ELN iMDS血流工作组对骨髓增生异常综合征的流式细胞术异常诊断潜力的多中心前瞻性评估

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Wolfgang Kern, Theresia M. Westers, Frauke Bellos, Marie Christine Bene, Peter Bettelheim, Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen, Kate Burbury, Sung-Chao Chu, Matthew Cullen, Matteo Della Porta, Alan Stewart Dunlop, Ulrika Johansson, Sergio Matarraz, Uta Oelschlaegel, Kiyoyuki Ogata, Anna Porwit, Frank Preijers, Katherina Psarra, Leonie Saft, Dolores Subirá, Elisabeth Weiß, Vincent H. J. van der Velden, Arjan van de Loosdrecht
{"title":"ELN iMDS血流工作组对骨髓增生异常综合征的流式细胞术异常诊断潜力的多中心前瞻性评估","authors":"Wolfgang Kern,&nbsp;Theresia M. Westers,&nbsp;Frauke Bellos,&nbsp;Marie Christine Bene,&nbsp;Peter Bettelheim,&nbsp;Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen,&nbsp;Kate Burbury,&nbsp;Sung-Chao Chu,&nbsp;Matthew Cullen,&nbsp;Matteo Della Porta,&nbsp;Alan Stewart Dunlop,&nbsp;Ulrika Johansson,&nbsp;Sergio Matarraz,&nbsp;Uta Oelschlaegel,&nbsp;Kiyoyuki Ogata,&nbsp;Anna Porwit,&nbsp;Frank Preijers,&nbsp;Katherina Psarra,&nbsp;Leonie Saft,&nbsp;Dolores Subirá,&nbsp;Elisabeth Weiß,&nbsp;Vincent H. J. van der Velden,&nbsp;Arjan van de Loosdrecht","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a diagnostic challenge. This prospective multicenter study was conducted to evaluate pre-defined flow cytometric markers in the diagnostic work-up of MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thousand six hundred and eighty-two patients with suspected MDS/CMML were analyzed by both cytomorphology according to WHO 2016 criteria and flow cytometry according to ELN recommendations. Flow cytometric readout was categorized ‘non-MDS’ (i.e. no signs of MDS/CMML and limited signs of MDS/CMML) and ‘in agreement with MDS’ (i.e., in agreement with MDS/CMML).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Flow cytometric readout categorized 60% of patients in agreement with MDS, 28% showed limited signs of MDS and 12% had no signs of MDS. In 81% of cases flow cytometric readouts and cytomorphologic diagnosis correlated. For high-risk MDS, the level of concordance was 92%.</p>\n \n <p>A total of 17 immunophenotypic aberrancies were found independently related to MDS/CMML in ≥1 of the subgroups of low-risk MDS, high-risk MDS, CMML. A cut-off of ≥3 of these aberrancies resulted in 80% agreement with cytomorphology (20% cases concordantly negative, 60% positive). Moreover, &gt;3% myeloid progenitor cells were significantly associated with MDS (286/293 such cases, 98%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Data from this prospective multicenter study led to recognition of 17 immunophenotypic markers allowing to identify cases ‘in agreement with MDS’. Moreover, data emphasizes the clinical utility of immunophenotyping in MDS diagnostics, given the high concordance between cytomorphology and the flow cytometric readout. Results from the current study challenge the application of the cytomorphologically defined cut-off of 5% blasts for flow cytometry and rather suggest a 3% cut-off for the latter.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter prospective evaluation of diagnostic potential of flow cytometric aberrancies in myelodysplastic syndromes by the ELN iMDS flow working group\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Kern,&nbsp;Theresia M. Westers,&nbsp;Frauke Bellos,&nbsp;Marie Christine Bene,&nbsp;Peter Bettelheim,&nbsp;Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen,&nbsp;Kate Burbury,&nbsp;Sung-Chao Chu,&nbsp;Matthew Cullen,&nbsp;Matteo Della Porta,&nbsp;Alan Stewart Dunlop,&nbsp;Ulrika Johansson,&nbsp;Sergio Matarraz,&nbsp;Uta Oelschlaegel,&nbsp;Kiyoyuki Ogata,&nbsp;Anna Porwit,&nbsp;Frank Preijers,&nbsp;Katherina Psarra,&nbsp;Leonie Saft,&nbsp;Dolores Subirá,&nbsp;Elisabeth Weiß,&nbsp;Vincent H. J. van der Velden,&nbsp;Arjan van de Loosdrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cyto.b.22105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a diagnostic challenge. This prospective multicenter study was conducted to evaluate pre-defined flow cytometric markers in the diagnostic work-up of MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thousand six hundred and eighty-two patients with suspected MDS/CMML were analyzed by both cytomorphology according to WHO 2016 criteria and flow cytometry according to ELN recommendations. Flow cytometric readout was categorized ‘non-MDS’ (i.e. no signs of MDS/CMML and limited signs of MDS/CMML) and ‘in agreement with MDS’ (i.e., in agreement with MDS/CMML).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Flow cytometric readout categorized 60% of patients in agreement with MDS, 28% showed limited signs of MDS and 12% had no signs of MDS. In 81% of cases flow cytometric readouts and cytomorphologic diagnosis correlated. For high-risk MDS, the level of concordance was 92%.</p>\\n \\n <p>A total of 17 immunophenotypic aberrancies were found independently related to MDS/CMML in ≥1 of the subgroups of low-risk MDS, high-risk MDS, CMML. A cut-off of ≥3 of these aberrancies resulted in 80% agreement with cytomorphology (20% cases concordantly negative, 60% positive). Moreover, &gt;3% myeloid progenitor cells were significantly associated with MDS (286/293 such cases, 98%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from this prospective multicenter study led to recognition of 17 immunophenotypic markers allowing to identify cases ‘in agreement with MDS’. Moreover, data emphasizes the clinical utility of immunophenotyping in MDS diagnostics, given the high concordance between cytomorphology and the flow cytometric readout. Results from the current study challenge the application of the cytomorphologically defined cut-off of 5% blasts for flow cytometry and rather suggest a 3% cut-off for the latter.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.22105\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.22105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)是一个诊断挑战。这项前瞻性多中心研究旨在评估预定义的流式细胞术标志物在MDS和慢性髓细胞白血病(CMML)的诊断检查中的作用。方法根据WHO 2016标准对疑似MDS/CMML患者进行细胞形态学检查和ELN推荐的流式细胞术分析。流式细胞术读数被分类为“非MDS”(即没有MDS/CMML迹象和有限的MDS/CMML迹象)和“与MDS一致”(即与MDS/CMML一致)。结果流式细胞术显示60%的患者符合MDS, 28%的患者表现出有限的MDS症状,12%的患者没有MDS症状。在81%的病例中,流式细胞术读数与细胞形态学诊断相关。对于高危MDS,一致性水平为92%。在低危MDS、高危MDS、CMML的≥1个亚组中,共发现17个免疫表型异常与MDS/CMML独立相关。这些异常≥3个的临界值导致80%与细胞形态学一致(20%一致阴性,60%一致阳性)。此外,3%髓系祖细胞与MDS显著相关(286/293例,98%)。结论:这项前瞻性多中心研究的数据识别出17种免疫表型标记物,从而识别出“与MDS一致”的病例。此外,鉴于细胞形态学和流式细胞术读数之间的高度一致性,数据强调了免疫表型在MDS诊断中的临床应用。当前研究的结果挑战了流式细胞术中细胞形态学定义的5%的临界值的应用,而建议后者的临界值为3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter prospective evaluation of diagnostic potential of flow cytometric aberrancies in myelodysplastic syndromes by the ELN iMDS flow working group

