贝伐单抗治疗her2阴性炎性乳腺癌

F. Bertucci, A. Gonçalves, P. Viens
{"title":"贝伐单抗治疗her2阴性炎性乳腺癌","authors":"F. Bertucci, A. Gonçalves, P. Viens","doi":"10.18632/oncoscience.324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare (~5%) but aggressive form of breast cancer with high metastatic potential [1]. Despite the successful introduction of neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy, combined with neoadjuvant/adjuvant trastuzumab in case of HER2-positivity and adjuvant hormone therapy in case of hormone receptor (HR)-positivity, the 5-year survival ranges from 50 to 60% as compared to more than 85% in non-IBC. Besides its aggressiveness and frequent resistance to treatment, IBC displays other characteristics that make progresses difficult. The disease is rare and the diagnosis challenging, based on clinical signs including rapid (no more than 6 months) onset of breast erythema and oedema, with or without underlying palpable mass. Such features exclude IBC from mass screening, lead to frequent misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, and complicate the setup of IBC-specific clinical trials. However, IBC is biologically different from non-IBC [2]. Notably, IBCs are more angiogenic tumours than non-IBC, displaying higher microvessel density, and showing presence of dermal lymphovascular tumour emboli. Combined with the negative prognostic value of VEGF expression, these observations made IBC attractive for testing anti-angiogenic drugs. Based on these observations, and with the intent to continue to study IBC as a separate entity as we did previously [3, 4], we launched in 2008 the BEVERLY-1 trial, a French, multicentric, single arm, prospective phase 2 trial assessing the benefit of neoadjuvant/ adjuvant bevacizumab in patients with HER2-negative (BEVERLY-1) non-metastatic IBC. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumour angiogenesis by targeting VEGF, approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration under an accelerated plan in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. During the neo-adjuvant phase, the patients received four cycles of FEC100 plus bevacizumab every three weeks, followed by four cycles of docetaxel plus bevacizumab every three weeks. Then, the surgery included total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection, and was followed by adjuvant radiation therapy plus 10 cycles of bevacizumab (every 3 weeks), and hormone therapy if the tumour was HR-positive. Each patient theoretically received 8 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and 18 cycles of neo-adjuvant/adjuvant bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast and axillary lymph nodes after neo-adjuvant treatment, centrally assessed using the Sataloff classification: the regimen was regarded as efficacious if 30% or more patients had a pCR. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and analysis of circulating tumour cells and endothelial cells. BEVERLY-1 was the …","PeriodicalId":94164,"journal":{"name":"Oncoscience","volume":"19 1","pages":"297 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bevacizumab in HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"F. Bertucci, A. Gonçalves, P. Viens\",\"doi\":\"10.18632/oncoscience.324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare (~5%) but aggressive form of breast cancer with high metastatic potential [1]. Despite the successful introduction of neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy, combined with neoadjuvant/adjuvant trastuzumab in case of HER2-positivity and adjuvant hormone therapy in case of hormone receptor (HR)-positivity, the 5-year survival ranges from 50 to 60% as compared to more than 85% in non-IBC. Besides its aggressiveness and frequent resistance to treatment, IBC displays other characteristics that make progresses difficult. The disease is rare and the diagnosis challenging, based on clinical signs including rapid (no more than 6 months) onset of breast erythema and oedema, with or without underlying palpable mass. Such features exclude IBC from mass screening, lead to frequent misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, and complicate the setup of IBC-specific clinical trials. However, IBC is biologically different from non-IBC [2]. Notably, IBCs are more angiogenic tumours than non-IBC, displaying higher microvessel density, and showing presence of dermal lymphovascular tumour emboli. Combined with the negative prognostic value of VEGF expression, these observations made IBC attractive for testing anti-angiogenic drugs. Based on these observations, and with the intent to continue to study IBC as a separate entity as we did previously [3, 4], we launched in 2008 the BEVERLY-1 trial, a French, multicentric, single arm, prospective phase 2 trial assessing the benefit of neoadjuvant/ adjuvant bevacizumab in patients with HER2-negative (BEVERLY-1) non-metastatic IBC. