报告外科创新的修改:一个系统的范围审查方案。

IF 1.1 Q3 SURGERY
International Journal of Surgery Protocols Pub Date : 2021-11-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.29337/ijsp.167
Christin Hoffmann, Sina Hossaini, Sian Cousins, Natalie Blencowe, Angus G K McNair, Jane M Blazeby, Kerry N L Avery, Shelley Potter, Rhiannon Macefield
{"title":"报告外科创新的修改:一个系统的范围审查方案。","authors":"Christin Hoffmann, Sina Hossaini, Sian Cousins, Natalie Blencowe, Angus G K McNair, Jane M Blazeby, Kerry N L Avery, Shelley Potter, Rhiannon Macefield","doi":"10.29337/ijsp.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Innovation in surgery drives improvements to patient care. New surgical procedures and devices typically undergo a series of modifications as they are developed and refined during their introduction into clinical practice. These changes should ideally be reported and shared between surgeon-innovators to promote efficient, safe and transparent innovation. Currently, agreement on how modifications should be defined, conceptualised and classified, so they can be reported and shared efficiently and transparently, is lacking. The aim of this review is to examine and summarise existing literature on definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications to surgical procedures/devices, including views on how to measure and report them. The findings will inform future work to standardise reporting and sharing of modifications in surgical innovation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic scoping review will be conducted adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles will focus on review articles and opinion pieces relevant to modifications to new surgical procedures or devices introduced to clinical practice. Methods to identify relevant literature will include systematic searches in MEDLINE (Ovid version), targeted internet searches (Google Scholar) and snowball searches. A two-stage screening process (titles/abstracts/keywords and full-texts) will use specified exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify eligible articles. Data on how modifications are i) defined, ii) perceived, and iii) classified, and iv) views on how modifications should be measured and reported, will be extracted verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis will be applied to extracted data where appropriate. Results will be presented as a narrative summary including descriptive characteristics of included articles. Findings will inform a preliminary conceptual framework to facilitate the systematic reporting and sharing of modifications to novel procedures and devices.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This work will generate an in-depth understanding of how modifications are currently defined, perceived and classified, and views on how they may be reported, in the context of surgical innovation.Rigorous and comprehensive search methods will be applied to identify a wide range of diverse data sources for inclusion in the review.A summary of existing relevant literature on modifications is a necessary step to inform development of a framework for transparent, real-time reporting and sharing of modifications in future studies of innovative invasive procedures/devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":"25 1","pages":"250-256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588892/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Christin Hoffmann, Sina Hossaini, Sian Cousins, Natalie Blencowe, Angus G K McNair, Jane M Blazeby, Kerry N L Avery, Shelley Potter, Rhiannon Macefield\",\"doi\":\"10.29337/ijsp.167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Innovation in surgery drives improvements to patient care. New surgical procedures and devices typically undergo a series of modifications as they are developed and refined during their introduction into clinical practice. These changes should ideally be reported and shared between surgeon-innovators to promote efficient, safe and transparent innovation. Currently, agreement on how modifications should be defined, conceptualised and classified, so they can be reported and shared efficiently and transparently, is lacking. The aim of this review is to examine and summarise existing literature on definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications to surgical procedures/devices, including views on how to measure and report them. The findings will inform future work to standardise reporting and sharing of modifications in surgical innovation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic scoping review will be conducted adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles will focus on review articles and opinion pieces relevant to modifications to new surgical procedures or devices introduced to clinical practice. Methods to identify relevant literature will include systematic searches in MEDLINE (Ovid version), targeted internet searches (Google Scholar) and snowball searches. A two-stage screening process (titles/abstracts/keywords and full-texts) will use specified exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify eligible articles. Data on how modifications are i) defined, ii) perceived, and iii) classified, and iv) views on how modifications should be measured and reported, will be extracted verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis will be applied to extracted data where appropriate. Results will be presented as a narrative summary including descriptive characteristics of included articles. Findings will inform a preliminary conceptual framework to facilitate the systematic reporting and sharing of modifications to novel procedures and devices.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This work will generate an in-depth understanding of how modifications are currently defined, perceived and classified, and views on how they may be reported, in the context of surgical innovation.Rigorous and comprehensive search methods will be applied to identify a wide range of diverse data sources for inclusion in the review.A summary of existing relevant literature on modifications is a necessary step to inform development of a framework for transparent, real-time reporting and sharing of modifications in future studies of innovative invasive procedures/devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery Protocols\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"250-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8588892/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

