Jessie Siew-Pin Leuk, Kai-En Yow, Clenyce Zi-Xin Tan, Ashlee M Hendy, Mika Kar-Wing Tan, Tommy Hock-Beng Ng, Wei-Peng Teo
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激参数对健康老年人和帕金森病患者上肢运动学习影响的meta分析综述","authors":"Jessie Siew-Pin Leuk, Kai-En Yow, Clenyce Zi-Xin Tan, Ashlee M Hendy, Mika Kar-Wing Tan, Tommy Hock-Beng Ng, Wei-Peng Teo","doi":"10.1515/revneuro-2022-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current literature lacks consolidated evidence for the impact of stimulation parameters on the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in enhancing upper limb motor learning. Hence, we aim to synthesise available methodologies and results to guide future research on the usage of tDCS on upper limb motor learning, specifically in older adults and Parkinson's disease (PD). Thirty-two studies (Healthy older adults, <i>N</i> = 526, <i>M</i> = 67.25, SD = 4.30 years; PD, <i>N</i> = 216, <i>M</i> = 66.62, SD = 6.25 years) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies consisted of active and sham protocols. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted for (i) subjects (healthy older adults and PD); (ii) intensity (1.0, 1.5, 2 mA); (iii) electrode montage (unilateral anodal, bilateral anodal, unilateral cathodal); (iv) stimulation site (cerebellum, frontal, motor, premotor, SMA, somatosensory); (v) protocol (online, offline). Significant tDCS effect on motor learning was reported for both populations, intensity 1.0 and 2.0 mA, unilateral anodal and cathodal stimulation, stimulation site of the motor and premotor cortex, and both online and offline protocols. Regression showed no significant relationship between tDCS effects and density. The efficacy of tDCS is also not affected by the number of sessions. However, studies that reported only single session tDCS found significant negative association between duration with motor learning outcomes. Our findings suggest that different stimulation parameters enhanced upper limb motor learning in older adults and PD. Future research should combine tDCS with neuroimaging techniques to help with optimisation of the stimulation parameters, considering the type of task and population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49623,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","volume":"34 3","pages":"325-348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analytical review of transcranial direct current stimulation parameters on upper limb motor learning in healthy older adults and people with Parkinson's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jessie Siew-Pin Leuk, Kai-En Yow, Clenyce Zi-Xin Tan, Ashlee M Hendy, Mika Kar-Wing Tan, Tommy Hock-Beng Ng, Wei-Peng Teo\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/revneuro-2022-0073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current literature lacks consolidated evidence for the impact of stimulation parameters on the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in enhancing upper limb motor learning. Hence, we aim to synthesise available methodologies and results to guide future research on the usage of tDCS on upper limb motor learning, specifically in older adults and Parkinson's disease (PD). Thirty-two studies (Healthy older adults, <i>N</i> = 526, <i>M</i> = 67.25, SD = 4.30 years; PD, <i>N</i> = 216, <i>M</i> = 66.62, SD = 6.25 years) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies consisted of active and sham protocols. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted for (i) subjects (healthy older adults and PD); (ii) intensity (1.0, 1.5, 2 mA); (iii) electrode montage (unilateral anodal, bilateral anodal, unilateral cathodal); (iv) stimulation site (cerebellum, frontal, motor, premotor, SMA, somatosensory); (v) protocol (online, offline). Significant tDCS effect on motor learning was reported for both populations, intensity 1.0 and 2.0 mA, unilateral anodal and cathodal stimulation, stimulation site of the motor and premotor cortex, and both online and offline protocols. Regression showed no significant relationship between tDCS effects and density. The efficacy of tDCS is also not affected by the number of sessions. However, studies that reported only single session tDCS found significant negative association between duration with motor learning outcomes. Our findings suggest that different stimulation parameters enhanced upper limb motor learning in older adults and PD. Future research should combine tDCS with neuroimaging techniques to help with optimisation of the stimulation parameters, considering the type of task and population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in the Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"325-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in the Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2022-0073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2022-0073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目前文献缺乏关于刺激参数对经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)增强上肢运动学习效果影响的确凿证据。因此,我们的目标是综合现有的方法和结果来指导tDCS在上肢运动学习中的应用,特别是在老年人和帕金森病(PD)中的应用。32项研究(健康老年人,N = 526, M = 67.25, SD = 4.30;PD (N = 216, M = 66.62, SD = 6.25)纳入meta分析。所有纳入的研究包括积极和虚假方案。随机效应荟萃分析(i)受试者(健康老年人和帕金森病);(ii)强度(1.0、1.5、2 mA);(iii)电极蒙太奇(单侧阳极、双侧阳极、单侧阴极);(iv)刺激部位(小脑、额叶、运动、前运动、SMA、体感);(v)协议(在线、离线)。tDCS对运动学习的影响在人群、强度1.0和2.0 mA、单侧阳极和阴极刺激、运动和运动前皮层刺激部位以及在线和离线方案下均有显著影响。回归显示tDCS效应与密度无显著相关。tDCS的效果也不受治疗次数的影响。然而,仅报告单次tDCS的研究发现,持续时间与运动学习结果之间存在显著的负相关。我们的研究结果表明,不同的刺激参数增强了老年人和PD的上肢运动学习。未来的研究应结合tDCS与神经成像技术,以帮助优化刺激参数,考虑到任务类型和人群。
A meta-analytical review of transcranial direct current stimulation parameters on upper limb motor learning in healthy older adults and people with Parkinson's disease.
Current literature lacks consolidated evidence for the impact of stimulation parameters on the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in enhancing upper limb motor learning. Hence, we aim to synthesise available methodologies and results to guide future research on the usage of tDCS on upper limb motor learning, specifically in older adults and Parkinson's disease (PD). Thirty-two studies (Healthy older adults, N = 526, M = 67.25, SD = 4.30 years; PD, N = 216, M = 66.62, SD = 6.25 years) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies consisted of active and sham protocols. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted for (i) subjects (healthy older adults and PD); (ii) intensity (1.0, 1.5, 2 mA); (iii) electrode montage (unilateral anodal, bilateral anodal, unilateral cathodal); (iv) stimulation site (cerebellum, frontal, motor, premotor, SMA, somatosensory); (v) protocol (online, offline). Significant tDCS effect on motor learning was reported for both populations, intensity 1.0 and 2.0 mA, unilateral anodal and cathodal stimulation, stimulation site of the motor and premotor cortex, and both online and offline protocols. Regression showed no significant relationship between tDCS effects and density. The efficacy of tDCS is also not affected by the number of sessions. However, studies that reported only single session tDCS found significant negative association between duration with motor learning outcomes. Our findings suggest that different stimulation parameters enhanced upper limb motor learning in older adults and PD. Future research should combine tDCS with neuroimaging techniques to help with optimisation of the stimulation parameters, considering the type of task and population.
期刊介绍:
Reviews in the Neurosciences provides a forum for reviews, critical evaluations and theoretical treatment of selective topics in the neurosciences. The journal is meant to provide an authoritative reference work for those interested in the structure and functions of the nervous system at all levels of analysis, including the genetic, molecular, cellular, behavioral, cognitive and clinical neurosciences. Contributions should contain a critical appraisal of specific areas and not simply a compilation of published articles.