从遗产保护到开普敦的遗产正义

Q1 Social Sciences
Rike Sitas , Maurietta Stewart
{"title":"从遗产保护到开普敦的遗产正义","authors":"Rike Sitas ,&nbsp;Maurietta Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is widely recognized that Cape Town remains a segregated city, with an affluent elite minority around the central business district and surrounding suburbs, and where the majority of its around four million residents live in the sprawl that makes up the rest of the city. Much of the focus of municipalities has been on how infrastructure can enable just and sustainable urban transitions, and we argue that heritage, seen as a core socio-cultural, material and metaphysical infrastructure, can play a role in this too. The value of working collectively, collaborating inclusively, and co-producing constructively, is now widely accepted as useful tactics for approaching policy making and implementation in local contexts. This article reflects on our (the authors) collaboration, paying particular attention to the co-production of a policy framing note entitled ‘Heritage sustainability and urban development: Valuing tangible and intangible heritage as drivers of placemaking’. We argue that there is a necessary and urgent shift from heritage protection and conservation to heritage justice located within a ‘southerning’ and intersectional feminist approach to action-oriented scholarship. We reflect on our approach to collaboration as deploying caring and care-full tactics of official activism within the City of Cape Town. Ultimately, we propose that these qualities of coproduction, rooted in a shared politics of heritage-based urban justice and sustainability can strengthen how heritage can be mobilized for action in municipalities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39061,"journal":{"name":"City, Culture and Society","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100551"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From heritage conservation to heritage justice in Cape Town\",\"authors\":\"Rike Sitas ,&nbsp;Maurietta Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is widely recognized that Cape Town remains a segregated city, with an affluent elite minority around the central business district and surrounding suburbs, and where the majority of its around four million residents live in the sprawl that makes up the rest of the city. Much of the focus of municipalities has been on how infrastructure can enable just and sustainable urban transitions, and we argue that heritage, seen as a core socio-cultural, material and metaphysical infrastructure, can play a role in this too. The value of working collectively, collaborating inclusively, and co-producing constructively, is now widely accepted as useful tactics for approaching policy making and implementation in local contexts. This article reflects on our (the authors) collaboration, paying particular attention to the co-production of a policy framing note entitled ‘Heritage sustainability and urban development: Valuing tangible and intangible heritage as drivers of placemaking’. We argue that there is a necessary and urgent shift from heritage protection and conservation to heritage justice located within a ‘southerning’ and intersectional feminist approach to action-oriented scholarship. We reflect on our approach to collaboration as deploying caring and care-full tactics of official activism within the City of Cape Town. Ultimately, we propose that these qualities of coproduction, rooted in a shared politics of heritage-based urban justice and sustainability can strengthen how heritage can be mobilized for action in municipalities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"City, Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"City, Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916623000504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916623000504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,开普敦仍然是一个种族隔离的城市,富裕的少数精英居住在中央商务区和周围的郊区,大约400万居民中的大多数居住在城市的其他地方。市政当局的大部分重点都放在基础设施如何实现公正和可持续的城市转型上,我们认为,作为核心社会文化、物质和形而上学基础设施的遗产也可以在这方面发挥作用。集体工作、包容性合作和建设性共同生产的价值,现在被广泛接受为在当地情况下进行政策制定和实施的有用策略。这篇文章反映了我们(作者)的合作,特别关注了共同制作的一份政策框架说明,题为“遗产可持续性和城市发展:重视物质和非物质遗产作为地方建设的驱动力”。我们认为,有必要和紧迫的转变,从遗产保护和保存到遗产正义,位于“南方”和交叉的女权主义方法中,以行动为导向的学术。我们反思了我们的合作方式,即在开普敦市部署关怀和谨慎的官方行动主义策略。最后,我们建议,这些植根于以遗产为基础的城市正义和可持续性的共同政治的合作生产的品质可以加强如何动员遗产在市政当局采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From heritage conservation to heritage justice in Cape Town

It is widely recognized that Cape Town remains a segregated city, with an affluent elite minority around the central business district and surrounding suburbs, and where the majority of its around four million residents live in the sprawl that makes up the rest of the city. Much of the focus of municipalities has been on how infrastructure can enable just and sustainable urban transitions, and we argue that heritage, seen as a core socio-cultural, material and metaphysical infrastructure, can play a role in this too. The value of working collectively, collaborating inclusively, and co-producing constructively, is now widely accepted as useful tactics for approaching policy making and implementation in local contexts. This article reflects on our (the authors) collaboration, paying particular attention to the co-production of a policy framing note entitled ‘Heritage sustainability and urban development: Valuing tangible and intangible heritage as drivers of placemaking’. We argue that there is a necessary and urgent shift from heritage protection and conservation to heritage justice located within a ‘southerning’ and intersectional feminist approach to action-oriented scholarship. We reflect on our approach to collaboration as deploying caring and care-full tactics of official activism within the City of Cape Town. Ultimately, we propose that these qualities of coproduction, rooted in a shared politics of heritage-based urban justice and sustainability can strengthen how heritage can be mobilized for action in municipalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
City, Culture and Society
City, Culture and Society Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信