经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的术前模拟结果和术中图像融合引导:一项针对十九名患者的可行性研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Pub Date : 2024-03-06 Epub Date: 2023-03-24 DOI:10.4274/dir.2022.221652
Xin Wei, Hong Hu, Lin Qi, Liming Zhong, Yunguo Liao, Jiaqi Pu
{"title":"经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的术前模拟结果和术中图像融合引导:一项针对十九名患者的可行性研究。","authors":"Xin Wei, Hong Hu, Lin Qi, Liming Zhong, Yunguo Liao, Jiaqi Pu","doi":"10.4274/dir.2022.221652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion guidance during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen patients were enrolled in the present study. The three-dimensional (3D) structures of the bone, liver, portal vein, inferior vena cava, and hepatic vein in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning area were reconstructed in the Mimics software. The virtual Rosch-Uchida liver access set and the VIATORR stent model were established in the 3D Max software. The puncture path from the hepatic vein to the portal vein and the release position of the stent were simulated in the Mimics and 3D Max software, respectively. The simulation results were exported to Photoshop software, and the 3D reconstructed top of the liver diaphragm was used as the registration point to fuse with the liver diaphragmatic surface of the intraoperative fluoroscopy image. The selected portal vein system fusion image was overlaid on the reference display screen to provide image guidance during the operation. As a control, the last 19 consecutive cases of portal vein puncture under the guidance of conventional fluoroscopy were analyzed retrospectively, including the number of puncture attempts, puncture time, total procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, and total exposure dose (dose area product).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average time of preoperative simulation was about 61.26 ± 6.98 minutes. The average time of intraoperative image fusion was 6.05 ± 1.13 minutes. The median number of puncture attempts was not significantly different between the study group (n = 3) and the control group (n = 3; <i>P</i> = 0.175). The mean puncture time in the study group (17.74 ± 12.78 min) was significantly lower than that in the control group (58.32 ± 47.11 min; <i>P</i> = 0.002). The mean total fluoroscopy time was not significantly different between the study group (26.63 ± 12.84 min) and the control group (40.00 ± 23.44 min; <i>P</i> = 0.083). The mean total procedure time was significantly lower in the study group (79.74 ± 37.39 min) compared with the control group (121.70 ± 62.24 min; <i>P</i> = 0.019). The dose area product of the study group (220.60 ± 128.4 Gy. cm<sup>2</sup>) was not significantly different from that of the control group (228.5 ± 137.3 Gy. cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.773). There were no image guidance-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion to guide a portal vein puncture is feasible, safe, and effective when creating a TIPS. The method is cheap and may improve portal vein puncture, which may be valuable for hospitals lacking intravascular ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) equipment equipped with a CT-angiography function.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion guidance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement: a feasibility study of nineteen patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Wei, Hong Hu, Lin Qi, Liming Zhong, Yunguo Liao, Jiaqi Pu\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/dir.2022.221652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion guidance during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen patients were enrolled in the present study. The three-dimensional (3D) structures of the bone, liver, portal vein, inferior vena cava, and hepatic vein in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning area were reconstructed in the Mimics software. The virtual Rosch-Uchida liver access set and the VIATORR stent model were established in the 3D Max software. The puncture path from the hepatic vein to the portal vein and the release position of the stent were simulated in the Mimics and 3D Max software, respectively. The simulation results were exported to Photoshop software, and the 3D reconstructed top of the liver diaphragm was used as the registration point to fuse with the liver diaphragmatic surface of the intraoperative fluoroscopy image. The selected portal vein system fusion image was overlaid on the reference display screen to provide image guidance during the operation. As a control, the last 19 consecutive cases of portal vein puncture under the guidance of conventional fluoroscopy were analyzed retrospectively, including the number of puncture attempts, puncture time, total procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, and total exposure dose (dose area product).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average time of preoperative simulation was about 61.26 ± 6.98 minutes. The average time of intraoperative image fusion was 6.05 ± 1.13 minutes. The median number of puncture attempts was not significantly different between the study group (n = 3) and the control group (n = 3; <i>P</i> = 0.175). The mean puncture time in the study group (17.74 ± 12.78 min) was significantly lower than that in the control group (58.32 ± 47.11 min; <i>P</i> = 0.002). The mean total fluoroscopy time was not significantly different between the study group (26.63 ± 12.84 min) and the control group (40.00 ± 23.44 min; <i>P</i> = 0.083). The mean total procedure time was significantly lower in the study group (79.74 ± 37.39 min) compared with the control group (121.70 ± 62.24 min; <i>P</i> = 0.019). The dose area product of the study group (220.60 ± 128.4 Gy. cm<sup>2</sup>) was not significantly different from that of the control group (228.5 ± 137.3 Gy. cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.773). There were no image guidance-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion to guide a portal vein puncture is feasible, safe, and effective when creating a TIPS. The method is cheap and may improve portal vein puncture, which may be valuable for hospitals lacking intravascular ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) equipment equipped with a CT-angiography function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916528/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and interventional radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.221652\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2022.221652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)术前模拟结果和术中图像融合引导的可行性和有效性:本研究共纳入 19 名患者。在 Mimics 软件中重建了对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描区域内的骨骼、肝脏、门静脉、下腔静脉和肝静脉的三维(3D)结构。在 3D Max 软件中建立了虚拟 Rosch-Uchida 肝脏入路装置和 VIATORR 支架模型。在 Mimics 和 3D Max 软件中分别模拟了从肝静脉到门静脉的穿刺路径和支架的释放位置。模拟结果导出到 Photoshop 软件,以三维重建的肝膈顶部为配准点,与术中透视图像的肝膈表面进行融合。选定的门静脉系统融合图像被叠加在参考显示屏幕上,为手术提供图像引导。作为对照,对最近19例连续在传统透视引导下进行门静脉穿刺的病例进行了回顾性分析,包括穿刺次数、穿刺时间、总手术时间、总透视时间和总暴露剂量(剂量面积乘积):术前模拟的平均时间为(61.26 ± 6.98)分钟。术中图像融合的平均时间为(6.05±1.13)分钟。研究组(n = 3)与对照组(n = 3;P = 0.175)的穿刺次数中位数无明显差异。研究组的平均穿刺时间(17.74 ± 12.78 分钟)明显低于对照组(58.32 ± 47.11 分钟;P = 0.002)。研究组的平均透视总时间(26.63 ± 12.84 分钟)与对照组(40.00 ± 23.44 分钟;P = 0.083)无明显差异。研究组的平均手术总时间(79.74 ± 37.39 分钟)明显低于对照组(121.70 ± 62.24 分钟;P = 0.019)。研究组的剂量面积乘积(220.60 ± 128.4 Gy. cm2)与对照组(228.5 ± 137.3 Gy. cm2; P = 0.773)无明显差异。无图像引导相关并发症:结论:使用术前模拟结果和术中图像融合引导门静脉穿刺在创建 TIPS 时是可行、安全和有效的。该方法成本低廉,可改善门静脉穿刺效果,对于缺乏血管内超声和数字减影血管造影(DSA)设备(配备 CT 血管造影功能)的医院来说可能很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion guidance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement: a feasibility study of nineteen patients.

