成人感知体育素养问卷的编制

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Peter Holler , Johannes Carl , Mireille N.M. van Poppel , Johannes Jaunig
{"title":"成人感知体育素养问卷的编制","authors":"Peter Holler ,&nbsp;Johannes Carl ,&nbsp;Mireille N.M. van Poppel ,&nbsp;Johannes Jaunig","doi":"10.1016/j.jesf.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objective</h3><p>In physical literacy (PL) research, instruments for the adult population covering all relevant domians are currently lacking in German language. Therefore, the Perceived Physical Literacy Questionnaire (PPLQ) was developed as an assessment instrument of PL for the adult population. The purpose of this study is to describe the multistage development process leading to the aim to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PPLQ.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Based on established questionnaires (subscales) operationalizing the six defined PL domains (motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge, understanding, and physical activity behavior), we generated a large item pool. Exploratory analyses on survey data (n = 506), compelemented through an expert panel, served to identify the best fitting items. Cognitive interviews (n = 7) and a language certification process (level A2) helped to enhance the content validity of the items. Finally, we assessed the hypothesized factor structure of the PPLQ and its convergent validity with the Physical Activity-related Health Competence (PAHCO) questionnaire in a second independent sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Valid data of 417 adults (66% women, 48 ± 16 years) entered the confirmatory factor analysis. We found empirical support for a theory-compatible 24-item version, after reducing complexity (i.e., domain subscales). Additionally, the six domains could be subsumed under an overall factor for PL (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>247</sub> = 450.70, χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.83, CFI<sub>Robust</sub> = 0.895, RMSEA<sub>Robust</sub> = 0.074 [CI<sub>90</sub> = 0.063–0.085], SRMR = 0.064). Factor loadings, composite reliability, and discriminant validity were sufficient, while acceptable convergent validity was achieved for the total PL score and three domains.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The 24-item version of the PPLQ is appropriate for assessing PL among adults. However, some items (especially in the knowledge domain) can benefit from refinement in further studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness","volume":"21 4","pages":"Pages 424-433"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X23000473/pdfft?md5=7024ed72820ea16eebfdc27ccf21941b&pid=1-s2.0-S1728869X23000473-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Perceived Physical Literacy Questionnaire (PPLQ) for the adult population\",\"authors\":\"Peter Holler ,&nbsp;Johannes Carl ,&nbsp;Mireille N.M. van Poppel ,&nbsp;Johannes Jaunig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jesf.2023.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/objective</h3><p>In physical literacy (PL) research, instruments for the adult population covering all relevant domians are currently lacking in German language. Therefore, the Perceived Physical Literacy Questionnaire (PPLQ) was developed as an assessment instrument of PL for the adult population. The purpose of this study is to describe the multistage development process leading to the aim to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PPLQ.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Based on established questionnaires (subscales) operationalizing the six defined PL domains (motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge, understanding, and physical activity behavior), we generated a large item pool. Exploratory analyses on survey data (n = 506), compelemented through an expert panel, served to identify the best fitting items. Cognitive interviews (n = 7) and a language certification process (level A2) helped to enhance the content validity of the items. Finally, we assessed the hypothesized factor structure of the PPLQ and its convergent validity with the Physical Activity-related Health Competence (PAHCO) questionnaire in a second independent sample.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Valid data of 417 adults (66% women, 48 ± 16 years) entered the confirmatory factor analysis. We found empirical support for a theory-compatible 24-item version, after reducing complexity (i.e., domain subscales). Additionally, the six domains could be subsumed under an overall factor for PL (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>247</sub> = 450.70, χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.83, CFI<sub>Robust</sub> = 0.895, RMSEA<sub>Robust</sub> = 0.074 [CI<sub>90</sub> = 0.063–0.085], SRMR = 0.064). Factor loadings, composite reliability, and discriminant validity were sufficient, while acceptable convergent validity was achieved for the total PL score and three domains.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The 24-item version of the PPLQ is appropriate for assessing PL among adults. However, some items (especially in the knowledge domain) can benefit from refinement in further studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 424-433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X23000473/pdfft?md5=7024ed72820ea16eebfdc27ccf21941b&pid=1-s2.0-S1728869X23000473-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X23000473\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X23000473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的在体育素养(PL)研究中,目前缺乏涵盖所有相关领域的成年人的德语工具。因此,本研究开发了体能素质感知问卷(PPLQ)作为成人体能素质的评估工具。本研究的目的是描述多阶段的发展过程,从而达到评估PPLQ的心理测量特性的目的。方法基于已建立的问卷(子量表),将六个定义的PL领域(动机、信心、身体能力、知识、理解和身体活动行为)操作化,我们生成了一个大型题库。对调查数据(n = 506)进行探索性分析,通过专家小组进行补充,以确定最佳拟合项目。认知访谈(n = 7)和语言认证过程(A2级)有助于提高项目的内容效度。最后,我们在第二个独立样本中评估了PPLQ的假设因素结构及其与体育活动相关健康能力(PAHCO)问卷的收敛效度。结果417例成人有效资料(女性66%,48±16岁)进入验证性因子分析。在降低复杂性(即领域子尺度)之后,我们发现了一个理论兼容的24项版本的经验支持。此外,这6个域可以归为PL的总体因子(χ2247 = 450.70, χ2/df = 1.83, CFIRobust = 0.895, RMSEARobust = 0.074 [CI90 = 0.063-0.085], SRMR = 0.064)。因子负荷、复合信度和判别效度是足够的,而总PL得分和三个领域的收敛效度是可以接受的。结论24项PPLQ量表适用于成人生活质量的评估。然而,有些项目(特别是在知识领域)可以从进一步研究的细化中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the Perceived Physical Literacy Questionnaire (PPLQ) for the adult population

Background/objective

In physical literacy (PL) research, instruments for the adult population covering all relevant domians are currently lacking in German language. Therefore, the Perceived Physical Literacy Questionnaire (PPLQ) was developed as an assessment instrument of PL for the adult population. The purpose of this study is to describe the multistage development process leading to the aim to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PPLQ.

Methods

Based on established questionnaires (subscales) operationalizing the six defined PL domains (motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge, understanding, and physical activity behavior), we generated a large item pool. Exploratory analyses on survey data (n = 506), compelemented through an expert panel, served to identify the best fitting items. Cognitive interviews (n = 7) and a language certification process (level A2) helped to enhance the content validity of the items. Finally, we assessed the hypothesized factor structure of the PPLQ and its convergent validity with the Physical Activity-related Health Competence (PAHCO) questionnaire in a second independent sample.

Results

Valid data of 417 adults (66% women, 48 ± 16 years) entered the confirmatory factor analysis. We found empirical support for a theory-compatible 24-item version, after reducing complexity (i.e., domain subscales). Additionally, the six domains could be subsumed under an overall factor for PL (χ2247 = 450.70, χ2/df = 1.83, CFIRobust = 0.895, RMSEARobust = 0.074 [CI90 = 0.063–0.085], SRMR = 0.064). Factor loadings, composite reliability, and discriminant validity were sufficient, while acceptable convergent validity was achieved for the total PL score and three domains.

Conclusion

The 24-item version of the PPLQ is appropriate for assessing PL among adults. However, some items (especially in the knowledge domain) can benefit from refinement in further studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness is the official peer-reviewed journal of The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness (SCSEPF), the Physical Fitness Association of Hong Kong, China (HKPFA), and the Hong Kong Association of Sports Medicine and Sports Science (HKASMSS). It is published twice a year, in June and December, by Elsevier. The Journal accepts original investigations, comprehensive reviews, case studies and short communications on current topics in exercise science, physical fitness and physical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信