1926年泽西岛震源参数的重新评估

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
D. Baumont , D. Amorèse , J. Benjumea , F. Ego , J.-P. Tardivel , P. Arroucau
{"title":"1926年泽西岛震源参数的重新评估","authors":"D. Baumont ,&nbsp;D. Amorèse ,&nbsp;J. Benjumea ,&nbsp;F. Ego ,&nbsp;J.-P. Tardivel ,&nbsp;P. Arroucau","doi":"10.1016/j.pepi.2023.107113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The Cotentin peninsula is a region located on the northeastern edge of the Armorican Massif (France) that hosts several nuclear and radioactive waste facilities. A recent publication raised some issues regarding the source parameters of the 1926, Jersey earthquake, one of the key reference earthquakes for assessing the </span>seismic hazard at the nuclear sites. In this study, we performed in-depth analyses on both the instrumental and macroseismic data to reappraise the source parameters. While the instrumental epicentral location was fairly well constrained at about mid-distance between the Jersey Island and the Cotentin peninsula, the focal depth could not be retrieved due to the resolution limits associated with a sparse seismological network and to the uncertainties on the phase picking. Different </span><em>M</em><sub>S</sub> formulations applicable for moderate magnitude events recorded at regional distances were implemented to better account for the epistemic uncertainties, resulting in an estimation of M<sub>S</sub> equal to 5.1 ± 0.3. Regarding the moment magnitude M<sub>W</sub><span>, we performed a broad series of waveform modeling accounting for a broad set of source parameterizations and signal processing techniques. The magnitude M</span><sub>W</sub> of the Jersey earthquake is estimated to 5.4 ± 0.3 although these evaluations are strongly influenced by the period range adopted to fit the observations. We also carried out the evaluation of both M<sub>S</sub> and M<sub>W</sub> magnitudes by modeling the macroseismic field with results (M<sub>S</sub> = 5.1 ± 0.3; Mw = 5.3 ± 0.3) that are consistent with the instrumental estimates. Regarding the focal depth, the macroseismic analyses shed light on this parameter, even though the results depend on the assumption made on the presumed epicentral intensity (∼18 km for I<sub>0</sub> = VI-VII and ∼ 12 km for I<sub>0</sub> = VII).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54614,"journal":{"name":"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 107113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reappraisal of the 1926, Jersey earthquake source parameters\",\"authors\":\"D. Baumont ,&nbsp;D. Amorèse ,&nbsp;J. Benjumea ,&nbsp;F. Ego ,&nbsp;J.-P. Tardivel ,&nbsp;P. Arroucau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pepi.2023.107113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The Cotentin peninsula is a region located on the northeastern edge of the Armorican Massif (France) that hosts several nuclear and radioactive waste facilities. A recent publication raised some issues regarding the source parameters of the 1926, Jersey earthquake, one of the key reference earthquakes for assessing the </span>seismic hazard at the nuclear sites. In this study, we performed in-depth analyses on both the instrumental and macroseismic data to reappraise the source parameters. While the instrumental epicentral location was fairly well constrained at about mid-distance between the Jersey Island and the Cotentin peninsula, the focal depth could not be retrieved due to the resolution limits associated with a sparse seismological network and to the uncertainties on the phase picking. Different </span><em>M</em><sub>S</sub> formulations applicable for moderate magnitude events recorded at regional distances were implemented to better account for the epistemic uncertainties, resulting in an estimation of M<sub>S</sub> equal to 5.1 ± 0.3. Regarding the moment magnitude M<sub>W</sub><span>, we performed a broad series of waveform modeling accounting for a broad set of source parameterizations and signal processing techniques. The magnitude M</span><sub>W</sub> of the Jersey earthquake is estimated to 5.4 ± 0.3 although these evaluations are strongly influenced by the period range adopted to fit the observations. We also carried out the evaluation of both M<sub>S</sub> and M<sub>W</sub> magnitudes by modeling the macroseismic field with results (M<sub>S</sub> = 5.1 ± 0.3; Mw = 5.3 ± 0.3) that are consistent with the instrumental estimates. Regarding the focal depth, the macroseismic analyses shed light on this parameter, even though the results depend on the assumption made on the presumed epicentral intensity (∼18 km for I<sub>0</sub> = VI-VII and ∼ 12 km for I<sub>0</sub> = VII).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors\",\"volume\":\"345 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031920123001395\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031920123001395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科坦坦半岛是位于法国阿莫里亚山脉东北边缘的一个地区,拥有几个核和放射性废物设施。最近的一份出版物提出了关于1926年泽西岛地震的震源参数的一些问题,这是评估核设施地震危险性的关键参考地震之一。在这项研究中,我们对仪器和宏观地震数据进行了深入分析,以重新评估震源参数。虽然仪器的震中位置被很好地限制在泽西岛和科坦丁半岛之间的中距离,但由于稀疏地震台网的分辨率限制和相位拾取的不确定性,无法检索到震源深度。不同的质谱公式适用于在区域距离记录的中等震级事件,以更好地解释认知不确定性,导致质谱估计等于5.1±0.3。关于矩量级MW,我们进行了一系列广泛的波形建模,考虑了广泛的源参数化和信号处理技术。泽西岛地震的震级估计为5.4±0.3,尽管这些评估受到拟合观测所采用的周期范围的强烈影响。我们还通过模拟大地震场对MS和MW震级进行了评估,结果显示(MS = 5.1±0.3;Mw = 5.3±0.3),与仪器估计一致。关于震源深度,宏观地震分析揭示了这一参数,尽管结果依赖于假定的震中强度(I0 = VI-VII时为~ 18 km, I0 = VII时为~ 12 km)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reappraisal of the 1926, Jersey earthquake source parameters

