Shuo DU (杜朔), Ji-ping ZHAO (赵吉平), Shi-hao DU (杜世豪), Wei GUO (郭玮), Xiao-long XIE (解小龙), Guan-qun WANG (王冠群), Guan-xiong HAN (韩冠雄), Chao YANG (杨超)
{"title":"艾灸治疗女性尿失禁的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Shuo DU (杜朔), Ji-ping ZHAO (赵吉平), Shi-hao DU (杜世豪), Wei GUO (郭玮), Xiao-long XIE (解小龙), Guan-qun WANG (王冠群), Guan-xiong HAN (韩冠雄), Chao YANG (杨超)","doi":"10.1016/j.wjam.2023.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span><span><span>Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition that bothers women's lives, including </span>stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and </span>mixed urinary incontinence<span> (MUI). The current non-surgical treatment of Western medicine includes pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), medication, </span></span>electric stimulation<span><span>, etc., all of which have varied limitations. For instance, the patients are poor in compliance with PFMT and medication results in frequent adverse effects. Being one of the featured treatments of TCM, </span>moxibustion has several merits including safety, low cost and simple operation. In recent years, the clinical evidences prove increasingly that moxibustion may be effective for women with UI. However, there is no high-quality </span></span>systematic review of moxibustion for this disease.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effect and safety of moxibustion on UI (including SUI, UUI and MUI) among women.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From the inception to October 13, 2022, the data of the randomized controlled trials<span> (RCTs) of moxibustion on UI among women were collected from CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, Web of Science, Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Two investigators screened the articles independently and extracted the data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria developed in advance. Using the risk of bias assessment tool of Cochrane Handbook, the included RCTs were evaluated. With RevMan 5.3 software, meta-analysis was performed, and the GRADE tool was adopted to assess evidence certainty of different outcomes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1176 articles were retrieved and 19 of them with 1397 patients were eligible and included in the review. In experimental groups, moxibustion combined with PFMT was used, while in control groups PFMT was applied alone. And the subjects were all women with SUI. Meta-analysis showed that compared with PFMT alone, moxibustion combined with PFMT reduced the urine leakage volume (1-hour pad test) (<em>MD</em> = -1.95g, 95%<em>CI</em> [-2.32, -1.57], <em>P</em> < 0.001), the frequency of UI in 24-hour (<em>MD</em> = -0.64, 95%<em>CI</em> [-0.88, -0.40], <em>P</em><span> < 0.001) and the score of the short form of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF) of women with SUI (</span><em>MD</em> = -2.53, 95%<em>CI</em> [-3.43, -1.63], <em>P</em> < 0.001); and this combined intervention measure did not increase significantly the adverse events (<em>RR</em> = 0.82, 95%<em>CI</em> [0.15, 4.6], <em>P</em> = 0.82). GRADE assessment showed that the UI frequency in 24-hour and the incidence of adverse events were rated as low quality, the urine leakage volume of 1-hour pad test and ICIQ-SF score were very low quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Compared with PFMT alone, the intervention combined with moxibustion greatly reduced the urine leakage volume and UI frequency and improved the quality of life (QoL) among women with SUI with favorable safety. Moxibustion could be effective supplementary therapy on SUI among women. However, due to the high risk of bias of the included trials and low certainty of evidence, more high-quality clinical studies are needed to verify the above findings.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>Registered on PROSPERO: CRD42022297643.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44648,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 314-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review and meta-analysis of moxibustion on urinary incontinence among women\",\"authors\":\"Shuo DU (杜朔), Ji-ping ZHAO (赵吉平), Shi-hao DU (杜世豪), Wei GUO (郭玮), Xiao-long XIE (解小龙), Guan-qun WANG (王冠群), Guan-xiong HAN (韩冠雄), Chao YANG (杨超)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wjam.2023.