对回应的回应

IF 2.1 2区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

British Journal of Politics & International Relations Pub Date : 2013-10-31 DOI:10.1111/1467-856X.12029

Peter Ferdinand

{"title":"对回应的回应","authors":"Peter Ferdinand","doi":"10.1111/1467-856X.12029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Restates the differences in focus between the original article and the Response, which justifies the choice of 1974 as the starting date for analysis.</li>\n \n <li>Accepts the more nuanced analysis of the voting convergence of the ASEAN states.</li>\n \n <li>Restates the considerations leading to the decision to include all the UNGA resolutions in the period chosen as the basis of the analysis, rather than a filtered selection.</li>\n \n <li>Argues that these two articles provide hypotheses for further qualitative as well as quantitative analysis of the factors determining the voting behaviour of Pacific Asian states.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"16 4","pages":"690-692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12029","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to a Response\",\"authors\":\"Peter Ferdinand\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-856X.12029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Restates the differences in focus between the original article and the Response, which justifies the choice of 1974 as the starting date for analysis.</li>\\n \\n <li>Accepts the more nuanced analysis of the voting convergence of the ASEAN states.</li>\\n \\n <li>Restates the considerations leading to the decision to include all the UNGA resolutions in the period chosen as the basis of the analysis, rather than a filtered selection.</li>\\n \\n <li>Argues that these two articles provide hypotheses for further qualitative as well as quantitative analysis of the factors determining the voting behaviour of Pacific Asian states.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Politics & International Relations\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"690-692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12029\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Politics & International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文重申了原文章和《回应》在重点上的不同，这证明选择1974年作为分析的开始日期是合理的。接受对东盟国家投票趋同的更细致的分析。重申导致决定将联大所有决议纳入所选时期作为分析基础的考虑因素，而不是经过筛选的选择。认为这两篇文章为进一步定性和定量分析决定太平洋亚洲国家投票行为的因素提供了假设。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Response to a Response

This article

Restates the differences in focus between the original article and the Response, which justifies the choice of 1974 as the starting date for analysis.
Accepts the more nuanced analysis of the voting convergence of the ASEAN states.
Restates the considerations leading to the decision to include all the UNGA resolutions in the period chosen as the basis of the analysis, rather than a filtered selection.
Argues that these two articles provide hypotheses for further qualitative as well as quantitative analysis of the factors determining the voting behaviour of Pacific Asian states.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

British Journal of Politics & International Relations Multiple-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.