Mariely Navarrete , Iván Godoy , Patricia Melo , Javiera Nally
{"title":"Correlación entre biotipo gingival, ancho y grosor de encía adherida en zona estética del maxilar superior","authors":"Mariely Navarrete ,&nbsp;Iván Godoy ,&nbsp;Patricia Melo ,&nbsp;Javiera Nally","doi":"10.1016/j.piro.2015.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To perform different dental procedures it is currently necessary to make a correct assessment of periodontal biotype, using the right tools that allow its thickness to be accurately measured. The objective of this study was to evaluate different diagnostic methods and correlating them with direct measurement of width and thickness of attached gingiva in the front upper jaw area. The study included 30 periodontally healthy patients, in whom biotype identification was performed on teeth 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3, using visual parameters, direct measurement of the width and attached gingiva thickness, and transparency of the periodontal probe as an indirect method. According to the transparency of the probe, the thick biotype was the most frequent (53.3%) was observed more in men (62.5%) than women (37.50%). According to the visual parameters, thin biotype was more prevalent (56.7%) than the thick biotype (43.3%). There were no significant differences on comparing the 2 methods. The mean width of attached gingiva was 2.79<!--> <!-->mm and a thickness of 1.06<!--> <!-->mm, being greater in the thick biotype (width 2.94<!--> <!-->mm and thickness 1.10) than in the thin biotype (width 2.67<!--> <!-->mm and thickness 1.01<!--> <!-->mm). According to the results, it can be concluded that both the visual diagnosis and transparency of the probe are valid to identify the gingival biotype. However, a lower reproducibility by visual inspection was observed, and the thin biotype showed a higher error rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21203,"journal":{"name":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 192-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2015.07.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0718539115000713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

为了进行不同的牙科手术,目前有必要使用正确的工具对牙周生物型进行正确的评估,以准确测量其厚度。本研究的目的是评估不同的诊断方法,并将其与直接测量上颌前区附着龈的宽度和厚度进行比较。本研究纳入30例牙周健康患者,采用视觉参数、直接测量牙周宽度和附着龈厚度、间接测量牙周探针透明度的方法对1.1、1.2和1.3牙进行生物型鉴定。根据探针的透明度,厚型生物型最多(53.3%),男性(62.5%)多于女性(37.50%)。从视觉参数上看,薄型(56.7%)比厚型(43.3%)更为普遍。两种方法比较无显著差异。附着龈的平均宽度为2.79 mm,厚度为1.06 mm,粗大型(宽度2.94 mm,厚度1.10 mm)大于粗小型(宽度2.67 mm,厚度1.01 mm)。结果表明,无论是视觉诊断还是探针的透明度,都是鉴别牙龈生物型的有效方法。然而,通过目测观察到的再现性较低,薄生物型的错误率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlación entre biotipo gingival, ancho y grosor de encía adherida en zona estética del maxilar superior

To perform different dental procedures it is currently necessary to make a correct assessment of periodontal biotype, using the right tools that allow its thickness to be accurately measured. The objective of this study was to evaluate different diagnostic methods and correlating them with direct measurement of width and thickness of attached gingiva in the front upper jaw area. The study included 30 periodontally healthy patients, in whom biotype identification was performed on teeth 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3, using visual parameters, direct measurement of the width and attached gingiva thickness, and transparency of the periodontal probe as an indirect method. According to the transparency of the probe, the thick biotype was the most frequent (53.3%) was observed more in men (62.5%) than women (37.50%). According to the visual parameters, thin biotype was more prevalent (56.7%) than the thick biotype (43.3%). There were no significant differences on comparing the 2 methods. The mean width of attached gingiva was 2.79 mm and a thickness of 1.06 mm, being greater in the thick biotype (width 2.94 mm and thickness 1.10) than in the thin biotype (width 2.67 mm and thickness 1.01 mm). According to the results, it can be concluded that both the visual diagnosis and transparency of the probe are valid to identify the gingival biotype. However, a lower reproducibility by visual inspection was observed, and the thin biotype showed a higher error rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信