双相情感障碍父母与对照组儿童神经认知特征的比较:一项横断面研究

Q3 Medicine
Sara Fernanda Restrepo-Mejía , Johanna Valencia-Echeverry , Juan Pablo Zapata-Ospina , Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo , Carlos Lopez-Jaramillo , Juan David Palacio-Ortiz
{"title":"双相情感障碍父母与对照组儿童神经认知特征的比较:一项横断面研究","authors":"Sara Fernanda Restrepo-Mejía ,&nbsp;Johanna Valencia-Echeverry ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Zapata-Ospina ,&nbsp;Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo ,&nbsp;Carlos Lopez-Jaramillo ,&nbsp;Juan David Palacio-Ortiz","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Studies that have compared the cognitive alterations of the children of parents with bipolar disorder (CPBD) versus the children of control parents (CCP), present heterogeneous results due to the studies’ methodological differences, the age of the population studied, and the lack of standardisation of the measures used for the different neurocognitive domains. The objective was to compare the neurocognitive profile of CPBD versus CCP to observe if there are differences that could be proposed as possible endophenotypes of BD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 107 individuals (51 CPBD, and 56 CCP) with ages between 6 and 16 (mean, 12.2±<!--> <!-->2.80) years of age were evaluated. Seventy-four point five percent of the CPBD group had some disorder compared to 67.9% of the CCP group. Tests such as letter-F phonemic verbal fluency, letter-S phonemic verbal fluency, overall F-A-S phonemic verbal fluency, story recall and retrieval, and Wisconsin perseverative errors showed a difference with a small effect size, but with a high degree of uncertainty.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CPBD did not have differences in their neurocognitive profile in comparison with CCP. Both groups have a high prevalence of psychopathology, which is a factor that could explain the lack of differences in neurocognitive performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 320-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación del Perfil Neurocognitivo de los Hijos de Padres con Trastorno Bipolar y Controles: un Estudio de Corte Transversal\",\"authors\":\"Sara Fernanda Restrepo-Mejía ,&nbsp;Johanna Valencia-Echeverry ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Zapata-Ospina ,&nbsp;Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo ,&nbsp;Carlos Lopez-Jaramillo ,&nbsp;Juan David Palacio-Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Studies that have compared the cognitive alterations of the children of parents with bipolar disorder (CPBD) versus the children of control parents (CCP), present heterogeneous results due to the studies’ methodological differences, the age of the population studied, and the lack of standardisation of the measures used for the different neurocognitive domains. The objective was to compare the neurocognitive profile of CPBD versus CCP to observe if there are differences that could be proposed as possible endophenotypes of BD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 107 individuals (51 CPBD, and 56 CCP) with ages between 6 and 16 (mean, 12.2±<!--> <!-->2.80) years of age were evaluated. Seventy-four point five percent of the CPBD group had some disorder compared to 67.9% of the CCP group. Tests such as letter-F phonemic verbal fluency, letter-S phonemic verbal fluency, overall F-A-S phonemic verbal fluency, story recall and retrieval, and Wisconsin perseverative errors showed a difference with a small effect size, but with a high degree of uncertainty.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CPBD did not have differences in their neurocognitive profile in comparison with CCP. Both groups have a high prevalence of psychopathology, which is a factor that could explain the lack of differences in neurocognitive performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 320-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021001396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021001396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究比较了双相情感障碍(CPBD)父母的孩子与正常父母(CCP)的孩子的认知改变,由于研究方法的差异,研究人群的年龄,以及不同神经认知领域使用的测量缺乏标准化,研究结果不一致。目的是比较CPBD与CCP的神经认知特征,以观察是否存在可能作为bd内表型的差异。结果共评估了107例患者(51例CPBD, 56例CCP),年龄在6 ~ 16岁(平均12.2±2.80)岁。CPBD组中有75.5%的人患有某种疾病,而CCP组中这一比例为67.9%。诸如字母f音位语言流畅性、字母s音位语言流畅性、整体F-A-S音位语言流畅性、故事回忆和检索以及威斯康星持久性错误等测试显示了小效应量的差异,但具有高度的不确定性。结论CPBD与CCP在神经认知方面无显著差异。两组人都有很高的精神病理学患病率,这是一个可以解释神经认知表现缺乏差异的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparación del Perfil Neurocognitivo de los Hijos de Padres con Trastorno Bipolar y Controles: un Estudio de Corte Transversal

Introduction

Studies that have compared the cognitive alterations of the children of parents with bipolar disorder (CPBD) versus the children of control parents (CCP), present heterogeneous results due to the studies’ methodological differences, the age of the population studied, and the lack of standardisation of the measures used for the different neurocognitive domains. The objective was to compare the neurocognitive profile of CPBD versus CCP to observe if there are differences that could be proposed as possible endophenotypes of BD.

Results

A total of 107 individuals (51 CPBD, and 56 CCP) with ages between 6 and 16 (mean, 12.2± 2.80) years of age were evaluated. Seventy-four point five percent of the CPBD group had some disorder compared to 67.9% of the CCP group. Tests such as letter-F phonemic verbal fluency, letter-S phonemic verbal fluency, overall F-A-S phonemic verbal fluency, story recall and retrieval, and Wisconsin perseverative errors showed a difference with a small effect size, but with a high degree of uncertainty.

Conclusions

The CPBD did not have differences in their neurocognitive profile in comparison with CCP. Both groups have a high prevalence of psychopathology, which is a factor that could explain the lack of differences in neurocognitive performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信