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumour angiogenesis by targeting VEGF, approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration under an accelerated plan in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. During the neo-adjuvant phase, the patients received four cycles of FEC100 plus bevacizumab every three weeks, followed by four cycles of docetaxel plus bevacizumab every three weeks. Then, the surgery included total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection, and was followed by adjuvant radiation therapy plus 10 cycles of bevacizumab (every 3 weeks), and hormone therapy if the tumour was HR-positive. Each patient theoretically received 8 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and 18 cycles of neo-adjuvant/adjuvant bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast and axillary lymph nodes after neo-adjuvant treatment, centrally assessed using the Sataloff classification: the regimen was regarded as efficacious if 30% or more patients had a pCR. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and analysis of circulating tumour cells and endothelial cells. BEVERLY-1 was the …\",\"PeriodicalId\":94164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncoscience\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"297 - 298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

炎症性乳腺癌(IBC)是一种罕见的(约5%)但具有高转移潜力的侵袭性乳腺癌[1]。尽管成功引入了以蒽环类/紫杉烷为基础的新辅助化疗,在her2阳性的情况下联合新辅助/辅助曲妥珠单抗,在激素受体(HR)阳性的情况下联合辅助激素治疗,但5年生存率在50%至60%之间,而非ibc患者的5年生存率超过85%。除了其侵袭性和对治疗的频繁抵抗外,IBC还表现出其他特征,使其难以取得进展。此病罕见,诊断具有挑战性,基于临床症状包括快速(不超过6个月)发作的乳房红斑和水肿,伴有或不伴有可触及的肿块。这些特征使IBC无法进行大规模筛查,导致经常误诊和延误诊断,并使IBC特异性临床试验的设置复杂化。然而,IBC在生物学上不同于非IBC[2]。值得注意的是,与非ibc相比,ibc是血管生成性肿瘤,微血管密度更高,并表现出真皮淋巴血管肿瘤栓塞。结合VEGF表达的负面预后价值,这些观察结果使IBC成为测试抗血管生成药物的吸引力。基于这些观察结果,并打算继续像我们之前那样将IBC作为一个单独的实体进行研究[3,4],我们于2008年启动了beverley -1试验,这是一项法国多中心、单组、前瞻性2期试验,评估新辅助/辅助贝伐单抗对her2阴性(beverley -1)非转移性IBC患者的益处。贝伐珠单抗是一种通过靶向VEGF抑制肿瘤血管生成的单克隆抗体,于2008年获得美国食品和药物管理局(fda)批准,该药物与化疗联合用于转移性乳腺癌。在新辅助治疗阶段,患者每三周接受四个周期的FEC100加贝伐单抗治疗,随后每三周接受四个周期的多西他赛加贝伐单抗治疗。然后,手术包括全乳房切除术和腋窝淋巴结清扫,随后进行辅助放射治疗加10个周期的贝伐单抗(每3周),如果肿瘤呈hr阳性,则进行激素治疗。每位患者理论上接受了8个周期的新辅助化疗和18个周期的新辅助/辅助贝伐单抗。主要终点是新辅助治疗后乳腺和腋窝淋巴结的病理完全缓解(pCR)率,采用Sataloff分类进行集中评估:如果30%或以上的患者有pCR,则认为该方案有效。次要终点包括无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)、安全性以及循环肿瘤细胞和内皮细胞的分析。贝弗莉-我是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bevacizumab in HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare (~5%) but aggressive form of breast cancer with high metastatic potential [1]. Despite the successful introduction of neoadjuvant anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy, combined with neoadjuvant/adjuvant trastuzumab in case of HER2-positivity and adjuvant hormone therapy in case of hormone receptor (HR)-positivity, the 5-year survival ranges from 50 to 60% as compared to more than 85% in non-IBC. Besides its aggressiveness and frequent resistance to treatment, IBC displays other characteristics that make progresses difficult. The disease is rare and the diagnosis challenging, based on clinical signs including rapid (no more than 6 months) onset of breast erythema and oedema, with or without underlying palpable mass. Such features exclude IBC from mass screening, lead to frequent misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, and complicate the setup of IBC-specific clinical trials. However, IBC is biologically different from non-IBC [2]. Notably, IBCs are more angiogenic tumours than non-IBC, displaying higher microvessel density, and showing presence of dermal lymphovascular tumour emboli. Combined with the negative prognostic value of VEGF expression, these observations made IBC attractive for testing anti-angiogenic drugs. Based on these observations, and with the intent to continue to study IBC as a separate entity as we did previously [3, 4], we launched in 2008 the BEVERLY-1 trial, a French, multicentric, single arm, prospective phase 2 trial assessing the benefit of neoadjuvant/ adjuvant bevacizumab in patients with HER2-negative (BEVERLY-1) non-metastatic IBC. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumour angiogenesis by targeting VEGF, approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration under an accelerated plan in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. During the neo-adjuvant phase, the patients received four cycles of FEC100 plus bevacizumab every three weeks, followed by four cycles of docetaxel plus bevacizumab every three weeks. Then, the surgery included total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection, and was followed by adjuvant radiation therapy plus 10 cycles of bevacizumab (every 3 weeks), and hormone therapy if the tumour was HR-positive. Each patient theoretically received 8 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and 18 cycles of neo-adjuvant/adjuvant bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast and axillary lymph nodes after neo-adjuvant treatment, centrally assessed using the Sataloff classification: the regimen was regarded as efficacious if 30% or more patients had a pCR. Secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and analysis of circulating tumour cells and endothelial cells. BEVERLY-1 was the …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信