对欧洲移植区丢弃供肝的关键评估:对机器灌注的潜在影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Falk Rauchfuß, Hans-Michael Tautenhahn, Felix Dondorf, Aladdin Ali-Deeb, Utz Settmacher
{"title":"对欧洲移植区丢弃供肝的关键评估:对机器灌注的潜在影响。","authors":"Falk Rauchfuß,&nbsp;Hans-Michael Tautenhahn,&nbsp;Felix Dondorf,&nbsp;Aladdin Ali-Deeb,&nbsp;Utz Settmacher","doi":"10.12659/AOT.938132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND There are still many offered donor livers that are declined during the allocation process. Machine perfusion offers the option to evaluate (especially marginal) donor organs and to better decide whether a graft has the potential of being transplanted or not. There is a lack of clear detailed data on why organs are declined and how many donor livers would have the potential of being evaluated in the machine. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1356 donor livers between 2016 and 2018, which were offered by Eurotransplant and were declined during the allocation process; 284 grafts were from donor after cardiac death (DCD) and 1072 donations were from after brain death (DBD). The analysis was performed independently and blinded by senior transplant surgeons. RESULTS There were 904 (66.6%) donor livers with potential to be evaluated as suitable grafts in machine perfusion, whereas 417 (30.8%) organs were definitely not-transplantable, mainly due to liver cirrhosis, (untreated) donor malignancy, cardiac diseases of the donor leading to a hepatic congestion, and/or systemic infections in the donor. Donors in blood group \"AB\" were disproportionally often rejected. Due to missing data, 35 (2.6%) organs could not be sufficiently evaluated. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that many declined donor livers have potential of being evaluated by machine perfusion. Comprehensive use of machine perfusion is necessary and useful to improve the current organ shortage.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"28 ","pages":"e938132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/2c/anntransplant-28-e938132.PMC10029319.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Evaluation of Discarded Donor Livers in the Eurotransplant Region: Potential Implications for Machine Perfusion.\",\"authors\":\"Falk Rauchfuß,&nbsp;Hans-Michael Tautenhahn,&nbsp;Felix Dondorf,&nbsp;Aladdin Ali-Deeb,&nbsp;Utz Settmacher\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/AOT.938132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND There are still many offered donor livers that are declined during the allocation process. Machine perfusion offers the option to evaluate (especially marginal) donor organs and to better decide whether a graft has the potential of being transplanted or not. There is a lack of clear detailed data on why organs are declined and how many donor livers would have the potential of being evaluated in the machine. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1356 donor livers between 2016 and 2018, which were offered by Eurotransplant and were declined during the allocation process; 284 grafts were from donor after cardiac death (DCD) and 1072 donations were from after brain death (DBD). The analysis was performed independently and blinded by senior transplant surgeons. RESULTS There were 904 (66.6%) donor livers with potential to be evaluated as suitable grafts in machine perfusion, whereas 417 (30.8%) organs were definitely not-transplantable, mainly due to liver cirrhosis, (untreated) donor malignancy, cardiac diseases of the donor leading to a hepatic congestion, and/or systemic infections in the donor. Donors in blood group \\\"AB\\\" were disproportionally often rejected. Due to missing data, 35 (2.6%) organs could not be sufficiently evaluated. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that many declined donor livers have potential of being evaluated by machine perfusion. Comprehensive use of machine perfusion is necessary and useful to improve the current organ shortage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"e938132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/2c/anntransplant-28-e938132.PMC10029319.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.938132\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.938132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在分配过程中,仍有许多供体肝脏被拒绝。机器灌注提供了评估(特别是边缘)供体器官的选择,并更好地决定移植物是否具有移植的潜力。关于器官被拒绝的原因,以及有多少捐献的肝脏有可能在机器中被评估,目前还缺乏明确的详细数据。材料和方法我们回顾性分析了2016年至2018年期间1356例由Eurotransplant提供并在分配过程中被拒绝的供体肝脏;心脏死亡供体284例,脑死亡供体1072例。该分析由资深移植外科医生独立、盲法进行。结果904例(66.6%)供肝在机器灌注中有可能被评估为合适的移植器官,而417例(30.8%)器官绝对不可移植,主要原因是肝硬化、(未经治疗的)供肝恶性肿瘤、供肝心脏疾病导致肝脏充血和/或供肝全身感染。AB型血的献血者被排斥的比例过高。由于数据缺失,35个(2.6%)器官无法得到充分评估。结论:我们的数据表明,许多衰退的供肝有可能被机器灌注评估。综合运用机器灌注对改善目前器官短缺是必要和有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Critical Evaluation of Discarded Donor Livers in the Eurotransplant Region: Potential Implications for Machine Perfusion.

Critical Evaluation of Discarded Donor Livers in the Eurotransplant Region: Potential Implications for Machine Perfusion.

BACKGROUND There are still many offered donor livers that are declined during the allocation process. Machine perfusion offers the option to evaluate (especially marginal) donor organs and to better decide whether a graft has the potential of being transplanted or not. There is a lack of clear detailed data on why organs are declined and how many donor livers would have the potential of being evaluated in the machine. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1356 donor livers between 2016 and 2018, which were offered by Eurotransplant and were declined during the allocation process; 284 grafts were from donor after cardiac death (DCD) and 1072 donations were from after brain death (DBD). The analysis was performed independently and blinded by senior transplant surgeons. RESULTS There were 904 (66.6%) donor livers with potential to be evaluated as suitable grafts in machine perfusion, whereas 417 (30.8%) organs were definitely not-transplantable, mainly due to liver cirrhosis, (untreated) donor malignancy, cardiac diseases of the donor leading to a hepatic congestion, and/or systemic infections in the donor. Donors in blood group "AB" were disproportionally often rejected. Due to missing data, 35 (2.6%) organs could not be sufficiently evaluated. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that many declined donor livers have potential of being evaluated by machine perfusion. Comprehensive use of machine perfusion is necessary and useful to improve the current organ shortage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信