of techniques and technological advances. Protocols integrating these strategies to mitigate access-related bleeding and vascular complications for Impella-supported procedures can markedly limit vascular access risk as a barrier to appropriate large-bore mechanical circulatory support use in HRPCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信