Reappraisal of the 1926, Jersey earthquake source parameters

The Cotentin peninsula is a region located on the northeastern edge of the Armorican Massif (France) that hosts several nuclear and radioactive waste facilities. A recent publication raised some issues regarding the source parameters of the 1926, Jersey earthquake, one of the key reference earthquakes for assessing the seismic hazard at the nuclear sites. In this study, we performed in-depth analyses on both the instrumental and macroseismic data to reappraise the source parameters. While the instrumental epicentral location was fairly well constrained at about mid-distance between the Jersey Island and the Cotentin peninsula, the focal depth could not be retrieved due to the resolution limits associated with a sparse seismological network and to the uncertainties on the phase picking. Different MS formulations applicable for moderate magnitude events recorded at regional distances were implemented to better account for the epistemic uncertainties, resulting in an estimation of MS equal to 5.1 ± 0.3. Regarding the moment magnitude MW, we performed a broad series of waveform modeling accounting for a broad set of source parameterizations and signal processing techniques. The magnitude MW of the Jersey earthquake is estimated to 5.4 ± 0.3 although these evaluations are strongly influenced by the period range adopted to fit the observations. We also carried out the evaluation of both MS and MW magnitudes by modeling the macroseismic field with results (MS = 5.1 ± 0.3; Mw = 5.3 ± 0.3) that are consistent with the instrumental estimates. Regarding the focal depth, the macroseismic analyses shed light on this parameter, even though the results depend on the assumption made on the presumed epicentral intensity (∼18 km for I0 = VI-VII and ∼ 12 km for I0 = VII).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 地学天文-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
18.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Launched in 1968 to fill the need for an international journal in the field of planetary physics, geodesy and geophysics, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors has now grown to become important reading matter for all geophysicists. It is the only journal to be entirely devoted to the physical and chemical processes of planetary interiors. Original research papers, review articles, short communications and book reviews are all published on a regular basis; and from time to time special issues of the journal are devoted to the publication of the proceedings of symposia and congresses which the editors feel will be of particular interest to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信