低碳电力的政治经济学:198个国家的治理效应

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Darrick Evensen , Benjamin K. Sovacool
{"title":"低碳电力的政治经济学:198个国家的治理效应","authors":"Darrick Evensen ,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Sovacool","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2023.114016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Which countries best foster low-carbon electricity transitions – authoritarian regimes or democratic societies? Crucial for understanding how transitions unfold is identifying contextual factors conditioning propensity to adopt specific forms of energy production. This research assesses the relationship between quality of governance within 198 countries and domestic electricity production from all major energy sources, across the years 2002–2020. Governance quality is measured via a range of comprehensive, internationally recognised metrics, focusing predominantly on the World Bank's worldwide governance indicators. The data reveal that a future, decarbonised electricity system via wind, solar, and/or nuclear appears most likely in countries where the traditions and institutions by which authority is exercised support good governance. Over the last two decades, the association between electricity from solar and wind and good governance has progressively strengthened globally. Beyond governance, national measures of economic (in)equality are strongly related to electricity production from nuclear and hydropower. These findings offer a point of departure for assessing how governance systems might predispose countries to particular energy choices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 114016"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123008742/pdfft?md5=9be1b8739f67e65d7d79bb44eaeb0512&pid=1-s2.0-S1364032123008742-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political economy of low-carbon electricity: Governance effects across 198 countries\",\"authors\":\"Darrick Evensen ,&nbsp;Benjamin K. Sovacool\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2023.114016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Which countries best foster low-carbon electricity transitions – authoritarian regimes or democratic societies? Crucial for understanding how transitions unfold is identifying contextual factors conditioning propensity to adopt specific forms of energy production. This research assesses the relationship between quality of governance within 198 countries and domestic electricity production from all major energy sources, across the years 2002–2020. Governance quality is measured via a range of comprehensive, internationally recognised metrics, focusing predominantly on the World Bank's worldwide governance indicators. The data reveal that a future, decarbonised electricity system via wind, solar, and/or nuclear appears most likely in countries where the traditions and institutions by which authority is exercised support good governance. Over the last two decades, the association between electricity from solar and wind and good governance has progressively strengthened globally. Beyond governance, national measures of economic (in)equality are strongly related to electricity production from nuclear and hydropower. These findings offer a point of departure for assessing how governance systems might predispose countries to particular energy choices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123008742/pdfft?md5=9be1b8739f67e65d7d79bb44eaeb0512&pid=1-s2.0-S1364032123008742-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123008742\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032123008742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哪个国家最能促进低碳电力转型——专制政权还是民主社会?理解转型如何展开的关键是确定影响采用特定能源生产形式倾向的环境因素。本研究评估了2002-2020年间198个国家的治理质量与所有主要能源的国内发电量之间的关系。治理质量是通过一系列全面的、国际公认的指标来衡量的,主要集中在世界银行的全球治理指标上。数据显示,未来通过风能、太阳能和/或核能实现的脱碳电力系统最有可能出现在那些行使权力的传统和机构支持良好治理的国家。在过去二十年中,太阳能和风能发电与良好治理之间的联系在全球范围内逐步加强。除了治理之外,国家经济平等的衡量标准与核能和水力发电密切相关。这些发现为评估治理体系如何使国家倾向于特定的能源选择提供了一个出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Political economy of low-carbon electricity: Governance effects across 198 countries

Political economy of low-carbon electricity: Governance effects across 198 countries

Which countries best foster low-carbon electricity transitions – authoritarian regimes or democratic societies? Crucial for understanding how transitions unfold is identifying contextual factors conditioning propensity to adopt specific forms of energy production. This research assesses the relationship between quality of governance within 198 countries and domestic electricity production from all major energy sources, across the years 2002–2020. Governance quality is measured via a range of comprehensive, internationally recognised metrics, focusing predominantly on the World Bank's worldwide governance indicators. The data reveal that a future, decarbonised electricity system via wind, solar, and/or nuclear appears most likely in countries where the traditions and institutions by which authority is exercised support good governance. Over the last two decades, the association between electricity from solar and wind and good governance has progressively strengthened globally. Beyond governance, national measures of economic (in)equality are strongly related to electricity production from nuclear and hydropower. These findings offer a point of departure for assessing how governance systems might predispose countries to particular energy choices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信