脊髓损伤患者治疗方案中潜在的有害药物相互作用。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2023.2185399
Shikha Gupta, Alaina Dhawan, Jillian Dhawan, Mary Ann McColl, Karen M Smith, Alexander McColl
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者治疗方案中潜在的有害药物相互作用。","authors":"Shikha Gupta, Alaina Dhawan, Jillian Dhawan, Mary Ann McColl, Karen M Smith, Alexander McColl","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2185399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals with spinal cord injury deal with multiple health complications that require them to use many medications. The purpose of this paper was to find the most common potentially harmful drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury, and the risk factors associated with it. We further highlight the relevance of each of the DDIs specific to spinal cord injury population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational design and cross-sectional analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community; Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals with spinal cord injury (<i>n</i> = 108).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures/analysis: </strong>The main outcome was the presence of one or more potential DDIs that can lead to an adverse outcome. All the reported drugs were classified as per the World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification system. Twenty potential DDIs were selected for the analysis based on the most common medications prescribed to people with spinal cord injury and severity of clinical consequences. The medication lists of study participants were analyzed for selected DDIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 20 potential DDIs analyzed in our sample, the top 3 prevalent DDIs were Opioids + Skeletal Muscle Relaxants, Opioids + Gabapentinoids, and Benzodiazepines + ≥ 2 other central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs. Of the total sample of 108 respondents, 31 participants (29%) were identified with having at least one potential DDI. The risk of having a potential DDI was highly associated with polypharmacy, though no associations were found between the presence of a drug interaction and age, sex, level of injury, time since injury, or cause of injury among the study sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost three out of ten individuals with spinal cord injury were at risk of having a potentially harmful drug interaction. Clinical and communication tools are needed that facilitate identification and elimination of harmful drug combinations in the therapeutic regimens of patients with spinal cord injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"692-700"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potentially harmful drug-drug interactions in the therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Shikha Gupta, Alaina Dhawan, Jillian Dhawan, Mary Ann McColl, Karen M Smith, Alexander McColl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2023.2185399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals with spinal cord injury deal with multiple health complications that require them to use many medications. The purpose of this paper was to find the most common potentially harmful drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury, and the risk factors associated with it. We further highlight the relevance of each of the DDIs specific to spinal cord injury population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational design and cross-sectional analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community; Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals with spinal cord injury (<i>n</i> = 108).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures/analysis: </strong>The main outcome was the presence of one or more potential DDIs that can lead to an adverse outcome. All the reported drugs were classified as per the World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification system. Twenty potential DDIs were selected for the analysis based on the most common medications prescribed to people with spinal cord injury and severity of clinical consequences. The medication lists of study participants were analyzed for selected DDIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 20 potential DDIs analyzed in our sample, the top 3 prevalent DDIs were Opioids + Skeletal Muscle Relaxants, Opioids + Gabapentinoids, and Benzodiazepines + ≥ 2 other central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs. Of the total sample of 108 respondents, 31 participants (29%) were identified with having at least one potential DDI. The risk of having a potential DDI was highly associated with polypharmacy, though no associations were found between the presence of a drug interaction and age, sex, level of injury, time since injury, or cause of injury among the study sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost three out of ten individuals with spinal cord injury were at risk of having a potentially harmful drug interaction. Clinical and communication tools are needed that facilitate identification and elimination of harmful drug combinations in the therapeutic regimens of patients with spinal cord injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"692-700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2185399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2185399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:脊髓损伤患者面临多种健康并发症,需要使用多种药物。本文旨在找出脊髓损伤患者治疗方案中最常见的潜在有害药物相互作用(DDIs)及其相关风险因素。我们进一步强调了每种DDIs与脊髓损伤人群的特殊相关性:设计:观察性设计和横断面分析:地点:加拿大社区:主要结果测量/分析:主要结果是存在一种或多种可能导致不良后果的潜在DDIs。所有报告的药物均按照世界卫生组织的解剖治疗化学分类系统进行了分类。根据脊髓损伤患者最常服用的药物和临床后果的严重程度,筛选出 20 种潜在的 DDIs 进行分析。对研究参与者的用药清单进行了分析,以确定所选的 DDIs:在样本中分析的 20 种潜在 DDIs 中,前 3 种最常见的 DDIs 是阿片类药物 + 骨骼肌松弛剂、阿片类药物 + 加巴喷丁类药物,以及苯二氮卓类药物 + ≥ 2 种其他中枢神经系统(CNS)活性药物。在 108 位受访者中,有 31 位受访者(29%)被确认至少有一种潜在的 DDI。尽管在研究样本中未发现药物相互作用与年龄、性别、受伤程度、受伤后时间或受伤原因之间存在关联,但潜在DDI的风险与多药治疗高度相关:结论:每十名脊髓损伤患者中就有近三人面临潜在有害药物相互作用的风险。我们需要临床和交流工具来帮助脊髓损伤患者识别和消除治疗方案中的有害药物组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potentially harmful drug-drug interactions in the therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury.

Objectives: Individuals with spinal cord injury deal with multiple health complications that require them to use many medications. The purpose of this paper was to find the most common potentially harmful drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury, and the risk factors associated with it. We further highlight the relevance of each of the DDIs specific to spinal cord injury population.

Design: Observational design and cross-sectional analysis.

Setting: Community; Canada.

Participants: Individuals with spinal cord injury (n = 108).

Main outcome measures/analysis: The main outcome was the presence of one or more potential DDIs that can lead to an adverse outcome. All the reported drugs were classified as per the World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification system. Twenty potential DDIs were selected for the analysis based on the most common medications prescribed to people with spinal cord injury and severity of clinical consequences. The medication lists of study participants were analyzed for selected DDIs.

Results: Among the 20 potential DDIs analyzed in our sample, the top 3 prevalent DDIs were Opioids + Skeletal Muscle Relaxants, Opioids + Gabapentinoids, and Benzodiazepines + ≥ 2 other central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs. Of the total sample of 108 respondents, 31 participants (29%) were identified with having at least one potential DDI. The risk of having a potential DDI was highly associated with polypharmacy, though no associations were found between the presence of a drug interaction and age, sex, level of injury, time since injury, or cause of injury among the study sample.

Conclusion: Almost three out of ten individuals with spinal cord injury were at risk of having a potentially harmful drug interaction. Clinical and communication tools are needed that facilitate identification and elimination of harmful drug combinations in the therapeutic regimens of patients with spinal cord injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信