贷款与就业:来自银行流动性冲击的证据

Román Acosta , Josué Cortés
{"title":"贷款与就业:来自银行流动性冲击的证据","authors":"Román Acosta ,&nbsp;Josué Cortés","doi":"10.1016/j.latcb.2022.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the relationship between expansionary credit events and firms’ employment decisions. To overcome the endogeneity coming from the supply side of credit we exploited the legal and political framework in Mexico to examine the effects of local governments’ prepayment of loans, a situation that leads banks to channel newfound liquidity in firms. Analysis of a novel data set covering a 10-year period showed that a 1-standard-deviation increase in the issuance of new loans increases firms’ employment by 2.57 percentage points. Timing of the boost in employment varies, with smaller firms reacting immediately and larger firms reacting four months later. The effects are driven by firms in the manufacturing sector. Our results highlight the importance of the bank lending channel to stimulate employment in the short term, especially for smaller firms. Further, our estimates suggest that the effect of credit on employment could be amplified with policies that promote a more competitive corporate loan market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100867,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266614382200014X/pdfft?md5=4f6d8bbee3518f2efe777a8540c89bb5&pid=1-s2.0-S266614382200014X-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loans and employment: Evidence from bank-specific liquidity shocks\",\"authors\":\"Román Acosta ,&nbsp;Josué Cortés\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.latcb.2022.100059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates the relationship between expansionary credit events and firms’ employment decisions. To overcome the endogeneity coming from the supply side of credit we exploited the legal and political framework in Mexico to examine the effects of local governments’ prepayment of loans, a situation that leads banks to channel newfound liquidity in firms. Analysis of a novel data set covering a 10-year period showed that a 1-standard-deviation increase in the issuance of new loans increases firms’ employment by 2.57 percentage points. Timing of the boost in employment varies, with smaller firms reacting immediately and larger firms reacting four months later. The effects are driven by firms in the manufacturing sector. Our results highlight the importance of the bank lending channel to stimulate employment in the short term, especially for smaller firms. Further, our estimates suggest that the effect of credit on employment could be amplified with policies that promote a more competitive corporate loan market.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Central Banking\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266614382200014X/pdfft?md5=4f6d8bbee3518f2efe777a8540c89bb5&pid=1-s2.0-S266614382200014X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Central Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266614382200014X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Central Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266614382200014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了扩张性信贷事件与企业雇佣决策之间的关系。为了克服信贷供给侧的内生性,我们利用墨西哥的法律和政治框架来研究地方政府提前偿还贷款的影响,这种情况导致银行向公司输送新获得的流动性。对涵盖10年期间的新数据集的分析表明,新贷款发行每增加1个标准差,企业的就业就会增加2.57个百分点。就业增加的时机各不相同,小公司会立即做出反应,大公司会在四个月后做出反应。这种影响是由制造业企业推动的。我们的研究结果强调了银行贷款渠道在短期内刺激就业的重要性,尤其是对小型企业而言。此外,我们的估计表明,促进更具竞争力的企业贷款市场的政策可能会扩大信贷对就业的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loans and employment: Evidence from bank-specific liquidity shocks

This paper investigates the relationship between expansionary credit events and firms’ employment decisions. To overcome the endogeneity coming from the supply side of credit we exploited the legal and political framework in Mexico to examine the effects of local governments’ prepayment of loans, a situation that leads banks to channel newfound liquidity in firms. Analysis of a novel data set covering a 10-year period showed that a 1-standard-deviation increase in the issuance of new loans increases firms’ employment by 2.57 percentage points. Timing of the boost in employment varies, with smaller firms reacting immediately and larger firms reacting four months later. The effects are driven by firms in the manufacturing sector. Our results highlight the importance of the bank lending channel to stimulate employment in the short term, especially for smaller firms. Further, our estimates suggest that the effect of credit on employment could be amplified with policies that promote a more competitive corporate loan market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信