为退伍军人膝关节骨关节炎管理提供决策辅助的可接受性和可行性-一项试点研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Clifford A Reilly, Makenna L Rice, Dylan J Parker, Philip P Goodney, Jon D Lurie, Said A Ibrahim, Eric R Henderson
{"title":"为退伍军人膝关节骨关节炎管理提供决策辅助的可接受性和可行性-一项试点研究。","authors":"Clifford A Reilly,&nbsp;Makenna L Rice,&nbsp;Dylan J Parker,&nbsp;Philip P Goodney,&nbsp;Jon D Lurie,&nbsp;Said A Ibrahim,&nbsp;Eric R Henderson","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S386937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Decision aids are effective tools in facilitating patient-centered care and patient involvement in the decision-making process. Given unique barriers to providing patient-centered care for Veterans, implementation of decision aids may improve overall quality of care. We aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of video-based and pamphlet-based decision aid use in Veterans with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Veterans considering treatment for knee osteoarthritis received either an online video-based aid, pamphlet-based aid, or both before their surgical consult. At their visit, patients completed written pre-visit and post-visit questionnaires. The pre-visit questionnaire included questions about the patient's demographics, decision-making preferences, experiences using the assigned decision aids, and the Hip-Knee Decision Quality Instrument. The post-visit questionnaire assessed the patient's overall experience with the decision-making process and how use of the decision aid influenced their discussion with the physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 16 patients who received the pamphlet-based aid reviewed the decision aid before their visit, compared to only five of the 12 patients who received the video-based aid. Thirteen of 20 patients indicated that they preferred to share treatment decision-making with their physician. Seventeen of 20 patients believed they would feel comfortable questioning the treatment recommendation of their surgeon after decision aid use. Most patients reported a positive experience using their decision aid, regardless of modality, and found it easily comprehensible and useful in visit preparation. A preference for a pamphlet-based aid was expressed by the majority of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Veterans considering treatment for knee osteoarthritis are well prepared to engage in a patient-centered care experience. Most patients preferred sharing the decision-making process with their physician and felt comfortable questioning them about treatment recommendations. Decision aids helped Veterans feel more informed about their treatment options and improved engagement and discussion with their physician. Pamphlet-based aids were utilized more reliably than video-based aids.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":"14 ","pages":"49-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/32/prom-14-49.PMC10040150.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability and Feasibility of Delivering Decision Aids to Veterans for Management of Knee Osteoarthritis - A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Clifford A Reilly,&nbsp;Makenna L Rice,&nbsp;Dylan J Parker,&nbsp;Philip P Goodney,&nbsp;Jon D Lurie,&nbsp;Said A Ibrahim,&nbsp;Eric R Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PROM.S386937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Decision aids are effective tools in facilitating patient-centered care and patient involvement in the decision-making process. Given unique barriers to providing patient-centered care for Veterans, implementation of decision aids may improve overall quality of care. We aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of video-based and pamphlet-based decision aid use in Veterans with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Veterans considering treatment for knee osteoarthritis received either an online video-based aid, pamphlet-based aid, or both before their surgical consult. At their visit, patients completed written pre-visit and post-visit questionnaires. The pre-visit questionnaire included questions about the patient's demographics, decision-making preferences, experiences using the assigned decision aids, and the Hip-Knee Decision Quality Instrument. The post-visit questionnaire assessed the patient's overall experience with the decision-making process and how use of the decision aid influenced their discussion with the physician.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 16 patients who received the pamphlet-based aid reviewed the decision aid before their visit, compared to only five of the 12 patients who received the video-based aid. Thirteen of 20 patients indicated that they preferred to share treatment decision-making with their physician. Seventeen of 20 patients believed they would feel comfortable questioning the treatment recommendation of their surgeon after decision aid use. Most patients reported a positive experience using their decision aid, regardless of modality, and found it easily comprehensible and useful in visit preparation. A preference for a pamphlet-based aid was expressed by the majority of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Veterans considering treatment for knee osteoarthritis are well prepared to engage in a patient-centered care experience. Most patients preferred sharing the decision-making process with their physician and felt comfortable questioning them about treatment recommendations. Decision aids helped Veterans feel more informed about their treatment options and improved engagement and discussion with their physician. Pamphlet-based aids were utilized more reliably than video-based aids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"49-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/32/prom-14-49.PMC10040150.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Related Outcome Measures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S386937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S386937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:辅助决策是促进以患者为中心的护理和患者参与决策过程的有效工具。考虑到为退伍军人提供以病人为中心的护理的独特障碍,决策辅助的实施可能会提高护理的整体质量。我们的目的是评估基于视频和基于小册子的决策辅助在患有膝关节骨关节炎的退伍军人中的可接受性和可行性。材料和方法:考虑治疗膝骨关节炎的退伍军人在手术会诊前,要么接受基于在线视频的辅助,要么接受基于小册子的辅助,要么两者兼而有之。在他们的访问中,患者完成了书面的访问前和访问后问卷。访前问卷包括患者的人口统计学、决策偏好、使用指定决策辅助工具的经验和髋关节-膝关节决策质量工具等问题。访问后问卷评估患者的总体经验与决策过程,以及如何使用决策辅助影响他们与医生的讨论。结果:所有16名接受基于小册子的辅助治疗的患者在就诊前都回顾了决策辅助,而12名接受基于视频的辅助治疗的患者中只有5名患者在就诊前回顾了决策辅助。20名患者中有13名表示,他们更愿意与医生分享治疗决策。20名患者中有17名认为,在使用决策辅助工具后,他们可以放心地质疑外科医生的治疗建议。大多数患者报告了积极的经验,使用他们的决策援助,无论形式,并发现它很容易理解和有用的访问准备。大多数患者倾向于使用以小册子为基础的辅助工具。结论:考虑治疗膝骨关节炎的退伍军人做好了充分的准备,可以参与以患者为中心的护理体验。大多数患者更愿意与他们的医生分享决策过程,并对向他们询问治疗建议感到自在。决策辅助帮助退伍军人更了解他们的治疗选择,并改善了与医生的接触和讨论。以小册子为基础的辅助工具比以视频为基础的辅助工具更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Acceptability and Feasibility of Delivering Decision Aids to Veterans for Management of Knee Osteoarthritis - A Pilot Study.

