研究水平对老年人偶发性记忆表现的影响:元记忆的中介作用

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
L. Guerrero-Sastoque , B. Bouazzaoui , L. Burger , L. Taconnat
{"title":"研究水平对老年人偶发性记忆表现的影响:元记忆的中介作用","authors":"L. Guerrero-Sastoque ,&nbsp;B. Bouazzaoui ,&nbsp;L. Burger ,&nbsp;L. Taconnat","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2017.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Educational level is a factor of cognitive reserve and older adults with a higher level of formal education have a better memory performance than those having a lower educational level (Angel et al., 2010; Van Der Elst, Van Boxtel, Van Breukelen, &amp; Jolles, 2005). Memory functioning can also be modulated by the beliefs and knowledge of a person about his/her own memory, that is, by his/her metamemory (Hultsch, Hertzog, &amp; Dixon, 1987). The objective of this study was to examine the role of metamemory as a potential mediator of the effect of educational level on memory performance. Eighty-three older adults (60–80 years) participated in the experiment, they have been divided into two subgroups according to their educational level (high: 14.36 years and low level: 9.85 years). Episodic memory was evaluated with a cued recall task and metamemory by the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA). As shown by previous studies, results indicated that educational level had a significant effect on memory and metamemory, higher educational level was associated to better memory and metamemory capacities. At the MIA questionnaire, older adults with a high educational level affirmed using more internal and external strategies for learning, having higher motivation and perceiving less memory change with aging than older adults with a lower educational level. They also showed that the metamemory dimensions associated to the memory performance differed according to the educational level. For participants with a lower educational level, memory performance was correlated to the participants’ perception about their memory capacity and their knowledge about memory tasks, while for participants with a higher educational level, memory performance was correlated to the dimensions linked to memory control (strategies and motivation). Finally, the group effect was mediated by metamemory, specifically by the use of internal strategies. These results suggest that a prolonged educative experience would be associated to a better capacity to implement adapted strategies, which led individuals to maintain an optimal memory performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"66 2","pages":"Pages 111-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psfr.2017.05.002","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effet du niveau d’études sur les performances en mémoire épisodique chez des adultes âgés : rôle médiateur de la métamémoire\",\"authors\":\"L. Guerrero-Sastoque ,&nbsp;B. Bouazzaoui ,&nbsp;L. Burger ,&nbsp;L. Taconnat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psfr.2017.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Educational level is a factor of cognitive reserve and older adults with a higher level of formal education have a better memory performance than those having a lower educational level (Angel et al., 2010; Van Der Elst, Van Boxtel, Van Breukelen, &amp; Jolles, 2005). Memory functioning can also be modulated by the beliefs and knowledge of a person about his/her own memory, that is, by his/her metamemory (Hultsch, Hertzog, &amp; Dixon, 1987). The objective of this study was to examine the role of metamemory as a potential mediator of the effect of educational level on memory performance. Eighty-three older adults (60–80 years) participated in the experiment, they have been divided into two subgroups according to their educational level (high: 14.36 years and low level: 9.85 years). Episodic memory was evaluated with a cued recall task and metamemory by the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA). As shown by previous studies, results indicated that educational level had a significant effect on memory and metamemory, higher educational level was associated to better memory and metamemory capacities. At the MIA questionnaire, older adults with a high educational level affirmed using more internal and external strategies for learning, having higher motivation and perceiving less memory change with aging than older adults with a lower educational level. They also showed that the metamemory dimensions associated to the memory performance differed according to the educational level. For participants with a lower educational level, memory performance was correlated to the participants’ perception about their memory capacity and their knowledge about memory tasks, while for participants with a higher educational level, memory performance was correlated to the dimensions linked to memory control (strategies and motivation). Finally, the group effect was mediated by metamemory, specifically by the use of internal strategies. These results suggest that a prolonged educative experience would be associated to a better capacity to implement adapted strategies, which led individuals to maintain an optimal memory performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychologie Francaise\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 111-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psfr.2017.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychologie Francaise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298417300237\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298417300237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

受教育程度是认知储备的一个因素,受教育程度较高的老年人的记忆表现优于受教育程度较低的老年人(Angel et al., 2010;范·德·埃尔斯特、范·博克斯特尔、范·布鲁克伦等人;Jolles, 2005)。记忆功能也可以通过一个人对自己记忆的信念和认识来调节,也就是说,通过他/她的元记忆来调节(Hultsch, Hertzog, &迪克森,1987)。本研究的目的是探讨元记忆作为教育水平对记忆表现影响的潜在中介的作用。83名老年人(60-80岁)参加了实验,根据他们的受教育程度分为两组(高14.36岁,低9.85岁)。情景记忆采用线索回忆任务和元记忆量表(MIA)进行评估。以往的研究结果表明,受教育程度对记忆和元记忆有显著影响,受教育程度越高,记忆和元记忆能力越强。在MIA问卷中,高教育水平的老年人比低教育水平的老年人使用更多的内部和外部学习策略,有更高的动机和更少的记忆随年龄变化。他们还表明,与记忆表现相关的元记忆维度因教育水平的不同而不同。对于受教育程度较低的被试,记忆表现与被试对自己记忆容量的认知和对记忆任务的了解相关;而对于受教育程度较高的被试,记忆表现与记忆控制相关的维度(策略和动机)相关。最后,群体效应是由元记忆介导的,特别是内部策略的使用。这些结果表明,长时间的教育经历与更好的实施适应策略的能力有关,这使得个人保持最佳的记忆表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effet du niveau d’études sur les performances en mémoire épisodique chez des adultes âgés : rôle médiateur de la métamémoire

Educational level is a factor of cognitive reserve and older adults with a higher level of formal education have a better memory performance than those having a lower educational level (Angel et al., 2010; Van Der Elst, Van Boxtel, Van Breukelen, & Jolles, 2005). Memory functioning can also be modulated by the beliefs and knowledge of a person about his/her own memory, that is, by his/her metamemory (Hultsch, Hertzog, & Dixon, 1987). The objective of this study was to examine the role of metamemory as a potential mediator of the effect of educational level on memory performance. Eighty-three older adults (60–80 years) participated in the experiment, they have been divided into two subgroups according to their educational level (high: 14.36 years and low level: 9.85 years). Episodic memory was evaluated with a cued recall task and metamemory by the Metamemory in Adulthood questionnaire (MIA). As shown by previous studies, results indicated that educational level had a significant effect on memory and metamemory, higher educational level was associated to better memory and metamemory capacities. At the MIA questionnaire, older adults with a high educational level affirmed using more internal and external strategies for learning, having higher motivation and perceiving less memory change with aging than older adults with a lower educational level. They also showed that the metamemory dimensions associated to the memory performance differed according to the educational level. For participants with a lower educational level, memory performance was correlated to the participants’ perception about their memory capacity and their knowledge about memory tasks, while for participants with a higher educational level, memory performance was correlated to the dimensions linked to memory control (strategies and motivation). Finally, the group effect was mediated by metamemory, specifically by the use of internal strategies. These results suggest that a prolonged educative experience would be associated to a better capacity to implement adapted strategies, which led individuals to maintain an optimal memory performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信