Covid-19大流行与科学知识:处理真相的逻辑含义

Q3 Medicine

Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100947

M. Simões Mendes

{"title":"Covid-19大流行与科学知识:处理真相的逻辑含义","authors":"M. Simões Mendes","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Unfortunately, many unreasonable measures and biased positions constituted the pandemic scenario in the last years worldwide.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>It is a critical theoretical essay.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Reinforcement of dilemmas without criteria fostered the impoverishment of the discourses. In the current stage, when many measures, research data, and government documents are reviewed in depth, dealing with truth becomes a big challenge.</p></div><div><h3>Perspectives</h3><p>Considering the possibility that countless lives could have been preserved if the real principles of science and rational debate were not misrepresented, the near future will not be easy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100947"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid-19 pandemic and scientific knowledge: logical implications for dealing with truth\",\"authors\":\"M. Simões Mendes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Unfortunately, many unreasonable measures and biased positions constituted the pandemic scenario in the last years worldwide.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>It is a critical theoretical essay.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Reinforcement of dilemmas without criteria fostered the impoverishment of the discourses. In the current stage, when many measures, research data, and government documents are reviewed in depth, dealing with truth becomes a big challenge.</p></div><div><h3>Perspectives</h3><p>Considering the possibility that countless lives could have been preserved if the real principles of science and rational debate were not misrepresented, the near future will not be easy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552523000786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552523000786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

不幸的是，许多不合理的措施和有偏见的立场构成了过去几年全球大流行的情景。这是一篇批判性的理论论文。没有标准的困境的强化助长了话语的贫乏。在当前阶段，当许多措施、研究数据和政府文件被深入审查时，处理真相成为一个很大的挑战。考虑到如果科学的真正原则和理性辩论没有被歪曲，无数生命本可以得到保护的可能性，不久的将来将不会容易。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Covid-19 pandemic and scientific knowledge: logical implications for dealing with truth

Background

Unfortunately, many unreasonable measures and biased positions constituted the pandemic scenario in the last years worldwide.

Methodology

It is a critical theoretical essay.

Discussion

Reinforcement of dilemmas without criteria fostered the impoverishment of the discourses. In the current stage, when many measures, research data, and government documents are reviewed in depth, dealing with truth becomes a big challenge.

Perspectives

Considering the possibility that countless lives could have been preserved if the real principles of science and rational debate were not misrepresented, the near future will not be easy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

107

审稿时长

42 days

期刊介绍： This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.