受托责任的价值:来自新加坡整体销售的证据

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Jianfeng Hu , Kelvin F.K. Low , Wei Zhang
{"title":"受托责任的价值:来自新加坡整体销售的证据","authors":"Jianfeng Hu ,&nbsp;Kelvin F.K. Low ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.irle.2022.106093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This paper examines the impact of fiduciary duties on collective asset sales in the case of owners acting as delegates for other owners, thereby potentially inducing conflicts of interests. Our identification strategy exploits a unique legal shock in Singapore, which established fiduciary duties in those transactions in the real estate market known colloquially as </span><em>en bloc</em> sales. The imposition of fiduciary duties caused the price premium of units sold <em>via en bloc</em> sales to increase over units ineligible for <em>en bloc</em> sale, as well as over units that, although eligible for <em>en bloc</em> sale, are sold individually. In addition, this valuation effect is stronger for projects with especially severe agency problems as proxied by high ownership turnover. This legal reform also affects the general private housing market beyond the <em>en bloc</em><span> premium: findings show that residential owners are increasingly willing to participate and reduce condominium turnover. Finally, we find that the stock price of public real estate developers responded positively to the legal reform, which indicates a possible overall positive welfare effect. Our study highlights the importance of judicial oversight for addressing agency conflicts in non-consensual asset-sale mechanisms.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47202,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Law and Economics","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 106093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of fiduciary duties: Evidence from en bloc sales in Singapore\",\"authors\":\"Jianfeng Hu ,&nbsp;Kelvin F.K. Low ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irle.2022.106093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>This paper examines the impact of fiduciary duties on collective asset sales in the case of owners acting as delegates for other owners, thereby potentially inducing conflicts of interests. Our identification strategy exploits a unique legal shock in Singapore, which established fiduciary duties in those transactions in the real estate market known colloquially as </span><em>en bloc</em> sales. The imposition of fiduciary duties caused the price premium of units sold <em>via en bloc</em> sales to increase over units ineligible for <em>en bloc</em> sale, as well as over units that, although eligible for <em>en bloc</em> sale, are sold individually. In addition, this valuation effect is stronger for projects with especially severe agency problems as proxied by high ownership turnover. This legal reform also affects the general private housing market beyond the <em>en bloc</em><span> premium: findings show that residential owners are increasingly willing to participate and reduce condominium turnover. Finally, we find that the stock price of public real estate developers responded positively to the legal reform, which indicates a possible overall positive welfare effect. Our study highlights the importance of judicial oversight for addressing agency conflicts in non-consensual asset-sale mechanisms.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Law and Economics\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Law and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818822000497\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818822000497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了在所有者作为其他所有者的代表的情况下,信托义务对集体资产销售的影响,从而可能引发利益冲突。我们的识别策略利用了新加坡独特的法律冲击,它在房地产市场的交易中建立了信托义务,俗称整体销售。信托税的征收导致通过整体销售出售的单位的价格溢价高于不符合整体销售条件的单位,以及尽管符合整体销售条件但单独出售的单位。此外,对于以高所有权周转率为代表的代理问题特别严重的项目,这种估值效应更强。这项法律改革还影响了整体溢价之外的一般私人住房市场:调查结果显示,住宅业主越来越愿意参与并减少共管公寓的成交量。最后,我们发现公共房地产开发商的股票价格对法律改革的响应是积极的,这表明可能存在整体的正福利效应。我们的研究强调了司法监督对于解决非自愿资产出售机制中的代理冲突的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of fiduciary duties: Evidence from en bloc sales in Singapore

This paper examines the impact of fiduciary duties on collective asset sales in the case of owners acting as delegates for other owners, thereby potentially inducing conflicts of interests. Our identification strategy exploits a unique legal shock in Singapore, which established fiduciary duties in those transactions in the real estate market known colloquially as en bloc sales. The imposition of fiduciary duties caused the price premium of units sold via en bloc sales to increase over units ineligible for en bloc sale, as well as over units that, although eligible for en bloc sale, are sold individually. In addition, this valuation effect is stronger for projects with especially severe agency problems as proxied by high ownership turnover. This legal reform also affects the general private housing market beyond the en bloc premium: findings show that residential owners are increasingly willing to participate and reduce condominium turnover. Finally, we find that the stock price of public real estate developers responded positively to the legal reform, which indicates a possible overall positive welfare effect. Our study highlights the importance of judicial oversight for addressing agency conflicts in non-consensual asset-sale mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The International Review of Law and Economics provides a forum for interdisciplinary research at the interface of law and economics. IRLE is international in scope and audience and particularly welcomes both theoretical and empirical papers on comparative law and economics, globalization and legal harmonization, and the endogenous emergence of legal institutions, in addition to more traditional legal topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信