Acceptability and Feasibility of Delivering Decision Aids to Veterans for Management of Knee Osteoarthritis - A Pilot Study.

Introduction: Decision aids are effective tools in facilitating patient-centered care and patient involvement in the decision-making process. Given unique barriers to providing patient-centered care for Veterans, implementation of decision aids may improve overall quality of care. We aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of video-based and pamphlet-based decision aid use in Veterans with knee osteoarthritis.

Materials and methods: Veterans considering treatment for knee osteoarthritis received either an online video-based aid, pamphlet-based aid, or both before their surgical consult. At their visit, patients completed written pre-visit and post-visit questionnaires. The pre-visit questionnaire included questions about the patient's demographics, decision-making preferences, experiences using the assigned decision aids, and the Hip-Knee Decision Quality Instrument. The post-visit questionnaire assessed the patient's overall experience with the decision-making process and how use of the decision aid influenced their discussion with the physician.

Results: All 16 patients who received the pamphlet-based aid reviewed the decision aid before their visit, compared to only five of the 12 patients who received the video-based aid. Thirteen of 20 patients indicated that they preferred to share treatment decision-making with their physician. Seventeen of 20 patients believed they would feel comfortable questioning the treatment recommendation of their surgeon after decision aid use. Most patients reported a positive experience using their decision aid, regardless of modality, and found it easily comprehensible and useful in visit preparation. A preference for a pamphlet-based aid was expressed by the majority of patients.

Conclusion: Veterans considering treatment for knee osteoarthritis are well prepared to engage in a patient-centered care experience. Most patients preferred sharing the decision-making process with their physician and felt comfortable questioning them about treatment recommendations. Decision aids helped Veterans feel more informed about their treatment options and improved engagement and discussion with their physician. Pamphlet-based aids were utilized more reliably than video-based aids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信