弹性科学:从弹性和项目的结合点出发的理论和方法方向

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Nader Naderpajouh , Juri Matinheikki , Lynn A. Keeys , Daniel P. Aldrich , Igor Linkov
{"title":"弹性科学:从弹性和项目的结合点出发的理论和方法方向","authors":"Nader Naderpajouh ,&nbsp;Juri Matinheikki ,&nbsp;Lynn A. Keeys ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Aldrich ,&nbsp;Igor Linkov","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasing concerns about disruptions and the need for adaptation to drastic changes in social and ecological systems is reflected in the growing interest in resilience science. At the same time, the surge in medium to large scale projects around the world, known as projectification of societies, has resulted in considerable interest in the discipline of project studies. The disciplinary idiosyncrasies of project studies motivate a reflection on theoretical and methodological considerations in resilience science. This reflection rests on the experience of instigating research at the juncture of resilience and projects in this special collection. Specifically, we framed these observations as a set of principles that can inform resilience science, including the need for theoretical parsimony, deliberate attention to system boundaries in conceptualization of resilience, as well as critical considerations in measuring resilience. We posit that in its essence, project studies has to navigate a paradox through: (i) investigating projects as efficient form of organizing for a resilient, sustainable and just future, while (ii) unpacking the governance and accountability limitations of temporary organizing within projects that aim to ensure these long-term goals. The proposed principles are core to the broader research stream that we call <em>“projects of future,”</em> a collective inquiry to unpack these paradoxes and a research stream to engage project scholarship with the contemporary phenomena in Anthropocene.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"41 8","pages":"Article 102544"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786323001096/pdfft?md5=663bb1f91651ee81fcb005145775601a&pid=1-s2.0-S0263786323001096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience science: Theoretical and methodological directions from the juncture of resilience and projects\",\"authors\":\"Nader Naderpajouh ,&nbsp;Juri Matinheikki ,&nbsp;Lynn A. Keeys ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Aldrich ,&nbsp;Igor Linkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Increasing concerns about disruptions and the need for adaptation to drastic changes in social and ecological systems is reflected in the growing interest in resilience science. At the same time, the surge in medium to large scale projects around the world, known as projectification of societies, has resulted in considerable interest in the discipline of project studies. The disciplinary idiosyncrasies of project studies motivate a reflection on theoretical and methodological considerations in resilience science. This reflection rests on the experience of instigating research at the juncture of resilience and projects in this special collection. Specifically, we framed these observations as a set of principles that can inform resilience science, including the need for theoretical parsimony, deliberate attention to system boundaries in conceptualization of resilience, as well as critical considerations in measuring resilience. We posit that in its essence, project studies has to navigate a paradox through: (i) investigating projects as efficient form of organizing for a resilient, sustainable and just future, while (ii) unpacking the governance and accountability limitations of temporary organizing within projects that aim to ensure these long-term goals. The proposed principles are core to the broader research stream that we call <em>“projects of future,”</em> a collective inquiry to unpack these paradoxes and a research stream to engage project scholarship with the contemporary phenomena in Anthropocene.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Project Management\",\"volume\":\"41 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 102544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786323001096/pdfft?md5=663bb1f91651ee81fcb005145775601a&pid=1-s2.0-S0263786323001096-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Project Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786323001096\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786323001096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对破坏和适应社会和生态系统剧烈变化的需求的日益关注反映在对恢复力科学的日益增长的兴趣上。与此同时,世界各地被称为社会项目化的大中型项目激增,导致人们对项目研究学科产生了相当大的兴趣。项目研究的学科特质激发了对弹性科学理论和方法考虑的反思。这种反思取决于在这个特殊的集合中,在弹性和项目的结合处进行研究的经验。具体来说,我们将这些观察结果构建为一组可以为弹性科学提供信息的原则,包括理论简约的必要性,在弹性概念化中对系统边界的刻意关注,以及在测量弹性时的关键考虑因素。我们认为,从本质上讲,项目研究必须通过以下方式来解决一个悖论:(i)将项目作为一种有效的组织形式进行调查,以实现一个有弹性的、可持续的和公正的未来,同时(ii)揭示旨在确保这些长期目标的项目内临时组织的治理和问责限制。提出的原则是更广泛的研究流的核心,我们称之为“未来项目”,这是一种解开这些悖论的集体调查,也是一种将项目奖学金与人类世的当代现象联系起来的研究流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilience science: Theoretical and methodological directions from the juncture of resilience and projects

Increasing concerns about disruptions and the need for adaptation to drastic changes in social and ecological systems is reflected in the growing interest in resilience science. At the same time, the surge in medium to large scale projects around the world, known as projectification of societies, has resulted in considerable interest in the discipline of project studies. The disciplinary idiosyncrasies of project studies motivate a reflection on theoretical and methodological considerations in resilience science. This reflection rests on the experience of instigating research at the juncture of resilience and projects in this special collection. Specifically, we framed these observations as a set of principles that can inform resilience science, including the need for theoretical parsimony, deliberate attention to system boundaries in conceptualization of resilience, as well as critical considerations in measuring resilience. We posit that in its essence, project studies has to navigate a paradox through: (i) investigating projects as efficient form of organizing for a resilient, sustainable and just future, while (ii) unpacking the governance and accountability limitations of temporary organizing within projects that aim to ensure these long-term goals. The proposed principles are core to the broader research stream that we call “projects of future,” a collective inquiry to unpack these paradoxes and a research stream to engage project scholarship with the contemporary phenomena in Anthropocene.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信