{"title":"主动脉瓣疾病的解剖学特征:经导管主动脉瓣置换术的意义","authors":"Yanren Peng, Xiaorong Shu, Yongqing Lin, Weibin Huang, Shuwan Xu, Jianming Zheng, Ruqiong Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The etiology of aortic stenosis (AS) significantly impacts transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation, with rheumatic etiology posing challenges. The concept of valve anchoring during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to investigate the clinical and CT anatomical characteristics of various aortic valve diseases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent CT for severe aortic diseases between April 2019 and February 2023. CT analysis was performed in eight anatomical landmarks: left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic annulus, sinus of Valsalva (SOV), sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AAO), coronary height, aortic angle, and aortic valve calcification volume.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>121 patients with severe aortic valve disease were included, divided into AS (71 cases, 59%) and AR (50 cases, 41%) groups. In patients with AR, the absolute diameters of the annulus, LVOT, SOV, STJ, and AAO, as well as the heights of SOV and STJ and the cardiac angle, are larger than those in patients with AS (all <em>P</em> < 0.05). In normalized aortic root dimensions, the AR group had a higher SOV and STJ diameter-to-annulus ratio than the AS group (STJ-SOV-annulus: 1.51–1.44–1.00 vs 1.33–1.28–1.00). The bicuspid and rheumatic AS groups had smaller sinuses (STJ-SOV-annulus:1.27–1.35–1.00, 1.17–1.30–1.00, respectively), necessitating the downsizing of the THV. For 74% of AR patients, the sinotubular junction could not be used as a second anchoring zone, and anchoring relied primarily on the annulus.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with rheumatic etiology require smaller valves, and anchoring in AR patients depends on the valve annulus. These structural characteristics will influence TAVR selection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100532"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000588/pdfft?md5=b68b6ca920ffe5fc5db2b20b2bb2b412&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047723000588-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomical characteristics of aortic valve diseases: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement\",\"authors\":\"Yanren Peng, Xiaorong Shu, Yongqing Lin, Weibin Huang, Shuwan Xu, Jianming Zheng, Ruqiong Nie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The etiology of aortic stenosis (AS) significantly impacts transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation, with rheumatic etiology posing challenges. The concept of valve anchoring during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to investigate the clinical and CT anatomical characteristics of various aortic valve diseases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent CT for severe aortic diseases between April 2019 and February 2023. CT analysis was performed in eight anatomical landmarks: left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic annulus, sinus of Valsalva (SOV), sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AAO), coronary height, aortic angle, and aortic valve calcification volume.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>121 patients with severe aortic valve disease were included, divided into AS (71 cases, 59%) and AR (50 cases, 41%) groups. In patients with AR, the absolute diameters of the annulus, LVOT, SOV, STJ, and AAO, as well as the heights of SOV and STJ and the cardiac angle, are larger than those in patients with AS (all <em>P</em> < 0.05). In normalized aortic root dimensions, the AR group had a higher SOV and STJ diameter-to-annulus ratio than the AS group (STJ-SOV-annulus: 1.51–1.44–1.00 vs 1.33–1.28–1.00). The bicuspid and rheumatic AS groups had smaller sinuses (STJ-SOV-annulus:1.27–1.35–1.00, 1.17–1.30–1.00, respectively), necessitating the downsizing of the THV. For 74% of AR patients, the sinotubular junction could not be used as a second anchoring zone, and anchoring relied primarily on the annulus.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with rheumatic etiology require smaller valves, and anchoring in AR patients depends on the valve annulus. These structural characteristics will influence TAVR selection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000588/pdfft?md5=b68b6ca920ffe5fc5db2b20b2bb2b412&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047723000588-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的病因学对经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)植入术有重要影响,其中风湿病病因学提出了挑战。主动脉瓣反流(AR)患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中瓣膜锚定的概念尚不清楚。目的探讨各种主动脉瓣病变的临床及CT解剖特点。方法回顾性分析2019年4月至2023年2月连续行CT检查的重症主动脉病变患者。CT分析左室流出道(LVOT)、主动脉环、Valsalva窦(SOV)、窦管交界处(STJ)、升主动脉(AAO)、冠状动脉高度、主动脉角、主动脉瓣钙化体积等8个解剖标志。结果121例重度主动脉瓣病变患者分为AS组(71例,59%)和AR组(50例,41%)。AR患者的环、LVOT、SOV、STJ、AAO的绝对直径以及SOV、STJ的高度和心角均大于as患者(P <0.05)。在标准化主动脉根部尺寸方面,AR组SOV和STJ直径与环空比高于AS组(STJ-SOV-环空:1.51-1.44-1.00 vs 1.33-1.28-1.00)。二尖瓣AS组和风湿性AS组鼻窦较小(STJ-SOV-annulus分别为1.27-1.35-1.00、1.17-1.30-1.00),需要缩小THV。对于74%的AR患者,窦小管交界处不能作为第二锚定区,锚定主要依赖于环空。结论风湿病患者需要更小的瓣膜,AR患者的锚定取决于瓣膜环。这些结构特征将影响TAVR的选择。
Anatomical characteristics of aortic valve diseases: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Background
The etiology of aortic stenosis (AS) significantly impacts transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation, with rheumatic etiology posing challenges. The concept of valve anchoring during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) remains unclear.
Objective
This study aims to investigate the clinical and CT anatomical characteristics of various aortic valve diseases.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent CT for severe aortic diseases between April 2019 and February 2023. CT analysis was performed in eight anatomical landmarks: left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), aortic annulus, sinus of Valsalva (SOV), sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AAO), coronary height, aortic angle, and aortic valve calcification volume.
Results
121 patients with severe aortic valve disease were included, divided into AS (71 cases, 59%) and AR (50 cases, 41%) groups. In patients with AR, the absolute diameters of the annulus, LVOT, SOV, STJ, and AAO, as well as the heights of SOV and STJ and the cardiac angle, are larger than those in patients with AS (all P < 0.05). In normalized aortic root dimensions, the AR group had a higher SOV and STJ diameter-to-annulus ratio than the AS group (STJ-SOV-annulus: 1.51–1.44–1.00 vs 1.33–1.28–1.00). The bicuspid and rheumatic AS groups had smaller sinuses (STJ-SOV-annulus:1.27–1.35–1.00, 1.17–1.30–1.00, respectively), necessitating the downsizing of the THV. For 74% of AR patients, the sinotubular junction could not be used as a second anchoring zone, and anchoring relied primarily on the annulus.
Conclusions
Patients with rheumatic etiology require smaller valves, and anchoring in AR patients depends on the valve annulus. These structural characteristics will influence TAVR selection.