实验验证了磁悬浮系统的频移内模串级控制策略

IF 1.8 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Arunima Sagar , Rahul Radhakrishnan , G. Lloyds Raja
{"title":"实验验证了磁悬浮系统的频移内模串级控制策略","authors":"Arunima Sagar ,&nbsp;Rahul Radhakrishnan ,&nbsp;G. Lloyds Raja","doi":"10.1016/j.ifacsc.2023.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Magnetic levitation<span><span> systems (MLS) provide friction-less, dependable, quick, and affordable operations in a variety of real life applications. One of the often-employed control strategies for the MLS is traditional cascade control, which uses </span>internal model control (IMC)-based proportional–integral–derivative (PID) and proportional–integral (PI) controllers in its primary and secondary loops, respectively. Though this control structure succeeds in achieving levitation, it falls short in terms of set point tracking and disturbance rejection performance. To overcome this limitation, a bi-loop frequency shifted IMC proportional–derivative (FSIMC-PD) strategy is used in the primary loop retaining the conventional IMC-based PI controller in the secondary loop. Routh stability constraints are used to build the PD controller for stabilizing the MLS. Once the MLS is stabilized, an FSIMC-based </span></span>PID controller<span> for reference tracking is designed for the outer loop. In addition to simulation-based performance comparison of IMC-based PID-PI cascade scheme and the proposed scheme, experimental validation is also carried out on a laboratory scaled MLS setup. Furthermore, performance evaluation based on metrics like the integral of absolute error, integral of square error, integral of time weighted absolute error, total variation of the control signal and its maximum value are also carried out to vindicate the effectiveness of the suggested design. Robust stability analysis is carried out in addition to Nyquist stability considerations to vindicate that the FSIMC-based design is capable of yielding stable closed-loop response amid uncertainties in plant model parameters.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":29926,"journal":{"name":"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimentally validated frequency shifted internal model cascade control strategy for magnetic levitation system\",\"authors\":\"Arunima Sagar ,&nbsp;Rahul Radhakrishnan ,&nbsp;G. Lloyds Raja\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ifacsc.2023.100234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Magnetic levitation<span><span> systems (MLS) provide friction-less, dependable, quick, and affordable operations in a variety of real life applications. One of the often-employed control strategies for the MLS is traditional cascade control, which uses </span>internal model control (IMC)-based proportional–integral–derivative (PID) and proportional–integral (PI) controllers in its primary and secondary loops, respectively. Though this control structure succeeds in achieving levitation, it falls short in terms of set point tracking and disturbance rejection performance. To overcome this limitation, a bi-loop frequency shifted IMC proportional–derivative (FSIMC-PD) strategy is used in the primary loop retaining the conventional IMC-based PI controller in the secondary loop. Routh stability constraints are used to build the PD controller for stabilizing the MLS. Once the MLS is stabilized, an FSIMC-based </span></span>PID controller<span> for reference tracking is designed for the outer loop. In addition to simulation-based performance comparison of IMC-based PID-PI cascade scheme and the proposed scheme, experimental validation is also carried out on a laboratory scaled MLS setup. Furthermore, performance evaluation based on metrics like the integral of absolute error, integral of square error, integral of time weighted absolute error, total variation of the control signal and its maximum value are also carried out to vindicate the effectiveness of the suggested design. Robust stability analysis is carried out in addition to Nyquist stability considerations to vindicate that the FSIMC-based design is capable of yielding stable closed-loop response amid uncertainties in plant model parameters.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468601823000202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFAC Journal of Systems and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468601823000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磁悬浮系统(MLS)在各种实际应用中提供无摩擦、可靠、快速和经济的操作。MLS常用的控制策略之一是传统的串级控制,它在主回路和次回路中分别使用基于内模控制(IMC)的比例积分导数(PID)和比例积分(PI)控制器。虽然这种控制结构成功地实现了悬浮,但在设定点跟踪和抗扰性能方面存在不足。为了克服这一限制,在主回路中使用了双环移频IMC比例导数(FSIMC-PD)策略,在次回路中保留了传统的基于IMC的PI控制器。利用生长稳定性约束构造PD控制器,实现最大最小二乘系统的稳定。在MLS稳定后,外环采用基于fsimc的PID控制器进行参考跟踪。除了将基于imc的PID-PI级联方案与本文提出的方案进行仿真性能比较外,还在实验室规模的MLS装置上进行了实验验证。此外,基于绝对误差积分、平方误差积分、时间加权绝对误差积分、控制信号总变差及其最大值等指标进行了性能评价,以验证所提设计的有效性。除了Nyquist稳定性考虑外,还进行了鲁棒稳定性分析,以证明基于fsimc的设计能够在植物模型参数不确定的情况下产生稳定的闭环响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimentally validated frequency shifted internal model cascade control strategy for magnetic levitation system

Magnetic levitation systems (MLS) provide friction-less, dependable, quick, and affordable operations in a variety of real life applications. One of the often-employed control strategies for the MLS is traditional cascade control, which uses internal model control (IMC)-based proportional–integral–derivative (PID) and proportional–integral (PI) controllers in its primary and secondary loops, respectively. Though this control structure succeeds in achieving levitation, it falls short in terms of set point tracking and disturbance rejection performance. To overcome this limitation, a bi-loop frequency shifted IMC proportional–derivative (FSIMC-PD) strategy is used in the primary loop retaining the conventional IMC-based PI controller in the secondary loop. Routh stability constraints are used to build the PD controller for stabilizing the MLS. Once the MLS is stabilized, an FSIMC-based PID controller for reference tracking is designed for the outer loop. In addition to simulation-based performance comparison of IMC-based PID-PI cascade scheme and the proposed scheme, experimental validation is also carried out on a laboratory scaled MLS setup. Furthermore, performance evaluation based on metrics like the integral of absolute error, integral of square error, integral of time weighted absolute error, total variation of the control signal and its maximum value are also carried out to vindicate the effectiveness of the suggested design. Robust stability analysis is carried out in addition to Nyquist stability considerations to vindicate that the FSIMC-based design is capable of yielding stable closed-loop response amid uncertainties in plant model parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control
IFAC Journal of Systems and Control AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信