Purpose: The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion guidance during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation.

Methods: Nineteen patients were enrolled in the present study. The three-dimensional (3D) structures of the bone, liver, portal vein, inferior vena cava, and hepatic vein in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning area were reconstructed in the Mimics software. The virtual Rosch-Uchida liver access set and the VIATORR stent model were established in the 3D Max software. The puncture path from the hepatic vein to the portal vein and the release position of the stent were simulated in the Mimics and 3D Max software, respectively. The simulation results were exported to Photoshop software, and the 3D reconstructed top of the liver diaphragm was used as the registration point to fuse with the liver diaphragmatic surface of the intraoperative fluoroscopy image. The selected portal vein system fusion image was overlaid on the reference display screen to provide image guidance during the operation. As a control, the last 19 consecutive cases of portal vein puncture under the guidance of conventional fluoroscopy were analyzed retrospectively, including the number of puncture attempts, puncture time, total procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, and total exposure dose (dose area product).

Results: The average time of preoperative simulation was about 61.26 ± 6.98 minutes. The average time of intraoperative image fusion was 6.05 ± 1.13 minutes. The median number of puncture attempts was not significantly different between the study group (n = 3) and the control group (n = 3; P = 0.175). The mean puncture time in the study group (17.74 ± 12.78 min) was significantly lower than that in the control group (58.32 ± 47.11 min; P = 0.002). The mean total fluoroscopy time was not significantly different between the study group (26.63 ± 12.84 min) and the control group (40.00 ± 23.44 min; P = 0.083). The mean total procedure time was significantly lower in the study group (79.74 ± 37.39 min) compared with the control group (121.70 ± 62.24 min; P = 0.019). The dose area product of the study group (220.60 ± 128.4 Gy. cm2) was not significantly different from that of the control group (228.5 ± 137.3 Gy. cm2; P = 0.773). There were no image guidance-related complications.

Conclusion: The use of preoperative simulation results and intraoperative image fusion to guide a portal vein puncture is feasible, safe, and effective when creating a TIPS. The method is cheap and may improve portal vein puncture, which may be valuable for hospitals lacking intravascular ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) equipment equipped with a CT-angiography function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信