风险与非风险金融投资及认知

IF 2.5 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Nicolau Martin-Bassols
{"title":"风险与非风险金融投资及认知","authors":"Nicolau Martin-Bassols","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2023.102677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Much policy attention has been placed on encouraging saving behaviours to avoid financial deprivation at older adulthood. However, optimising financial investments is highly dependent on cognitive capacity, which can be deteriorated by the natural ageing process. This paper explores the relationship between age-related cognitive deterioration with risky and non-risky financial investments. The data analysed comes from eight waves (2002 to 2019) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) which, for a nationally representative sample, contains information about cognitive ability and their ownership of financial investments over time. Cognition emerges as one of the strongest predictors of the type and number of financial products that individuals hold. Specifically, the results show a positive relation of cognitive level with risky and non-risky financial investments. Even alongside other important factors – such as education, labour status, age, and household wealth – the explanatory power of cognition is found to be significant at the 0.1% significance level. The results are robust when accounting for unobservables and when using a genetic measure of cognition as main explanatory variable. More importantly, cognitive deterioration is only significantly associated with risky financial investments. That means, individuals reduce their risky financial investments when they start suffering old age related cognitive deterioration, while they do not change their holdings in non-risky ones in a significant manner. There are also no significant differences in the reactions to stock-market fluctuations due to cognitive level. In other words, individuals react to stock market fluctuations changing their financial holdings, but those reactions do not differ due to their cognitive level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Psychology","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 102677"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risky and non-risky financial investments and cognition\",\"authors\":\"Nicolau Martin-Bassols\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joep.2023.102677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Much policy attention has been placed on encouraging saving behaviours to avoid financial deprivation at older adulthood. However, optimising financial investments is highly dependent on cognitive capacity, which can be deteriorated by the natural ageing process. This paper explores the relationship between age-related cognitive deterioration with risky and non-risky financial investments. The data analysed comes from eight waves (2002 to 2019) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) which, for a nationally representative sample, contains information about cognitive ability and their ownership of financial investments over time. Cognition emerges as one of the strongest predictors of the type and number of financial products that individuals hold. Specifically, the results show a positive relation of cognitive level with risky and non-risky financial investments. Even alongside other important factors – such as education, labour status, age, and household wealth – the explanatory power of cognition is found to be significant at the 0.1% significance level. The results are robust when accounting for unobservables and when using a genetic measure of cognition as main explanatory variable. More importantly, cognitive deterioration is only significantly associated with risky financial investments. That means, individuals reduce their risky financial investments when they start suffering old age related cognitive deterioration, while they do not change their holdings in non-risky ones in a significant manner. There are also no significant differences in the reactions to stock-market fluctuations due to cognitive level. In other words, individuals react to stock market fluctuations changing their financial holdings, but those reactions do not differ due to their cognitive level.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Psychology\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487023000788\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167487023000788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多政策关注鼓励储蓄行为,以避免老年经济匮乏。然而,优化金融投资高度依赖于认知能力,而认知能力可能会因自然衰老过程而恶化。本文探讨了与年龄相关的认知退化与风险和非风险金融投资之间的关系。所分析的数据来自英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的八波(2002年至2019年),作为一个具有全国代表性的样本,该研究包含了有关认知能力及其随时间推移的金融投资所有权的信息。认知成为预测个人持有的金融产品类型和数量的最强因素之一。具体而言,结果显示认知水平与风险和非风险金融投资呈正相关。即使与其他重要因素(如教育、劳动状况、年龄和家庭财富)一起,认知的解释力在0.1%的显著性水平上也是显著的。当考虑到不可观察的因素和使用认知的遗传测量作为主要解释变量时,结果是稳健的。更重要的是,认知退化只与高风险的金融投资显著相关。这意味着,当个人开始遭受与老年相关的认知衰退时,他们会减少高风险的金融投资,而不会大幅改变他们在非风险投资方面的持有。在对股市波动的反应上,认知水平也没有显著差异。换句话说,个人对股票市场波动改变其金融资产的反应,但这些反应并不因他们的认知水平而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risky and non-risky financial investments and cognition

Much policy attention has been placed on encouraging saving behaviours to avoid financial deprivation at older adulthood. However, optimising financial investments is highly dependent on cognitive capacity, which can be deteriorated by the natural ageing process. This paper explores the relationship between age-related cognitive deterioration with risky and non-risky financial investments. The data analysed comes from eight waves (2002 to 2019) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) which, for a nationally representative sample, contains information about cognitive ability and their ownership of financial investments over time. Cognition emerges as one of the strongest predictors of the type and number of financial products that individuals hold. Specifically, the results show a positive relation of cognitive level with risky and non-risky financial investments. Even alongside other important factors – such as education, labour status, age, and household wealth – the explanatory power of cognition is found to be significant at the 0.1% significance level. The results are robust when accounting for unobservables and when using a genetic measure of cognition as main explanatory variable. More importantly, cognitive deterioration is only significantly associated with risky financial investments. That means, individuals reduce their risky financial investments when they start suffering old age related cognitive deterioration, while they do not change their holdings in non-risky ones in a significant manner. There are also no significant differences in the reactions to stock-market fluctuations due to cognitive level. In other words, individuals react to stock market fluctuations changing their financial holdings, but those reactions do not differ due to their cognitive level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
31.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to present research that will improve understanding of behavioral, in particular psychological, aspects of economic phenomena and processes. The Journal seeks to be a channel for the increased interest in using behavioral science methods for the study of economic behavior, and so to contribute to better solutions of societal problems, by stimulating new approaches and new theorizing about economic affairs. Economic psychology as a discipline studies the psychological mechanisms that underlie economic behavior. It deals with preferences, judgments, choices, economic interaction, and factors influencing these, as well as the consequences of judgements and decisions for economic processes and phenomena. This includes the impact of economic institutions upon human behavior and well-being. Studies in economic psychology may relate to different levels of aggregation, from the household and the individual consumer to the macro level of whole nations. Economic behavior in connection with inflation, unemployment, taxation, economic development, as well as consumer information and economic behavior in the market place are thus among the fields of interest. The journal also encourages submissions dealing with social interaction in economic contexts, like bargaining, negotiation, or group decision-making. The Journal of Economic Psychology contains: (a) novel reports of empirical (including: experimental) research on economic behavior; (b) replications studies; (c) assessments of the state of the art in economic psychology; (d) articles providing a theoretical perspective or a frame of reference for the study of economic behavior; (e) articles explaining the implications of theoretical developments for practical applications; (f) book reviews; (g) announcements of meetings, conferences and seminars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信