在净零北海能源系统中集成电力和氢海上电网的好处

IF 13 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Rafael Martínez-Gordón , Laura Gusatu , Germán Morales-España , Jos Sijm , André Faaij
{"title":"在净零北海能源系统中集成电力和氢海上电网的好处","authors":"Rafael Martínez-Gordón ,&nbsp;Laura Gusatu ,&nbsp;Germán Morales-España ,&nbsp;Jos Sijm ,&nbsp;André Faaij","doi":"10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The North Sea Offshore Grid concept has been envisioned as a promising alternative to: 1) ease the integration of offshore wind and onshore energy systems, and 2) increase the cross-border capacity between the North Sea region countries at low cost. In this paper we explore the techno-economic benefits of the North Sea Offshore Grid using two case studies: a power-based offshore grid, where only investments in power assets are allowed (i.e. offshore wind, HVDC/HVAC interconnectors); and a power-and-hydrogen offshore grid, where investments in offshore hydrogen assets are also permitted (i.e. offshore electrolysers, new hydrogen pipelines and retrofitted natural gas pipelines). In this paper we present a novel methodology, in which extensive offshore spatial data is analysed to define meaningful regions via data clustering. These regions are incorporated to the <strong>I</strong>ntegrated <strong>E</strong>nergy <strong>S</strong>ystem <strong>A</strong>nalysis for the <strong>N</strong>orth <strong>S</strong>ea region (IESA-NS) model. In this optimization model, the scenarios are run without any specific technology ban and under open optimization. The scenario results show that the deployment of an offshore grid provides relevant cost savings, ranging from 1% to 4.1% of relative cost decrease (2.3 bn € to 8.7 bn €) in the power-based, and ranging from 2.8% to 7% of relative cost decrease (6 bn € to 14.9 bn €) in the power-and-hydrogen based. In the most extreme scenario an offshore grid permits to integrate 283 GW of HVDC connected offshore wind and 196 GW of HVDC meshed interconnectors. Even in the most conservative scenario the offshore grid integrates 59 GW of HVDC connected offshore wind capacity and 92 GW of HVDC meshed interconnectors. When allowed, the deployment of offshore electrolysis is considerable, ranging from 61 GW to 96 GW, with capacity factors of around 30%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34615,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Applied Energy","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000154/pdfft?md5=b47b559d263d07ea7ade207642de50f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666792422000154-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of an integrated power and hydrogen offshore grid in a net‐zero North Sea energy system\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Martínez-Gordón ,&nbsp;Laura Gusatu ,&nbsp;Germán Morales-España ,&nbsp;Jos Sijm ,&nbsp;André Faaij\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The North Sea Offshore Grid concept has been envisioned as a promising alternative to: 1) ease the integration of offshore wind and onshore energy systems, and 2) increase the cross-border capacity between the North Sea region countries at low cost. In this paper we explore the techno-economic benefits of the North Sea Offshore Grid using two case studies: a power-based offshore grid, where only investments in power assets are allowed (i.e. offshore wind, HVDC/HVAC interconnectors); and a power-and-hydrogen offshore grid, where investments in offshore hydrogen assets are also permitted (i.e. offshore electrolysers, new hydrogen pipelines and retrofitted natural gas pipelines). In this paper we present a novel methodology, in which extensive offshore spatial data is analysed to define meaningful regions via data clustering. These regions are incorporated to the <strong>I</strong>ntegrated <strong>E</strong>nergy <strong>S</strong>ystem <strong>A</strong>nalysis for the <strong>N</strong>orth <strong>S</strong>ea region (IESA-NS) model. In this optimization model, the scenarios are run without any specific technology ban and under open optimization. The scenario results show that the deployment of an offshore grid provides relevant cost savings, ranging from 1% to 4.1% of relative cost decrease (2.3 bn € to 8.7 bn €) in the power-based, and ranging from 2.8% to 7% of relative cost decrease (6 bn € to 14.9 bn €) in the power-and-hydrogen based. In the most extreme scenario an offshore grid permits to integrate 283 GW of HVDC connected offshore wind and 196 GW of HVDC meshed interconnectors. Even in the most conservative scenario the offshore grid integrates 59 GW of HVDC connected offshore wind capacity and 92 GW of HVDC meshed interconnectors. When allowed, the deployment of offshore electrolysis is considerable, ranging from 61 GW to 96 GW, with capacity factors of around 30%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000154/pdfft?md5=b47b559d263d07ea7ade207642de50f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666792422000154-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

北海海上电网的概念被设想为一种有前景的替代方案:1)简化海上风能和陆上能源系统的整合,2)以低成本增加北海地区国家之间的跨境容量。在本文中,我们通过两个案例研究探讨了北海海上电网的技术经济效益:基于电力的海上电网,只允许对电力资产进行投资(即海上风电,HVDC/HVAC互连器);还有一个电力和氢海上电网,允许对海上氢资产进行投资(即海上电解槽、新的氢管道和改造的天然气管道)。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的方法,该方法通过分析大量的近海空间数据,通过数据聚类来定义有意义的区域。这些地区被纳入北海地区综合能源系统分析(IESA-NS)模型。在该优化模型中,场景在没有任何特定技术限制的情况下运行,并且在开放式优化下运行。情景结果表明,海上电网的部署提供了相关的成本节约,电力基础设施的相对成本降低幅度为1%至4.1%(23亿欧元至87亿欧元),电力和氢基础设施的相对成本降低幅度为2.8%至7%(60亿欧元至149亿欧元)。在最极端的情况下,海上电网允许整合283吉瓦的高压直流连接海上风电和196吉瓦的高压直流并网互联。即使在最保守的情况下,海上电网也整合了59吉瓦的高压直流连接的海上风电容量和92吉瓦的高压直流并网互联。在允许的情况下,海上电解的部署相当可观,从61吉瓦到96吉瓦不等,容量系数约为30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefits of an integrated power and hydrogen offshore grid in a net‐zero North Sea energy system

The North Sea Offshore Grid concept has been envisioned as a promising alternative to: 1) ease the integration of offshore wind and onshore energy systems, and 2) increase the cross-border capacity between the North Sea region countries at low cost. In this paper we explore the techno-economic benefits of the North Sea Offshore Grid using two case studies: a power-based offshore grid, where only investments in power assets are allowed (i.e. offshore wind, HVDC/HVAC interconnectors); and a power-and-hydrogen offshore grid, where investments in offshore hydrogen assets are also permitted (i.e. offshore electrolysers, new hydrogen pipelines and retrofitted natural gas pipelines). In this paper we present a novel methodology, in which extensive offshore spatial data is analysed to define meaningful regions via data clustering. These regions are incorporated to the Integrated Energy System Analysis for the North Sea region (IESA-NS) model. In this optimization model, the scenarios are run without any specific technology ban and under open optimization. The scenario results show that the deployment of an offshore grid provides relevant cost savings, ranging from 1% to 4.1% of relative cost decrease (2.3 bn € to 8.7 bn €) in the power-based, and ranging from 2.8% to 7% of relative cost decrease (6 bn € to 14.9 bn €) in the power-and-hydrogen based. In the most extreme scenario an offshore grid permits to integrate 283 GW of HVDC connected offshore wind and 196 GW of HVDC meshed interconnectors. Even in the most conservative scenario the offshore grid integrates 59 GW of HVDC connected offshore wind capacity and 92 GW of HVDC meshed interconnectors. When allowed, the deployment of offshore electrolysis is considerable, ranging from 61 GW to 96 GW, with capacity factors of around 30%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Applied Energy
Advances in Applied Energy Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信