光生物调节耳疗法治疗颞下颌疾病的效果:一项双盲随机可行性研究

IF 3.261
Sara Lisboa Marques , Andressa Cristine da Silva Ramos , Érika Almeida Boggiss , Rosana Aparecida de Lima , Carina Ferreira Pinheiro-Araújo , Adriana Teresa Silva Santos , Andréia Maria Silva Vilela Terra
{"title":"光生物调节耳疗法治疗颞下颌疾病的效果:一项双盲随机可行性研究","authors":"Sara Lisboa Marques ,&nbsp;Andressa Cristine da Silva Ramos ,&nbsp;Érika Almeida Boggiss ,&nbsp;Rosana Aparecida de Lima ,&nbsp;Carina Ferreira Pinheiro-Araújo ,&nbsp;Adriana Teresa Silva Santos ,&nbsp;Andréia Maria Silva Vilela Terra","doi":"10.1016/j.jpap.2023.100210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are considered the most common complaint associaetd with orofacial pain. A treatment approach for TMD is photobiomodulation auriculotherapy, however, a method that which still requires studies mainly with pulsed frequency.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial using pulsed frequency photobiomodulation auriculotherapy and determine the relevant sample size.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was a controlled randomized pilot study. Twenty one volunteers with TMD were randomized into experimental and placebo groups. The evaluation periods were pre-intervention and again after four weeks. The instruments used for the assessment were axis I (mandibular movement measurements [MMM]) and axis II (Graded Chronic Pain Scale [GCPS], Jaw Functional Limitation Scale [JFLS-8], The Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-4], and Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7]) from Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for comparison of groups. The intervention protocol was performed once a week for foour weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The GCPS question about “pain at this exact moment” indicated lower values for the treated group compared to the placebo group (<em>U</em> = 15.50; <em>p</em> = 0.005) after the intervention. The calculation of the total sample was 22 volunteers. The JFLS-8 variable showed no difference between the groups and the sample calculation ranged from 39 to 281 volunteers. The MMM showed no difference between the groups, and the calculation of the necessary sample ranged from 27 to 2.317. The variable PHQ-4 (<em>U</em> = 21.00; <em>p</em> = 0.02) and GAD-7 (<em>U</em> = 20.00; <em>p</em> = 0.02) showed differences between groups with type I error. The required sample was 22 volunteers for PHQ-4 and 25 for GAD-7.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that this study is feasible and that the required sample should be 11 volunteers for each group in the GCPS subitem “pain intensity at this exact moment”. We were able to find results for this GCPS subitem. However, for other variables we need 25 volunteers for GAD7 and 22 volunteers for PHQ-4. Other variables, such as JFLS-8 and MMM, made it impossible to conduct these scales for future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2610,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469023000519/pdfft?md5=0a20a6411d401d9fd02519618898c164&pid=1-s2.0-S2666469023000519-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of photobiomodulation auriculotherapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: A double-blind randomized feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Sara Lisboa Marques ,&nbsp;Andressa Cristine da Silva Ramos ,&nbsp;Érika Almeida Boggiss ,&nbsp;Rosana Aparecida de Lima ,&nbsp;Carina Ferreira Pinheiro-Araújo ,&nbsp;Adriana Teresa Silva Santos ,&nbsp;Andréia Maria Silva Vilela Terra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpap.2023.100210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are considered the most common complaint associaetd with orofacial pain. A treatment approach for TMD is photobiomodulation auriculotherapy, however, a method that which still requires studies mainly with pulsed frequency.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial using pulsed frequency photobiomodulation auriculotherapy and determine the relevant sample size.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was a controlled randomized pilot study. Twenty one volunteers with TMD were randomized into experimental and placebo groups. The evaluation periods were pre-intervention and again after four weeks. The instruments used for the assessment were axis I (mandibular movement measurements [MMM]) and axis II (Graded Chronic Pain Scale [GCPS], Jaw Functional Limitation Scale [JFLS-8], The Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-4], and Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7]) from Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for comparison of groups. The intervention protocol was performed once a week for foour weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The GCPS question about “pain at this exact moment” indicated lower values for the treated group compared to the placebo group (<em>U</em> = 15.50; <em>p</em> = 0.005) after the intervention. The calculation of the total sample was 22 volunteers. The JFLS-8 variable showed no difference between the groups and the sample calculation ranged from 39 to 281 volunteers. The MMM showed no difference between the groups, and the calculation of the necessary sample ranged from 27 to 2.317. The variable PHQ-4 (<em>U</em> = 21.00; <em>p</em> = 0.02) and GAD-7 (<em>U</em> = 20.00; <em>p</em> = 0.02) showed differences between groups with type I error. The required sample was 22 volunteers for PHQ-4 and 25 for GAD-7.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that this study is feasible and that the required sample should be 11 volunteers for each group in the GCPS subitem “pain intensity at this exact moment”. We were able to find results for this GCPS subitem. However, for other variables we need 25 volunteers for GAD7 and 22 volunteers for PHQ-4. Other variables, such as JFLS-8 and MMM, made it impossible to conduct these scales for future studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2610,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469023000519/pdfft?md5=0a20a6411d401d9fd02519618898c164&pid=1-s2.0-S2666469023000519-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"2\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469023000519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469023000519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颞下颌紊乱(TMD)被认为是与口面部疼痛相关的最常见的主诉。一种治疗TMD的方法是光生物调节耳穴疗法,然而,这种方法仍然需要主要研究脉冲频率。目的评价脉冲频率光生物调节耳穴疗法进行随机临床试验的可行性,确定相关样本量。方法采用随机对照先导研究。21名患有TMD的志愿者被随机分为实验组和安慰剂组。评估期分别为干预前和干预四周后。用于评估的工具是轴I(下颌运动测量[MMM])和轴II(分级慢性疼痛量表[GCPS],颌骨功能限制量表[JFLS-8],患者健康问卷[PHQ-4]和广泛性焦虑障碍[GAD-7]),来自颞下颌疾病诊断标准(DC/TMD)。组间比较采用Mann-Whitney检验和Wilcoxon检验。干预方案每周一次,持续四周。结果GCPS关于“此时此刻疼痛”的问题,治疗组的数值低于安慰剂组(U = 15.50;P = 0.005)。计算样本总数为22名志愿者。JFLS-8变量显示各组之间没有差异,样本计算范围从39到281名志愿者。两组间的MMM值无差异,所需样本的计算范围为27 ~ 2.317。变量PHQ-4 (U = 21.00;p = 0.02)和GAD-7 (U = 20.00;p = 0.02)组间差异为I型误差。PHQ-4和GAD-7所需的样本分别为22名和25名志愿者。结论本研究是可行的,GCPS分项“此时此刻疼痛强度”每组需要11名志愿者。我们找到了这个GCPS子项的结果。然而,对于其他变量,我们需要25名志愿者参与GAD7和22名志愿者参与PHQ-4。其他变量,如JFLS-8和MMM,使这些量表无法用于未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of photobiomodulation auriculotherapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: A double-blind randomized feasibility study

