在临床实践中使用自动胰岛素输送技术的共识建议。

IF 22 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Moshe Phillip, Revital Nimri, Richard M Bergenstal, Katharine Barnard-Kelly, Thomas Danne, Roman Hovorka, Boris P Kovatchev, Laurel H Messer, Christopher G Parkin, Louise Ambler-Osborn, Stephanie A Amiel, Lia Bally, Roy W Beck, Sarah Biester, Torben Biester, Julia E Blanchette, Emanuele Bosi, Charlotte K Boughton, Marc D Breton, Sue A Brown, Bruce A Buckingham, Albert Cai, Anders L Carlson, Jessica R Castle, Pratik Choudhary, Kelly L Close, Claudio Cobelli, Amy B Criego, Elizabeth Davis, Carine de Beaufort, Martin I de Bock, Daniel J DeSalvo, J Hans DeVries, Klemen Dovc, Francis J Doyle, Laya Ekhlaspour, Naama Fisch Shvalb, Gregory P Forlenza, Geraldine Gallen, Satish K Garg, Dana C Gershenoff, Linda A Gonder-Frederick, Ahmad Haidar, Sara Hartnell, Lutz Heinemann, Simon Heller, Irl B Hirsch, Korey K Hood, Diana Isaacs, David C Klonoff, Olga Kordonouri, Aaron Kowalski, Lori Laffel, Julia Lawton, Rayhan A Lal, Lalantha Leelarathna, David M Maahs, Helen R Murphy, Kirsten Nørgaard, David O'Neal, Sean Oser, Tamara Oser, Eric Renard, Michael C Riddell, David Rodbard, Steven J Russell, Desmond A Schatz, Viral N Shah, Jennifer L Sherr, Gregg D Simonson, R Paul Wadwa, Candice Ward, Stuart A Weinzimer, Emma G Wilmot, Tadej Battelino
{"title":"在临床实践中使用自动胰岛素输送技术的共识建议。","authors":"Moshe Phillip, Revital Nimri, Richard M Bergenstal, Katharine Barnard-Kelly, Thomas Danne, Roman Hovorka, Boris P Kovatchev, Laurel H Messer, Christopher G Parkin, Louise Ambler-Osborn, Stephanie A Amiel, Lia Bally, Roy W Beck, Sarah Biester, Torben Biester, Julia E Blanchette, Emanuele Bosi, Charlotte K Boughton, Marc D Breton, Sue A Brown, Bruce A Buckingham, Albert Cai, Anders L Carlson, Jessica R Castle, Pratik Choudhary, Kelly L Close, Claudio Cobelli, Amy B Criego, Elizabeth Davis, Carine de Beaufort, Martin I de Bock, Daniel J DeSalvo, J Hans DeVries, Klemen Dovc, Francis J Doyle, Laya Ekhlaspour, Naama Fisch Shvalb, Gregory P Forlenza, Geraldine Gallen, Satish K Garg, Dana C Gershenoff, Linda A Gonder-Frederick, Ahmad Haidar, Sara Hartnell, Lutz Heinemann, Simon Heller, Irl B Hirsch, Korey K Hood, Diana Isaacs, David C Klonoff, Olga Kordonouri, Aaron Kowalski, Lori Laffel, Julia Lawton, Rayhan A Lal, Lalantha Leelarathna, David M Maahs, Helen R Murphy, Kirsten Nørgaard, David O'Neal, Sean Oser, Tamara Oser, Eric Renard, Michael C Riddell, David Rodbard, Steven J Russell, Desmond A Schatz, Viral N Shah, Jennifer L Sherr, Gregg D Simonson, R Paul Wadwa, Candice Ward, Stuart A Weinzimer, Emma G Wilmot, Tadej Battelino","doi":"10.1210/endrev/bnac022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11544,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine reviews","volume":"44 2","pages":"254-280"},"PeriodicalIF":22.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Moshe Phillip, Revital Nimri, Richard M Bergenstal, Katharine Barnard-Kelly, Thomas Danne, Roman Hovorka, Boris P Kovatchev, Laurel H Messer, Christopher G Parkin, Louise Ambler-Osborn, Stephanie A Amiel, Lia Bally, Roy W Beck, Sarah Biester, Torben Biester, Julia E Blanchette, Emanuele Bosi, Charlotte K Boughton, Marc D Breton, Sue A Brown, Bruce A Buckingham, Albert Cai, Anders L Carlson, Jessica R Castle, Pratik Choudhary, Kelly L Close, Claudio Cobelli, Amy B Criego, Elizabeth Davis, Carine de Beaufort, Martin I de Bock, Daniel J DeSalvo, J Hans DeVries, Klemen Dovc, Francis J Doyle, Laya Ekhlaspour, Naama Fisch Shvalb, Gregory P Forlenza, Geraldine Gallen, Satish K Garg, Dana C Gershenoff, Linda A Gonder-Frederick, Ahmad Haidar, Sara Hartnell, Lutz Heinemann, Simon Heller, Irl B Hirsch, Korey K Hood, Diana Isaacs, David C Klonoff, Olga Kordonouri, Aaron Kowalski, Lori Laffel, Julia Lawton, Rayhan A Lal, Lalantha Leelarathna, David M Maahs, Helen R Murphy, Kirsten Nørgaard, David O'Neal, Sean Oser, Tamara Oser, Eric Renard, Michael C Riddell, David Rodbard, Steven J Russell, Desmond A Schatz, Viral N Shah, Jennifer L Sherr, Gregg D Simonson, R Paul Wadwa, Candice Ward, Stuart A Weinzimer, Emma G Wilmot, Tadej Battelino\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/endrev/bnac022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine reviews\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"254-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985411/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球糖尿病患病率的显著增长继续给糖尿病患者(PwD)、医疗保健提供者和支付者带来挑战。虽然维持接近正常的血糖水平已被证明可以预防或延缓糖尿病长期并发症的进展,但很大一部分PwD患者未能达到血糖目标。在过去的6年里,我们看到了胰岛素自动输送(AID)技术的巨大进步。大量随机对照试验和现实世界的研究表明,使用AID系统在帮助PwD实现长期血糖目标同时降低低血糖风险方面是安全有效的。因此,艾滋病援助系统最近已成为糖尿病管理的一个组成部分。然而,缺乏关于在临床环境中使用艾滋病援助系统的建议。这种指导性建议对国际开发署的成功和接受至关重要。所有治疗糖尿病的临床医生都需要熟悉现有的系统,以消除糖尿病护理质量的差异。这份报告为对利用艾滋病感兴趣的临床医生提供了急需的指导,并提供了一份全面的证据清单,列出了付款人在确定艾滋病保险覆盖资格标准时应考虑的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice.

Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice.

Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice.

Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice.

The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine reviews
Endocrine reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
42.00
自引率
1.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Endocrine Reviews, published bimonthly, features concise timely reviews updating key mechanistic and clinical concepts, alongside comprehensive, authoritative articles covering both experimental and clinical endocrinology themes. The journal considers topics informing clinical practice based on emerging and established evidence from clinical research. It also reviews advances in endocrine science stemming from studies in cell biology, immunology, pharmacology, genetics, molecular biology, neuroscience, reproductive medicine, and pediatric endocrinology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信