Satoshi Ichihara , Juan José Hidalgo Díaz , Brett Peterson , Philippe Liverneaux , Sybille Facca
{"title":"桡骨远端等弹性置换假体-初步报告","authors":"Satoshi Ichihara , Juan José Hidalgo Díaz , Brett Peterson , Philippe Liverneaux , Sybille Facca","doi":"10.1016/j.main.2015.10.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Here, we present a preliminary case series of unicompartmentalisoelastic resurfacing prosthesis of distal radius to treat comminuted articular fractures of osteoporotic elderly patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Our study included 12 patients, mean age 76-year-old, who presented which a comminuted osteoporotic distal radius fracture. Because of the severity of injury and poor bone quality + osteosynthesis was not deemed to be a good option.</p></div><div><h3>Description of technique</h3><p>The surgery was performed through a dorsal approach. The subchondral bone of the entire distal radial articular was excised and a unicompartmental prosthesis was applied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average follow-up was 32 months. Patients reported an average of pain on a VAS score of 2.8/10. The QuickDASH was 37.4/100. The grip strength was in neutral 49.9%, in supination 59.0%, in pronation 56.2% of the contralateral side respectively. The wrist range of motion in flexion and extension were 56.1% and 79.3%, in supination and pronation 87.7% and 91.0%, respectively compared to the contralateral side. Four postoperative complications were noted. Two patients experienced a complex regional pain syndrome type II + these resolved spontaneously. One patient experienced distal radio-ulnar joint stiffness, this improved after an ulna head resection. Finally, one patient required revision surgery after a secondary traumatic fracture. This was revised with another Unicompartmental prosthesis. Radiographically+ the average volar tilt was 9.8° + the average of radial inclination was 11.6°.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The concept of a unicompartmental isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis offers a promising option for the treatment of comminuted, osteoporotic distal radius articular fractures of elderly patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50699,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie De La Main","volume":"34 6","pages":"Pages 348-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.main.2015.10.048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distal radius isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis – a preliminary report\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Ichihara , Juan José Hidalgo Díaz , Brett Peterson , Philippe Liverneaux , Sybille Facca\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.main.2015.10.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Here, we present a preliminary case series of unicompartmentalisoelastic resurfacing prosthesis of distal radius to treat comminuted articular fractures of osteoporotic elderly patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Our study included 12 patients, mean age 76-year-old, who presented which a comminuted osteoporotic distal radius fracture. Because of the severity of injury and poor bone quality + osteosynthesis was not deemed to be a good option.</p></div><div><h3>Description of technique</h3><p>The surgery was performed through a dorsal approach. The subchondral bone of the entire distal radial articular was excised and a unicompartmental prosthesis was applied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average follow-up was 32 months. Patients reported an average of pain on a VAS score of 2.8/10. The QuickDASH was 37.4/100. The grip strength was in neutral 49.9%, in supination 59.0%, in pronation 56.2% of the contralateral side respectively. The wrist range of motion in flexion and extension were 56.1% and 79.3%, in supination and pronation 87.7% and 91.0%, respectively compared to the contralateral side. Four postoperative complications were noted. Two patients experienced a complex regional pain syndrome type II + these resolved spontaneously. One patient experienced distal radio-ulnar joint stiffness, this improved after an ulna head resection. Finally, one patient required revision surgery after a secondary traumatic fracture. This was revised with another Unicompartmental prosthesis. Radiographically+ the average volar tilt was 9.8° + the average of radial inclination was 11.6°.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The concept of a unicompartmental isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis offers a promising option for the treatment of comminuted, osteoporotic distal radius articular fractures of elderly patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgie De La Main\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 348-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.main.2015.10.048\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgie De La Main\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297320315002036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie De La Main","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297320315002036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Distal radius isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis – a preliminary report
Background
Here, we present a preliminary case series of unicompartmentalisoelastic resurfacing prosthesis of distal radius to treat comminuted articular fractures of osteoporotic elderly patients.
Materials and methods
Our study included 12 patients, mean age 76-year-old, who presented which a comminuted osteoporotic distal radius fracture. Because of the severity of injury and poor bone quality + osteosynthesis was not deemed to be a good option.
Description of technique
The surgery was performed through a dorsal approach. The subchondral bone of the entire distal radial articular was excised and a unicompartmental prosthesis was applied.
Results
The average follow-up was 32 months. Patients reported an average of pain on a VAS score of 2.8/10. The QuickDASH was 37.4/100. The grip strength was in neutral 49.9%, in supination 59.0%, in pronation 56.2% of the contralateral side respectively. The wrist range of motion in flexion and extension were 56.1% and 79.3%, in supination and pronation 87.7% and 91.0%, respectively compared to the contralateral side. Four postoperative complications were noted. Two patients experienced a complex regional pain syndrome type II + these resolved spontaneously. One patient experienced distal radio-ulnar joint stiffness, this improved after an ulna head resection. Finally, one patient required revision surgery after a secondary traumatic fracture. This was revised with another Unicompartmental prosthesis. Radiographically+ the average volar tilt was 9.8° + the average of radial inclination was 11.6°.
Conclusion
The concept of a unicompartmental isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis offers a promising option for the treatment of comminuted, osteoporotic distal radius articular fractures of elderly patients.