一种使用激光血流计的新型血管通路管理方法的实用性。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiorenal Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-23 DOI:10.1159/000528897
Moe Kojima, Naoya Tanabe, Yu Kojima, Koichi Tamura, Hiroo Takahashi, Jun Ito
{"title":"一种使用激光血流计的新型血管通路管理方法的实用性。","authors":"Moe Kojima, Naoya Tanabe, Yu Kojima, Koichi Tamura, Hiroo Takahashi, Jun Ito","doi":"10.1159/000528897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Various methods for vascular access (VA) management have been studied. We investigated the usefulness of a new, simple, and quantitative VA management method using the Pocket LDF® laser blood flowmeter (hereinafter \"LDF\") that noninvasively measures peripheral circulation flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peripheral circulation flow was measured in 82 patients (43 men) on maintenance hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The shunt symmetry index (SSI) was calculated as peripheral circulation flow in the AVF limb divided by that in the non-AVF limb. SSI was used for microcirculation evaluation and also compared by AVF site. Patients undergoing vascular access interventional therapy (VAIVT) underwent ultrasound evaluation (Doppler ultrasonography) of the AVF and SSI measurement before and after VAIVT. SSI was compared between those who did and did not require VAIVT, and the cutoff value for SSI was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As many as 86% of the patients who were measured peripheral circulation flow had SSI &lt;1.0, which indicates that AVF reduced peripheral circulation flow. All patients who underwent VAIVT showed a decrease in SSI to &lt;1.0 after VAIVT, probably due to improvement of stenosis. SSI differed significantly between patients who did and did not require VAIVT (1.20 ± 0.49 vs. 0.65 ± 0.33, p &lt; 0.001), which indicates that SSI is affected by the presence of stenosis in the proximal vein of the VA anastomosis. In patients with SSI ≥1.0, stenosis of the proximal vein of the AVF caused stasis of blood flow, resulting in increased peripheral blood flow. AVF site seems to have no impact on peripheral circulation flow. The SSI cutoff value for the screening of proximal vein stenosis was 1.06 (sensitivity: 0.69, specificity: 0.93, area under the curve: 0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the ROC analysis, we recommend considering AVF ultrasound for SSI &gt;1.06. Our results suggest the usefulness of the described VA management method using the LDF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9584,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorenal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"232-237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of a Novel Vascular Access Management Method Using a Laser Blood Flowmeter.\",\"authors\":\"Moe Kojima, Naoya Tanabe, Yu Kojima, Koichi Tamura, Hiroo Takahashi, Jun Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000528897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Various methods for vascular access (VA) management have been studied. We investigated the usefulness of a new, simple, and quantitative VA management method using the Pocket LDF® laser blood flowmeter (hereinafter \\\"LDF\\\") that noninvasively measures peripheral circulation flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peripheral circulation flow was measured in 82 patients (43 men) on maintenance hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The shunt symmetry index (SSI) was calculated as peripheral circulation flow in the AVF limb divided by that in the non-AVF limb. SSI was used for microcirculation evaluation and also compared by AVF site. Patients undergoing vascular access interventional therapy (VAIVT) underwent ultrasound evaluation (Doppler ultrasonography) of the AVF and SSI measurement before and after VAIVT. SSI was compared between those who did and did not require VAIVT, and the cutoff value for SSI was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As many as 86% of the patients who were measured peripheral circulation flow had SSI &lt;1.0, which indicates that AVF reduced peripheral circulation flow. All patients who underwent VAIVT showed a decrease in SSI to &lt;1.0 after VAIVT, probably due to improvement of stenosis. SSI differed significantly between patients who did and did not require VAIVT (1.20 ± 0.49 vs. 0.65 ± 0.33, p &lt; 0.001), which indicates that SSI is affected by the presence of stenosis in the proximal vein of the VA anastomosis. In patients with SSI ≥1.0, stenosis of the proximal vein of the AVF caused stasis of blood flow, resulting in increased peripheral blood flow. AVF site seems to have no impact on peripheral circulation flow. The SSI cutoff value for the screening of proximal vein stenosis was 1.06 (sensitivity: 0.69, specificity: 0.93, area under the curve: 0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the ROC analysis, we recommend considering AVF ultrasound for SSI &gt;1.06. Our results suggest the usefulness of the described VA management method using the LDF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiorenal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"232-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664318/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiorenal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528897\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorenal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:血管通路(VA)管理的各种方法已被研究。我们研究了一种新的、简单的、定量的VA管理方法的有效性,该方法使用口袋LDF®激光血流仪(以下简称“LDF”),无创测量外周循环流量。方法:对82例(男性43例)伴有动静脉瘘(AVF)的维持性血液透析患者进行外周循环流量测定。分流对称指数(SSI)计算为AVF肢体周围循环流量除以非AVF肢体的循环流量。采用SSI进行微循环评价,并与AVF位点进行比较。行血管通路介入治疗(VAIVT)的患者在VAIVT前后分别行AVF和SSI的超声评价(多普勒超声)。比较需要和不需要VAIVT的患者的SSI,并通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析确定SSI的截止值。结果:测量外周循环流量的患者中,高达86%的SSI < 1.0,表明AVF降低了外周循环流量。所有接受VAIVT的患者在VAIVT后SSI下降到< 1.0,可能是由于狭窄的改善。使用和不使用VAIVT的患者SSI差异显著(1.20±0.49 vs 0.65±0.33,p < 0.001),说明SSI受VA吻合口近端静脉狭窄的影响。SSI≥1.0的患者,AVF近端静脉狭窄导致血流淤滞,外周血流量增加。AVF部位似乎对周围循环流量没有影响。筛选近端静脉狭窄的SSI截止值为1.06(敏感性:0.69,特异性:0.93,曲线下面积:0.81)。讨论/结论:基于ROC分析,我们建议对SSI > 1.06的患者考虑AVF超声。我们的研究结果表明,所描述的使用LDF的VA管理方法是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness of a Novel Vascular Access Management Method Using a Laser Blood Flowmeter.