Background

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a diagnostic challenge. This prospective multicenter study was conducted to evaluate pre-defined flow cytometric markers in the diagnostic work-up of MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).

Methods

Thousand six hundred and eighty-two patients with suspected MDS/CMML were analyzed by both cytomorphology according to WHO 2016 criteria and flow cytometry according to ELN recommendations. Flow cytometric readout was categorized ‘non-MDS’ (i.e. no signs of MDS/CMML and limited signs of MDS/CMML) and ‘in agreement with MDS’ (i.e., in agreement with MDS/CMML).

Results

Flow cytometric readout categorized 60% of patients in agreement with MDS, 28% showed limited signs of MDS and 12% had no signs of MDS. In 81% of cases flow cytometric readouts and cytomorphologic diagnosis correlated. For high-risk MDS, the level of concordance was 92%.

A total of 17 immunophenotypic aberrancies were found independently related to MDS/CMML in ≥1 of the subgroups of low-risk MDS, high-risk MDS, CMML. A cut-off of ≥3 of these aberrancies resulted in 80% agreement with cytomorphology (20% cases concordantly negative, 60% positive). Moreover, >3% myeloid progenitor cells were significantly associated with MDS (286/293 such cases, 98%).

Conclusion

Data from this prospective multicenter study led to recognition of 17 immunophenotypic markers allowing to identify cases ‘in agreement with MDS’. Moreover, data emphasizes the clinical utility of immunophenotyping in MDS diagnostics, given the high concordance between cytomorphology and the flow cytometric readout. Results from the current study challenge the application of the cytomorphologically defined cut-off of 5% blasts for flow cytometry and rather suggest a 3% cut-off for the latter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry features original research reports, in-depth reviews and special issues that directly relate to and palpably impact clinical flow, mass and image-based cytometry. These may include clinical and translational investigations important in the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic management of patients. Thus, we welcome research papers from various disciplines related [but not limited to] hematopathologists, hematologists, immunologists and cell biologists with clinically relevant and innovative studies investigating individual-cell analytics and/or separations. In addition to the types of papers indicated above, we also welcome Letters to the Editor, describing case reports or important medical or technical topics relevant to our readership without the length and depth of a full original report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信