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span><span><span>Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition that bothers women's lives, including </span>stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and </span>mixed urinary incontinence<span> (MUI). The current non-surgical treatment of Western medicine includes pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), medication, </span></span>electric stimulation<span><span>, etc., all of which have varied limitations. For instance, the patients are poor in compliance with PFMT and medication results in frequent adverse effects. Being one of the featured treatments of TCM, </span>moxibustion has several merits including safety, low cost and simple operation. In recent years, the clinical evidences prove increasingly that moxibustion may be effective for women with UI. However, there is no high-quality </span></span>systematic review of moxibustion for this disease.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effect and safety of moxibustion on UI (including SUI, UUI and MUI) among women.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From the inception to October 13, 2022, the data of the randomized controlled trials<span> (RCTs) of moxibustion on UI among women were collected from CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, Web of Science, Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Two investigators screened the articles independently and extracted the data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria developed in advance. Using the risk of bias assessment tool of Cochrane Handbook, the included RCTs were evaluated. With RevMan 5.3 software, meta-analysis was performed, and the GRADE tool was adopted to assess evidence certainty of different outcomes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1176 articles were retrieved and 19 of them with 1397 patients were eligible and included in the review. In experimental groups, moxibustion combined with PFMT was used, while in control groups PFMT was applied alone. And the subjects were all women with SUI. Meta-analysis showed that compared with PFMT alone, moxibustion combined with PFMT reduced the urine leakage volume (1-hour pad test) (<em>MD</em> = -1.95g, 95%<em>CI</em> [-2.32, -1.57], <em>P</em> < 0.001), the frequency of UI in 24-hour (<em>MD</em> = -0.64, 95%<em>CI</em> [-0.88, -0.40], <em>P</em><span> < 0.001) and the score of the short form of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF) of women with SUI (</span><em>MD</em> = -2.53, 95%<em>CI</em> [-3.43, -1.63], <em>P</em> < 0.001); and this combined intervention measure did not increase significantly the adverse events (<em>RR</em> = 0.82, 95%<em>CI</em> [0.15, 4.6], <em>P</em> = 0.82). GRADE assessment showed that the UI frequency in 24-hour and the incidence of adverse events were rated as low quality, the urine leakage volume of 1-hour pad test and ICIQ-SF score were very low quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Compared with PFMT alone, the intervention combined with moxibustion greatly reduced the urine leakage volume and UI frequency and improved the quality of life (QoL) among women with SUI with favorable safety. Moxibustion could be effective supplementary therapy on SUI among women. However, due to the high risk of bias of the included trials and low certainty of evidence, more high-quality clinical studies are needed to verify the above findings.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>Registered on PROSPERO: CRD42022297643.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 314-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525723000624\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525723000624","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尿失禁(UI)是困扰女性生活的常见疾病,包括压力性尿失禁(SUI)、紧迫性尿失禁(UUI)和混合性尿失禁(MUI)。目前西医非手术治疗包括盆底肌训练(PFMT)、药物治疗、电刺激等,均有不同程度的局限性。例如,患者对PFMT的依从性较差,药物治疗经常导致不良反应。艾灸是中医特色疗法之一,具有安全、成本低、操作简单等优点。近年来,越来越多的临床证据证明艾灸对女性尿失禁可能有效。然而,尚无关于艾灸治疗本病的高质量系统综述。目的评价艾灸治疗女性尿失禁(包括SUI、UUI和MUI)的疗效和安全性。