Introduction: Various methods for vascular access (VA) management have been studied. We investigated the usefulness of a new, simple, and quantitative VA management method using the Pocket LDF® laser blood flowmeter (hereinafter "LDF") that noninvasively measures peripheral circulation flow.

Methods: Peripheral circulation flow was measured in 82 patients (43 men) on maintenance hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The shunt symmetry index (SSI) was calculated as peripheral circulation flow in the AVF limb divided by that in the non-AVF limb. SSI was used for microcirculation evaluation and also compared by AVF site. Patients undergoing vascular access interventional therapy (VAIVT) underwent ultrasound evaluation (Doppler ultrasonography) of the AVF and SSI measurement before and after VAIVT. SSI was compared between those who did and did not require VAIVT, and the cutoff value for SSI was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

Results: As many as 86% of the patients who were measured peripheral circulation flow had SSI <1.0, which indicates that AVF reduced peripheral circulation flow. All patients who underwent VAIVT showed a decrease in SSI to <1.0 after VAIVT, probably due to improvement of stenosis. SSI differed significantly between patients who did and did not require VAIVT (1.20 ± 0.49 vs. 0.65 ± 0.33, p < 0.001), which indicates that SSI is affected by the presence of stenosis in the proximal vein of the VA anastomosis. In patients with SSI ≥1.0, stenosis of the proximal vein of the AVF caused stasis of blood flow, resulting in increased peripheral blood flow. AVF site seems to have no impact on peripheral circulation flow. The SSI cutoff value for the screening of proximal vein stenosis was 1.06 (sensitivity: 0.69, specificity: 0.93, area under the curve: 0.81).

Conclusion: Based on the ROC analysis, we recommend considering AVF ultrasound for SSI >1.06. Our results suggest the usefulness of the described VA management method using the LDF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiorenal Medicine
Cardiorenal Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal ''Cardiorenal Medicine'' explores the mechanisms by which obesity and other metabolic abnormalities promote the pathogenesis and progression of heart and kidney disease (cardiorenal metabolic syndrome). It provides an interdisciplinary platform for the advancement of research and clinical practice, focussing on translational issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信