腹腔镜下腹膜内合成补片腹疝修补:一项10年回顾性观察研究

Q3 Medicine
Bramhavar Shamburao Ramesh, Hosni Mubarak Khan, Yashshwini B. Kareti
{"title":"腹腔镜下腹膜内合成补片腹疝修补:一项10年回顾性观察研究","authors":"Bramhavar Shamburao Ramesh,&nbsp;Hosni Mubarak Khan,&nbsp;Yashshwini B. Kareti","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2021.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Ventral hernia is an anterior abdominal wall hernia, with an incidence of 2%–13%. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is the preferred method worldwide with all the advantages of the laparoscopic technique proven to be an effective treatment option. This study aims to assess the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic management of ventral hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) or intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM PLUS) technique with the usage of variety of synthetic meshes intraperitoneally.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study of 821 patients of a single institution for a decade was conducted. Long-term outcomes such as pain, mesh infections, enterocutaneous fistula, bowel adhesions and recurrence were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 801 primary, 12 incisional, and 8 recurrent hernia cases, including 532 females and 289 males with a mean age of 45.62±9.37 years. IPOM PLUS were underwent in 674 (82.10%) cases. Polypropylene, dual, titanium, composite meshes were applied in 473 (57.61%), 208 (25.33%), 82 (9.99%), and 58 (7.06%) cases respectively. Intraoperative bleeding occurred in 3 (0.37%) cases, seroma in 8 (0.97%), wound infection in 4 (0.49%), stitch abscess in 2 (0.24%). Recurrence was found in 8 (0.97%) cases, with 5 used polypropylene mesh and 3 used dual mesh. Mesh infections were discovered in 6 (2.88%) cases used dual, and foreign body sensation in 4 (0.85%) cases used polypropylene. Three (0.37%) patients had suture site hernia, and 3 (0.37%) had chronic sinus.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IPOM or IPOM PLUS holds good in small or medium sized ventral hernias. The safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh is comparable to that of other synthetic meshes. A mesh overlap of minimum 5 cm beyond defect edge is must to minimise hernia recurrence. Absorbable suture can be considered as alternative to tackers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 116-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000724/pdfft?md5=31e614415c7495adf5db2743180dcc2a&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900921000724-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic management of ventral hernia repair using intraperitoneal synthetic mesh: A 10-year retrospective observational study\",\"authors\":\"Bramhavar Shamburao Ramesh,&nbsp;Hosni Mubarak Khan,&nbsp;Yashshwini B. Kareti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lers.2021.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Ventral hernia is an anterior abdominal wall hernia, with an incidence of 2%–13%. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is the preferred method worldwide with all the advantages of the laparoscopic technique proven to be an effective treatment option. This study aims to assess the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic management of ventral hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) or intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM PLUS) technique with the usage of variety of synthetic meshes intraperitoneally.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study of 821 patients of a single institution for a decade was conducted. Long-term outcomes such as pain, mesh infections, enterocutaneous fistula, bowel adhesions and recurrence were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 801 primary, 12 incisional, and 8 recurrent hernia cases, including 532 females and 289 males with a mean age of 45.62±9.37 years. IPOM PLUS were underwent in 674 (82.10%) cases. Polypropylene, dual, titanium, composite meshes were applied in 473 (57.61%), 208 (25.33%), 82 (9.99%), and 58 (7.06%) cases respectively. Intraoperative bleeding occurred in 3 (0.37%) cases, seroma in 8 (0.97%), wound infection in 4 (0.49%), stitch abscess in 2 (0.24%). Recurrence was found in 8 (0.97%) cases, with 5 used polypropylene mesh and 3 used dual mesh. Mesh infections were discovered in 6 (2.88%) cases used dual, and foreign body sensation in 4 (0.85%) cases used polypropylene. Three (0.37%) patients had suture site hernia, and 3 (0.37%) had chronic sinus.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IPOM or IPOM PLUS holds good in small or medium sized ventral hernias. The safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh is comparable to that of other synthetic meshes. A mesh overlap of minimum 5 cm beyond defect edge is must to minimise hernia recurrence. Absorbable suture can be considered as alternative to tackers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 116-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000724/pdfft?md5=31e614415c7495adf5db2743180dcc2a&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900921000724-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900921000724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的腹壁疝是一种前腹壁疝,发生率为2% ~ 13%。腹腔镜腹疝修补术是世界范围内的首选方法,腹腔镜技术的所有优点被证明是一种有效的治疗选择。本研究旨在评估使用腹膜内嵌补片(IPOM)或腹膜内嵌补片缺损闭合(IPOM PLUS)技术并使用多种合成腹膜内补片的腹腔镜腹疝修补术的长期疗效。方法对某医院821例患者进行10年的回顾性研究。评估长期预后,如疼痛、补片感染、肠皮瘘、肠粘连和复发。结果原发性疝801例,切口疝12例,复发疝8例,其中女性532例,男性289例,平均年龄45.62±9.37岁。674例(82.10%)行IPOM +治疗。聚丙烯网、双网、钛网、复合网分别为473例(57.61%)、208例(25.33%)、82例(9.99%)和58例(7.06%)。术中出血3例(0.37%),血清肿8例(0.97%),伤口感染4例(0.49%),针孔脓肿2例(0.24%)。复发8例(0.97%),其中聚丙烯补片5例,双补片3例。双补片组6例(2.88%)出现补片感染,聚丙烯组4例(0.85%)出现异物感。缝合处疝3例(0.37%),慢性鼻窦3例(0.37%)。结论IPOM或IPOM +治疗中小型腹疝效果较好。聚丙烯腹膜网的安全性和有效性与其他合成网相当。为了尽量减少疝的复发,补片的重叠必须超过缺损边缘至少5厘米。可吸收缝合线可被认为是粘接剂的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic management of ventral hernia repair using intraperitoneal synthetic mesh: A 10-year retrospective observational study

Objective

Ventral hernia is an anterior abdominal wall hernia, with an incidence of 2%–13%. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is the preferred method worldwide with all the advantages of the laparoscopic technique proven to be an effective treatment option. This study aims to assess the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic management of ventral hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) or intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM PLUS) technique with the usage of variety of synthetic meshes intraperitoneally.

Methods

A retrospective study of 821 patients of a single institution for a decade was conducted. Long-term outcomes such as pain, mesh infections, enterocutaneous fistula, bowel adhesions and recurrence were assessed.

Results

There were 801 primary, 12 incisional, and 8 recurrent hernia cases, including 532 females and 289 males with a mean age of 45.62±9.37 years. IPOM PLUS were underwent in 674 (82.10%) cases. Polypropylene, dual, titanium, composite meshes were applied in 473 (57.61%), 208 (25.33%), 82 (9.99%), and 58 (7.06%) cases respectively. Intraoperative bleeding occurred in 3 (0.37%) cases, seroma in 8 (0.97%), wound infection in 4 (0.49%), stitch abscess in 2 (0.24%). Recurrence was found in 8 (0.97%) cases, with 5 used polypropylene mesh and 3 used dual mesh. Mesh infections were discovered in 6 (2.88%) cases used dual, and foreign body sensation in 4 (0.85%) cases used polypropylene. Three (0.37%) patients had suture site hernia, and 3 (0.37%) had chronic sinus.

Conclusion

IPOM or IPOM PLUS holds good in small or medium sized ventral hernias. The safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal polypropylene mesh is comparable to that of other synthetic meshes. A mesh overlap of minimum 5 cm beyond defect edge is must to minimise hernia recurrence. Absorbable suture can be considered as alternative to tackers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信