生活的质量与数量:超越二分法。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ariel Dempsey, John Mulder
{"title":"生活的质量与数量:超越二分法。","authors":"Ariel Dempsey,&nbsp;John Mulder","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2022.0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A restrictive and dichotomous question has become the primary approach in many goals of care discussions. Is the primary goal of care <i>quantity</i> of life through aggressive therapy or <i>quality</i> of life through comfort care and hospice? Even though many health care providers recognize that quality vs quantity of life (QvQ) is a false dichotomy, in practice QvQ underlies many goals of care discussions and can negatively impact patient care. This article offers strategies for assessing patients at the end of life, presenting a first-line conversation process that can support a range of treatment options as well as a diversity of dynamic patient values. Based on decades of experience in palliative care and a review of relevant literature, we recommend four practical questions to serve as values \"vital signs,\" monitoring dynamic notions of quality of life and harmonizing patient values with treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892925/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Versus Quantity of Life: Beyond the Dichotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Ariel Dempsey,&nbsp;John Mulder\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pmr.2022.0058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A restrictive and dichotomous question has become the primary approach in many goals of care discussions. Is the primary goal of care <i>quantity</i> of life through aggressive therapy or <i>quality</i> of life through comfort care and hospice? Even though many health care providers recognize that quality vs quantity of life (QvQ) is a false dichotomy, in practice QvQ underlies many goals of care discussions and can negatively impact patient care. This article offers strategies for assessing patients at the end of life, presenting a first-line conversation process that can support a range of treatment options as well as a diversity of dynamic patient values. Based on decades of experience in palliative care and a review of relevant literature, we recommend four practical questions to serve as values \\\"vital signs,\\\" monitoring dynamic notions of quality of life and harmonizing patient values with treatment options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative medicine reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9892925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative medicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2022.0058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2022.0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一个限制性和二分性的问题已经成为许多护理目标讨论的主要方法。主要目标是通过积极治疗来提高生活质量还是通过舒适护理和安宁疗护来提高生活质量?尽管许多医疗保健提供者认识到生命质量与生命数量(QvQ)是一种错误的二分法,但在实践中,QvQ是许多护理讨论目标的基础,并可能对患者护理产生负面影响。这篇文章提供了评估临终病人的策略,提出了一个第一线的谈话过程,可以支持一系列的治疗方案,以及动态患者价值的多样性。基于数十年的姑息治疗经验和对相关文献的回顾,我们推荐四个实用问题作为“生命体征”的价值,监测生活质量的动态概念,并使患者的价值观与治疗方案相协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quality Versus Quantity of Life: Beyond the Dichotomy.

Quality Versus Quantity of Life: Beyond the Dichotomy.

A restrictive and dichotomous question has become the primary approach in many goals of care discussions. Is the primary goal of care quantity of life through aggressive therapy or quality of life through comfort care and hospice? Even though many health care providers recognize that quality vs quantity of life (QvQ) is a false dichotomy, in practice QvQ underlies many goals of care discussions and can negatively impact patient care. This article offers strategies for assessing patients at the end of life, presenting a first-line conversation process that can support a range of treatment options as well as a diversity of dynamic patient values. Based on decades of experience in palliative care and a review of relevant literature, we recommend four practical questions to serve as values "vital signs," monitoring dynamic notions of quality of life and harmonizing patient values with treatment options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信