加拿大卫生保健专业人员在疼痛管理方面的持续专业发展需求:横断面调查。

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Craig M Dale, Iacopo Cioffi, Christine B Novak, Franklin Gorospe, Laura Murphy, Deepika Chugh, Judy Watt-Watson, Bonnie Stevens
{"title":"加拿大卫生保健专业人员在疼痛管理方面的持续专业发展需求:横断面调查。","authors":"Craig M Dale,&nbsp;Iacopo Cioffi,&nbsp;Christine B Novak,&nbsp;Franklin Gorospe,&nbsp;Laura Murphy,&nbsp;Deepika Chugh,&nbsp;Judy Watt-Watson,&nbsp;Bonnie Stevens","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2022.2150156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuing professional development is an important means of improving access to effective patient care. Although pain content has increased significantly in prelicensure programs, little is known about how postlicensure health professionals advance or maintain competence in pain management.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate Canadian health professionals' continuing professional development needs, activities, and preferred modalities for pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a cross-sectional self-report web survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 57% (230/400). Respondents were primarily nurses (48%), university educated (95%), employed in academic hospital settings (62%), and had ≥11 years postlicensure experience (70%). Most patients (>50%) cared for in an average week presented with pain. Compared to those working in nonacademic settings, clinicians in academic settings reported significantly higher acute pain assessment competence (mean 7.8/10 versus 6.9/10; <i>P</i> < 0.002) and greater access to pain specialist consultants (73% versus 29%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Chronic pain assessment competence was not different between groups. Top learning needs included neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal pain, and chronic pain. Recently completed and preferred learning modalities respectively were informal and work-based: reading journal articles (56%, 54%), online independent learning (44%, 53%), and attending hospital rounds (43%, 42%); 17% had not completed any pain learning activities in the past 12 months. Respondents employed in nonacademic settings and nonphysicians were more likely to use pocket cards, mobile apps, and e-mail summaries to improve pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Canadian postlicensure health professionals require greater access to and participation in interactive and multimodal methods of continuing professional development to facilitate competency in evidence-based pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"7 1","pages":"2150156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872952/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuing professional development needs in pain management for Canadian health care professionals: A cross sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Craig M Dale,&nbsp;Iacopo Cioffi,&nbsp;Christine B Novak,&nbsp;Franklin Gorospe,&nbsp;Laura Murphy,&nbsp;Deepika Chugh,&nbsp;Judy Watt-Watson,&nbsp;Bonnie Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24740527.2022.2150156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuing professional development is an important means of improving access to effective patient care. Although pain content has increased significantly in prelicensure programs, little is known about how postlicensure health professionals advance or maintain competence in pain management.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate Canadian health professionals' continuing professional development needs, activities, and preferred modalities for pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a cross-sectional self-report web survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 57% (230/400). Respondents were primarily nurses (48%), university educated (95%), employed in academic hospital settings (62%), and had ≥11 years postlicensure experience (70%). Most patients (>50%) cared for in an average week presented with pain. Compared to those working in nonacademic settings, clinicians in academic settings reported significantly higher acute pain assessment competence (mean 7.8/10 versus 6.9/10; <i>P</i> < 0.002) and greater access to pain specialist consultants (73% versus 29%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Chronic pain assessment competence was not different between groups. Top learning needs included neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal pain, and chronic pain. Recently completed and preferred learning modalities respectively were informal and work-based: reading journal articles (56%, 54%), online independent learning (44%, 53%), and attending hospital rounds (43%, 42%); 17% had not completed any pain learning activities in the past 12 months. Respondents employed in nonacademic settings and nonphysicians were more likely to use pocket cards, mobile apps, and e-mail summaries to improve pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Canadian postlicensure health professionals require greater access to and participation in interactive and multimodal methods of continuing professional development to facilitate competency in evidence-based pain management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"2150156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872952/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2022.2150156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2022.2150156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:持续的专业发展是改善获得有效病人护理的重要手段。虽然疼痛内容在执照前计划中显着增加,但很少有人知道执照后健康专业人员如何提高或保持疼痛管理的能力。目的:本研究的目的是调查加拿大卫生专业人员的持续专业发展需求、活动和首选的疼痛管理方式。方法:本研究采用横断面自述式网络调查。结果:调查回复率为57%(230/400)。受访者主要是护士(48%),大学学历(95%),在学术医院工作(62%),并具有≥11年的执照后工作经验(70%)。大多数患者(>50%)在平均一周内出现疼痛。与在非学术环境中工作的临床医生相比,学术环境中的临床医生报告的急性疼痛评估能力明显更高(平均7.8/10比6.9/10;P < 0.002),更容易获得疼痛专家咨询(73%对29%;P < 0.0001)。两组间慢性疼痛评估能力无显著差异。最主要的学习需求包括神经性疼痛、肌肉骨骼疼痛和慢性疼痛。最近完成的和首选的学习方式分别是非正式的和基于工作的:阅读期刊文章(56%,54%),在线独立学习(44%,53%)和参加医院查房(43%,42%);17%的患者在过去12个月内没有完成任何疼痛学习活动。受雇于非学术机构和非医生的受访者更有可能使用口袋卡、移动应用程序和电子邮件摘要来改善疼痛管理。结论:加拿大获得执照后的卫生专业人员需要更多的机会和参与互动和多模式的持续专业发展方法,以促进循证疼痛管理的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Continuing professional development needs in pain management for Canadian health care professionals: A cross sectional survey.

Continuing professional development needs in pain management for Canadian health care professionals: A cross sectional survey.

Continuing professional development needs in pain management for Canadian health care professionals: A cross sectional survey.

Continuing professional development needs in pain management for Canadian health care professionals: A cross sectional survey.

Background: Continuing professional development is an important means of improving access to effective patient care. Although pain content has increased significantly in prelicensure programs, little is known about how postlicensure health professionals advance or maintain competence in pain management.

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate Canadian health professionals' continuing professional development needs, activities, and preferred modalities for pain management.

Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional self-report web survey.

Results: The survey response rate was 57% (230/400). Respondents were primarily nurses (48%), university educated (95%), employed in academic hospital settings (62%), and had ≥11 years postlicensure experience (70%). Most patients (>50%) cared for in an average week presented with pain. Compared to those working in nonacademic settings, clinicians in academic settings reported significantly higher acute pain assessment competence (mean 7.8/10 versus 6.9/10; P < 0.002) and greater access to pain specialist consultants (73% versus 29%; P < 0.0001). Chronic pain assessment competence was not different between groups. Top learning needs included neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal pain, and chronic pain. Recently completed and preferred learning modalities respectively were informal and work-based: reading journal articles (56%, 54%), online independent learning (44%, 53%), and attending hospital rounds (43%, 42%); 17% had not completed any pain learning activities in the past 12 months. Respondents employed in nonacademic settings and nonphysicians were more likely to use pocket cards, mobile apps, and e-mail summaries to improve pain management.

Conclusions: Canadian postlicensure health professionals require greater access to and participation in interactive and multimodal methods of continuing professional development to facilitate competency in evidence-based pain management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信