基于细胞的体外药物分子渗透性评价技术的研究进展及考虑

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rajat Garg, Anuj Garg
{"title":"基于细胞的体外药物分子渗透性评价技术的研究进展及考虑","authors":"Rajat Garg,&nbsp;Anuj Garg","doi":"10.2174/1567201819666220411115108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main focus of this article is to analyze numerous in-vitro methods and their modifications currently used to assess the absorption or permeability of drug molecules from different formulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the literature, no single method can be applied as a gold standard for measuring the exact permeability of each drug molecule. Various in-vitro methods, including tissue and cell-based models, are reported to assess the absorption of drugs. Caco2 cell is a widely used model for absorption studies but sometimes provides inaccurate results. Alternative methods like Madin-Darby canine kidney, IEC- 18, TC-7, 2/4/A1, and IPEC-J2 cell lines are also used. In this study, the merits and demerits of each method have been described, along with the factors affecting the results of absorption studies. The selection of an appropriate method is critical in accurately assessing the permeability and absorption of drugs by mechanisms like vesicular and active transport. This review article aims to provide in-depth knowledge regarding the different in-vitro methods, strategies, and selection of appropriate in-vitro models to predict intestinal absorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A flow chart diagram for decision-making in selecting an appropriate in-vitro permeability model for formulation has been proposed for estimating permeability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10842,"journal":{"name":"Current drug delivery","volume":"20 5","pages":"526-544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advances and Considerations for the Selection of Cell-based <i>In-vitro</i> Techniques for the Assessment of Permeability of Drug Molecules.\",\"authors\":\"Rajat Garg,&nbsp;Anuj Garg\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1567201819666220411115108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main focus of this article is to analyze numerous in-vitro methods and their modifications currently used to assess the absorption or permeability of drug molecules from different formulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the literature, no single method can be applied as a gold standard for measuring the exact permeability of each drug molecule. Various in-vitro methods, including tissue and cell-based models, are reported to assess the absorption of drugs. Caco2 cell is a widely used model for absorption studies but sometimes provides inaccurate results. Alternative methods like Madin-Darby canine kidney, IEC- 18, TC-7, 2/4/A1, and IPEC-J2 cell lines are also used. In this study, the merits and demerits of each method have been described, along with the factors affecting the results of absorption studies. The selection of an appropriate method is critical in accurately assessing the permeability and absorption of drugs by mechanisms like vesicular and active transport. This review article aims to provide in-depth knowledge regarding the different in-vitro methods, strategies, and selection of appropriate in-vitro models to predict intestinal absorption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A flow chart diagram for decision-making in selecting an appropriate in-vitro permeability model for formulation has been proposed for estimating permeability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current drug delivery\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"526-544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current drug delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1567201819666220411115108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1567201819666220411115108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本文的主要重点是分析目前用于评估不同配方药物分子的吸收或渗透的许多体外方法及其改进。方法:在文献中,没有一种方法可以作为测量每种药物分子的确切通透性的金标准。各种体外方法,包括组织和细胞为基础的模型,据报道,以评估药物的吸收。cco2细胞是一种广泛应用于吸收研究的模型,但有时会提供不准确的结果。其他方法如Madin-Darby犬肾、IEC- 18、TC-7、2/4/A1和IPEC-J2细胞系也被使用。在本研究中,描述了每种方法的优缺点,以及影响吸收研究结果的因素。选择合适的方法对于准确评估药物通过囊泡和主动转运等机制的渗透性和吸收至关重要。这篇综述文章旨在深入了解不同的体外方法、策略,以及选择合适的体外模型来预测肠道吸收。结论:本文提出了一种用于估算渗透率的决策流程图,用于选择合适的体外渗透率模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advances and Considerations for the Selection of Cell-based In-vitro Techniques for the Assessment of Permeability of Drug Molecules.

Objective: The main focus of this article is to analyze numerous in-vitro methods and their modifications currently used to assess the absorption or permeability of drug molecules from different formulations.

Methods: In the literature, no single method can be applied as a gold standard for measuring the exact permeability of each drug molecule. Various in-vitro methods, including tissue and cell-based models, are reported to assess the absorption of drugs. Caco2 cell is a widely used model for absorption studies but sometimes provides inaccurate results. Alternative methods like Madin-Darby canine kidney, IEC- 18, TC-7, 2/4/A1, and IPEC-J2 cell lines are also used. In this study, the merits and demerits of each method have been described, along with the factors affecting the results of absorption studies. The selection of an appropriate method is critical in accurately assessing the permeability and absorption of drugs by mechanisms like vesicular and active transport. This review article aims to provide in-depth knowledge regarding the different in-vitro methods, strategies, and selection of appropriate in-vitro models to predict intestinal absorption.

Conclusion: A flow chart diagram for decision-making in selecting an appropriate in-vitro permeability model for formulation has been proposed for estimating permeability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current drug delivery
Current drug delivery PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Current Drug Delivery aims to publish peer-reviewed articles, research articles, short and in-depth reviews, and drug clinical trials studies in the rapidly developing field of drug delivery. Modern drug research aims to build delivery properties of a drug at the design phase, however in many cases this idea cannot be met and the development of delivery systems becomes as important as the development of the drugs themselves. The journal aims to cover the latest outstanding developments in drug and vaccine delivery employing physical, physico-chemical and chemical methods. The drugs include a wide range of bioactive compounds from simple pharmaceuticals to peptides, proteins, nucleotides, nucleosides and sugars. The journal will also report progress in the fields of transport routes and mechanisms including efflux proteins and multi-drug resistance. The journal is essential for all pharmaceutical scientists involved in drug design, development and delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信