方法收集中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据(WanFang data)、维普(VIP)、中国医学信息网(SinoMed)、Web of Science、Pubmed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library等数据库自成立之日起至2022年10月13日止艾灸治疗女性尿路感染的随机对照试验(RCTs)数据。两名研究者根据事先制定的纳入和排除标准独立筛选文章并提取数据。采用Cochrane手册的偏倚风险评估工具对纳入的rct进行评估。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行meta分析,采用GRADE工具评估不同结局的证据确定性。结果共检索到1176篇文献,其中符合条件的文献19篇,1397例患者被纳入本综述。实验组采用艾灸联合PFMT治疗,对照组单独应用PFMT治疗。研究对象均为SUI女性。meta分析显示,与单独使用PFMT相比,艾灸联合PFMT减少了尿漏量(1小时尿垫试验)(MD = -1.95g, 95%CI [-2.32, -1.57], P <0.001), 24小时内尿失禁频率(MD = -0.64, 95%CI [-0.88, -0.40], P <0.001)和SUI女性尿失禁国际咨询问卷(ICIQ-SF)简短形式评分(MD = -2.53, 95%CI [-3.43, -1.63], P <0.001);该联合干预措施未显著增加不良事件(RR = 0.82, 95%CI [0.15, 4.6], P = 0.82)。GRADE评价显示24小时尿失禁频次及不良事件发生率为低质量,1小时尿垫试验漏尿量及ICIQ-SF评分为极低质量。结论与单纯PFMT治疗相比,联合艾灸治疗可显著降低SUI患者的漏尿量和尿失禁频率,提高患者的生活质量,且安全性较好。艾灸是治疗女性SUI的有效补充疗法。然而,由于纳入的试验偏倚风险较高,证据的确定性较低,需要更多高质量的临床研究来验证上述发现。在普洛斯彼罗上注册:CRD42022297643。
Systematic review and meta-analysis of moxibustion on urinary incontinence among women
Background
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition that bothers women's lives, including stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). The current non-surgical treatment of Western medicine includes pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), medication, electric stimulation, etc., all of which have varied limitations. For instance, the patients are poor in compliance with PFMT and medication results in frequent adverse effects. Being one of the featured treatments of TCM, moxibustion has several merits including safety, low cost and simple operation. In recent years, the clinical evidences prove increasingly that moxibustion may be effective for women with UI. However, there is no high-quality systematic review of moxibustion for this disease.
Objective
To evaluate the effect and safety of moxibustion on UI (including SUI, UUI and MUI) among women.
Methods
From the inception to October 13, 2022, the data of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of moxibustion on UI among women were collected from CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed, Web of Science, Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Two investigators screened the articles independently and extracted the data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria developed in advance. Using the risk of bias assessment tool of Cochrane Handbook, the included RCTs were evaluated. With RevMan 5.3 software, meta-analysis was performed, and the GRADE tool was adopted to assess evidence certainty of different outcomes.
Results
A total of 1176 articles were retrieved and 19 of them with 1397 patients were eligible and included in the review. In experimental groups, moxibustion combined with PFMT was used, while in control groups PFMT was applied alone. And the subjects were all women with SUI. Meta-analysis showed that compared with PFMT alone, moxibustion combined with PFMT reduced the urine leakage volume (1-hour pad test) (MD = -1.95g, 95%CI [-2.32, -1.57], P < 0.001), the frequency of UI in 24-hour (MD = -0.64, 95%CI [-0.88, -0.40], P < 0.001) and the score of the short form of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF) of women with SUI (MD = -2.53, 95%CI [-3.43, -1.63], P < 0.001); and this combined intervention measure did not increase significantly the adverse events (RR = 0.82, 95%CI [0.15, 4.6], P = 0.82). GRADE assessment showed that the UI frequency in 24-hour and the incidence of adverse events were rated as low quality, the urine leakage volume of 1-hour pad test and ICIQ-SF score were very low quality.
Conclusion
Compared with PFMT alone, the intervention combined with moxibustion greatly reduced the urine leakage volume and UI frequency and improved the quality of life (QoL) among women with SUI with favorable safety. Moxibustion could be effective supplementary therapy on SUI among women. However, due to the high risk of bias of the included trials and low certainty of evidence, more high-quality clinical studies are needed to verify the above findings.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the journal includes, but is not confined to, clinical research, summaries of clinical experiences, experimental research and clinical reports on needling techniques, moxibustion techniques, acupuncture analgesia and acupuncture anesthesia.