早期退休储蓄的决定因素:新冠肺炎大流行的教训

IF 1.9 3区 经济学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Hazel Bateman , Loretti I. Dobrescu , Junhao Liu , Ben R. Newell , Susan Thorp
{"title":"早期退休储蓄的决定因素:新冠肺炎大流行的教训","authors":"Hazel Bateman ,&nbsp;Loretti I. Dobrescu ,&nbsp;Junhao Liu ,&nbsp;Ben R. Newell ,&nbsp;Susan Thorp","doi":"10.1016/j.jeoa.2023.100441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Australian regulations strictly limit early withdrawals from retirement plan accounts. However, in 2020, the Government made otherwise illiquid plan balances temporarily liquid, offering emergency relief during the pandemic. The COVID-19 Early Release Scheme allowed participants in financial hardship easy access to up to $A20,000 of savings over two rounds. We use administrative and survey data from a large retirement plan to describe how and why participants withdrew savings under the scheme. A majority report that they needed the money immediately but around one quarter said they anticipated future needs. Most thought about the decision for less than a week, acted soon after each round opened, and withdrew as much as they could. Many people did not estimate, or appear to have mis-estimated, the impact the withdrawal could have on their retirement savings. Our findings offer insights into preferences for liquidity. They also raise questions about whether the features of the early release scheme, and their implied endorsement by the Government, influenced some withdrawers more than personal deliberations over financial welfare.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Economics of Ageing","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834122/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of early-access to retirement savings: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Hazel Bateman ,&nbsp;Loretti I. Dobrescu ,&nbsp;Junhao Liu ,&nbsp;Ben R. Newell ,&nbsp;Susan Thorp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeoa.2023.100441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Australian regulations strictly limit early withdrawals from retirement plan accounts. However, in 2020, the Government made otherwise illiquid plan balances temporarily liquid, offering emergency relief during the pandemic. The COVID-19 Early Release Scheme allowed participants in financial hardship easy access to up to $A20,000 of savings over two rounds. We use administrative and survey data from a large retirement plan to describe how and why participants withdrew savings under the scheme. A majority report that they needed the money immediately but around one quarter said they anticipated future needs. Most thought about the decision for less than a week, acted soon after each round opened, and withdrew as much as they could. Many people did not estimate, or appear to have mis-estimated, the impact the withdrawal could have on their retirement savings. Our findings offer insights into preferences for liquidity. They also raise questions about whether the features of the early release scheme, and their implied endorsement by the Government, influenced some withdrawers more than personal deliberations over financial welfare.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Economics of Ageing\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9834122/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Economics of Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212828X23000014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Economics of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212828X23000014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

澳大利亚法规严格限制提前从退休计划账户提款。然而,在2020年,政府使非流动性计划余额暂时流动,在疫情期间提供紧急救济。新冠肺炎提前释放计划允许经济困难的参与者在两轮内轻松获得高达20万美元的储蓄。我们使用大型退休计划的行政和调查数据来描述参与者如何以及为什么提取该计划下的储蓄。大多数人报告说,他们立即需要这笔钱,但约四分之一的人表示,他们预计未来会有需求。大多数人考虑这个决定不到一周,在每一轮比赛开始后不久就采取了行动,并尽可能多地退出。许多人没有估计,或者似乎估计错误,提款可能对他们的退休储蓄产生的影响。我们的研究结果提供了对流动性偏好的见解。他们还提出了一个问题,即提前释放计划的特点,以及政府对其隐含的认可,是否比个人对经济福利的考虑更能影响一些扣缴义务人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determinants of early-access to retirement savings: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Determinants of early-access to retirement savings: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Determinants of early-access to retirement savings: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Determinants of early-access to retirement savings: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

Australian regulations strictly limit early withdrawals from retirement plan accounts. However, in 2020, the Government made otherwise illiquid plan balances temporarily liquid, offering emergency relief during the pandemic. The COVID-19 Early Release Scheme allowed participants in financial hardship easy access to up to $A20,000 of savings over two rounds. We use administrative and survey data from a large retirement plan to describe how and why participants withdrew savings under the scheme. A majority report that they needed the money immediately but around one quarter said they anticipated future needs. Most thought about the decision for less than a week, acted soon after each round opened, and withdrew as much as they could. Many people did not estimate, or appear to have mis-estimated, the impact the withdrawal could have on their retirement savings. Our findings offer insights into preferences for liquidity. They also raise questions about whether the features of the early release scheme, and their implied endorsement by the Government, influenced some withdrawers more than personal deliberations over financial welfare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Economics of Ageing (JEoA) is an international academic journal that publishes original theoretical and empirical research dealing with the interaction between demographic change and the economy. JEoA encompasses both microeconomic and macroeconomic perspectives and offers a platform for the discussion of topics including labour, health, and family economics, social security, income distribution, social mobility, immigration, productivity, structural change, economic growth and development. JEoA also solicits papers that have a policy focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信