Introduction

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are considered the most common complaint associaetd with orofacial pain. A treatment approach for TMD is photobiomodulation auriculotherapy, however, a method that which still requires studies mainly with pulsed frequency.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized clinical trial using pulsed frequency photobiomodulation auriculotherapy and determine the relevant sample size.

Methods

The study was a controlled randomized pilot study. Twenty one volunteers with TMD were randomized into experimental and placebo groups. The evaluation periods were pre-intervention and again after four weeks. The instruments used for the assessment were axis I (mandibular movement measurements [MMM]) and axis II (Graded Chronic Pain Scale [GCPS], Jaw Functional Limitation Scale [JFLS-8], The Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-4], and Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7]) from Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for comparison of groups. The intervention protocol was performed once a week for foour weeks.

Results

The GCPS question about “pain at this exact moment” indicated lower values for the treated group compared to the placebo group (U = 15.50; p = 0.005) after the intervention. The calculation of the total sample was 22 volunteers. The JFLS-8 variable showed no difference between the groups and the sample calculation ranged from 39 to 281 volunteers. The MMM showed no difference between the groups, and the calculation of the necessary sample ranged from 27 to 2.317. The variable PHQ-4 (U = 21.00; p = 0.02) and GAD-7 (U = 20.00; p = 0.02) showed differences between groups with type I error. The required sample was 22 volunteers for PHQ-4 and 25 for GAD-7.

Conclusion

We conclude that this study is feasible and that the required sample should be 11 volunteers for each group in the GCPS subitem “pain intensity at this exact moment”. We were able to find results for this GCPS subitem. However, for other variables we need 25 volunteers for GAD7 and 22 volunteers for PHQ-4. Other variables, such as JFLS-8 and MMM, made it impossible to conduct these scales for future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信