引言:外科手术的创新推动了患者护理的改善。新的外科手术程序和设备在引入临床实践过程中,通常会经过一系列的改进。理想情况下,这些变化应该在外科医生创新者之间报告和分享,以促进高效、安全和透明的创新。目前,对于如何定义、概念化和分类修改,以便能够高效透明地报告和共享,还缺乏一致意见。这篇综述的目的是检查和总结现有的关于外科手术/器械修改的定义、看法和分类的文献,包括关于如何测量和报告它们的观点。这些发现将为未来的工作提供信息,以标准化手术创新修改的报告和共享。材料和方法:将根据PRISMA ScR指南进行系统的范围界定审查。收录的文章将集中在与临床实践中引入的新外科手术或器械的修改相关的综述文章和意见文章上。识别相关文献的方法包括MEDLINE(Ovid版本)中的系统搜索、有针对性的互联网搜索(Google Scholar)和滚雪球搜索。两阶段筛选过程(标题/摘要/关键词和全文)将使用指定的排除/纳入标准来确定符合条件的文章。将逐字提取关于修改i)定义、ii)感知和iii)分类的数据,以及iv)关于修改应如何衡量和报告的观点的数据。将酌情对提取的数据进行归纳专题分析。结果将以叙述性总结的形式呈现,包括所收录文章的描述性特征。研究结果将为初步概念框架提供信息,以促进系统报告和共享对新程序和装置的修改。亮点:这项工作将深入了解目前如何定义、感知和分类修改,以及在外科创新的背景下如何报告修改的观点。将采用严格和全面的搜索方法来确定广泛多样的数据来源,以纳入审查。总结现有的修改相关文献是制定透明、实时报告框架的必要步骤,并在未来的创新侵入性程序/设备研究中共享修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol.

Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol.

Introduction: Innovation in surgery drives improvements to patient care. New surgical procedures and devices typically undergo a series of modifications as they are developed and refined during their introduction into clinical practice. These changes should ideally be reported and shared between surgeon-innovators to promote efficient, safe and transparent innovation. Currently, agreement on how modifications should be defined, conceptualised and classified, so they can be reported and shared efficiently and transparently, is lacking. The aim of this review is to examine and summarise existing literature on definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications to surgical procedures/devices, including views on how to measure and report them. The findings will inform future work to standardise reporting and sharing of modifications in surgical innovation.

Materials and methods: A systematic scoping review will be conducted adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles will focus on review articles and opinion pieces relevant to modifications to new surgical procedures or devices introduced to clinical practice. Methods to identify relevant literature will include systematic searches in MEDLINE (Ovid version), targeted internet searches (Google Scholar) and snowball searches. A two-stage screening process (titles/abstracts/keywords and full-texts) will use specified exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify eligible articles. Data on how modifications are i) defined, ii) perceived, and iii) classified, and iv) views on how modifications should be measured and reported, will be extracted verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis will be applied to extracted data where appropriate. Results will be presented as a narrative summary including descriptive characteristics of included articles. Findings will inform a preliminary conceptual framework to facilitate the systematic reporting and sharing of modifications to novel procedures and devices.

Highlights: This work will generate an in-depth understanding of how modifications are currently defined, perceived and classified, and views on how they may be reported, in the context of surgical innovation.Rigorous and comprehensive search methods will be applied to identify a wide range of diverse data sources for inclusion in the review.A summary of existing relevant literature on modifications is a necessary step to inform development of a framework for transparent, real-time reporting and sharing of modifications in future studies of innovative invasive procedures/devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信