双相情感障碍的认知障碍与轻度认知障碍和痴呆的比较:一项系统综述。

IF 2.1 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Mario Simjanoski, Aidan McIntyre, Flavio Kapczinski, Taiane de Azevedos Cardoso
{"title":"双相情感障碍的认知障碍与轻度认知障碍和痴呆的比较:一项系统综述。","authors":"Mario Simjanoski,&nbsp;Aidan McIntyre,&nbsp;Flavio Kapczinski,&nbsp;Taiane de Azevedos Cardoso","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review to describe cognitive abilities in bipolar disorder (BD) in comparison to cognitive abilities in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed with no year or language restrictions. The search yielded 1,461 articles, with 1,261 remaining after removal of duplicates, five of which were suitable for the systematic review: two for the comparison between BD and MCI and three comparing BD and dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses from our systematic review showed that euthymic individuals with BD present impairments in cognitive domains such as attention and executive functioning, motor skills, conceptual thinking, and visuo-spatial abilities that are equally severe as or more severe than the impairments observed in individuals with MCI. In contrast, studies comparing BD and dementia indicated that Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) both showed greater cognitive deficits than BD during euthymia, whereas BD during a mood episode demonstrated higher cognitive impairments than bvFTD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from our systematic review suggest that cognitive impairments in euthymic BD fall into a range between the impairments seen in MCI and those seen in dementia. More studies are needed to analyze these comparisons, while also focusing on comparing different clinical stages of BD with MCI and dementia to analyze the progression of the clinical course and cognitive dysfunction in BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039729/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder in comparison to mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Simjanoski,&nbsp;Aidan McIntyre,&nbsp;Flavio Kapczinski,&nbsp;Taiane de Azevedos Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review to describe cognitive abilities in bipolar disorder (BD) in comparison to cognitive abilities in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed with no year or language restrictions. The search yielded 1,461 articles, with 1,261 remaining after removal of duplicates, five of which were suitable for the systematic review: two for the comparison between BD and MCI and three comparing BD and dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses from our systematic review showed that euthymic individuals with BD present impairments in cognitive domains such as attention and executive functioning, motor skills, conceptual thinking, and visuo-spatial abilities that are equally severe as or more severe than the impairments observed in individuals with MCI. In contrast, studies comparing BD and dementia indicated that Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) both showed greater cognitive deficits than BD during euthymia, whereas BD during a mood episode demonstrated higher cognitive impairments than bvFTD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from our systematic review suggest that cognitive impairments in euthymic BD fall into a range between the impairments seen in MCI and those seen in dementia. More studies are needed to analyze these comparisons, while also focusing on comparing different clinical stages of BD with MCI and dementia to analyze the progression of the clinical course and cognitive dysfunction in BD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10039729/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:对双相情感障碍(BD)患者的认知能力与轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆患者的认知能力进行系统评价。方法:进行文献检索,无年份和语言限制。检索得到1461篇文章,删除重复后剩下1261篇,其中5篇适合系统评价:2篇用于BD和MCI的比较,3篇用于BD和痴呆的比较。结果:我们的系统综述分析显示,患有双相障碍的健康个体在认知领域(如注意力和执行功能、运动技能、概念思维和视觉空间能力)表现出与轻度认知障碍患者同样严重或更严重的损害。相比之下,比较双相障碍和痴呆的研究表明,阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆和行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)在精神状态时都比双相障碍表现出更大的认知缺陷,而在情绪发作时,双相障碍表现出比bvFTD更高的认知障碍。结论:我们的系统综述结果表明,心境双相障碍的认知损伤介于轻度认知障碍和痴呆之间。需要更多的研究来分析这些比较,同时也需要将不同临床阶段的BD与MCI和痴呆进行比较,分析BD的临床病程进展和认知功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder in comparison to mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review.

Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder in comparison to mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review to describe cognitive abilities in bipolar disorder (BD) in comparison to cognitive abilities in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia.

Methods: A literature search was performed with no year or language restrictions. The search yielded 1,461 articles, with 1,261 remaining after removal of duplicates, five of which were suitable for the systematic review: two for the comparison between BD and MCI and three comparing BD and dementia.

Results: Analyses from our systematic review showed that euthymic individuals with BD present impairments in cognitive domains such as attention and executive functioning, motor skills, conceptual thinking, and visuo-spatial abilities that are equally severe as or more severe than the impairments observed in individuals with MCI. In contrast, studies comparing BD and dementia indicated that Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) both showed greater cognitive deficits than BD during euthymia, whereas BD during a mood episode demonstrated higher cognitive impairments than bvFTD.

Conclusion: Findings from our systematic review suggest that cognitive impairments in euthymic BD fall into a range between the impairments seen in MCI and those seen in dementia. More studies are needed to analyze these comparisons, while also focusing on comparing different clinical stages of BD with MCI and dementia to analyze the progression of the clinical course and cognitive dysfunction in BD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信