与非救援犬相比,救援犬在行为、认知能力和个性方面几乎没有什么不同

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
John O’Riordan, Lina S.V. Roth
{"title":"与非救援犬相比,救援犬在行为、认知能力和个性方面几乎没有什么不同","authors":"John O’Riordan,&nbsp;Lina S.V. Roth","doi":"10.1016/j.jveb.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated differences in behavior and cognition between rescue dogs and non-rescue dogs using a series of cognitive tests. These tests were simple enough that they could be performed by owners in their own homes. Therefore, citizen science was used to collect behavioral data on rescue dogs (n = 30) and non-rescue dogs (n = 20). Owners of the dogs also completed questionnaires to assess the dog-owner relationship and personality of the dog. Results revealed that rescue dogs maintained eye contact for a significantly shorter duration compared to non-rescue dogs (U = 162.5, <em>P</em> = 0.029). However, they performed significantly better than non-rescue dogs in a simple memory test (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup>(1, N = 40) = 4.40, <em>P</em> = 0.036). Rescue dogs were significantly more fearful than non-rescue dogs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), but the groups did not differ in their dog-owner relationship questionnaire scores. Hence, there may be some differences between rescue and non-rescue dogs, and citizen science could be a viable method to collect behavioral data on rescue dogs after they are rehomed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17567,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823001211/pdfft?md5=15f978a353e09465c1d9427eb09df89a&pid=1-s2.0-S1558787823001211-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rescue dogs show few differences in behavior, cognitive abilities, and personality compared with non-rescue dogs\",\"authors\":\"John O’Riordan,&nbsp;Lina S.V. Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jveb.2023.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigated differences in behavior and cognition between rescue dogs and non-rescue dogs using a series of cognitive tests. These tests were simple enough that they could be performed by owners in their own homes. Therefore, citizen science was used to collect behavioral data on rescue dogs (n = 30) and non-rescue dogs (n = 20). Owners of the dogs also completed questionnaires to assess the dog-owner relationship and personality of the dog. Results revealed that rescue dogs maintained eye contact for a significantly shorter duration compared to non-rescue dogs (U = 162.5, <em>P</em> = 0.029). However, they performed significantly better than non-rescue dogs in a simple memory test (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup>(1, N = 40) = 4.40, <em>P</em> = 0.036). Rescue dogs were significantly more fearful than non-rescue dogs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), but the groups did not differ in their dog-owner relationship questionnaire scores. Hence, there may be some differences between rescue and non-rescue dogs, and citizen science could be a viable method to collect behavioral data on rescue dogs after they are rehomed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 42-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823001211/pdfft?md5=15f978a353e09465c1d9427eb09df89a&pid=1-s2.0-S1558787823001211-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823001211\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787823001211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究通过一系列认知测试来研究救援犬和非救援犬在行为和认知方面的差异。这些测试非常简单,业主可以在自己家中进行。因此,采用公民科学的方法收集救援犬(n = 30)和非救援犬(n = 20)的行为数据。狗的主人还完成了问卷调查,以评估狗主人的关系和狗的个性。结果显示,与非救援犬相比,救援犬保持眼神接触的时间明显更短(U = 162.5,P = 0.029)。然而,在简单记忆测试中,它们的表现明显优于非救援犬(χ2(1, N = 40) = 4.40,P = 0.036)。救援犬明显比非救援犬更害怕(P < 0.05),但两组在狗主人关系问卷得分上没有差异。因此,救援犬和非救援犬之间可能存在一些差异,公民科学可能是一种可行的方法,可以收集救援犬在被重新安置后的行为数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rescue dogs show few differences in behavior, cognitive abilities, and personality compared with non-rescue dogs

This study investigated differences in behavior and cognition between rescue dogs and non-rescue dogs using a series of cognitive tests. These tests were simple enough that they could be performed by owners in their own homes. Therefore, citizen science was used to collect behavioral data on rescue dogs (n = 30) and non-rescue dogs (n = 20). Owners of the dogs also completed questionnaires to assess the dog-owner relationship and personality of the dog. Results revealed that rescue dogs maintained eye contact for a significantly shorter duration compared to non-rescue dogs (U = 162.5, P = 0.029). However, they performed significantly better than non-rescue dogs in a simple memory test (χ2(1, N = 40) = 4.40, P = 0.036). Rescue dogs were significantly more fearful than non-rescue dogs (P < 0.05), but the groups did not differ in their dog-owner relationship questionnaire scores. Hence, there may be some differences between rescue and non-rescue dogs, and citizen science could be a viable method to collect behavioral data on rescue dogs after they are rehomed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
325 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research is an international journal that focuses on all aspects of veterinary behavioral medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical applications and research. Articles cover such topics as basic research involving normal signaling or social behaviors, welfare and/or housing issues, molecular or quantitative genetics, and applied behavioral issues (eg, working dogs) that may have implications for clinical interest or assessment. JVEB is the official journal of the Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, the British Veterinary Behaviour Association, Gesellschaft fr Tierverhaltensmedizin und Therapie, the International Working Dog Breeding Association, the Pet Professional Guild, the Association Veterinaire Suisse pour la Medecine Comportementale, and The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信