污水污泥中磷回收的环境可持续性机遇和社会经济成本分析

IF 14 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jiawen Xie , Xingchen Zhuge , Xixi Liu , Qian Zhang , Yiwen Liu , Peizhe Sun , Yingxin Zhao , Yindong Tong
{"title":"污水污泥中磷回收的环境可持续性机遇和社会经济成本分析","authors":"Jiawen Xie ,&nbsp;Xingchen Zhuge ,&nbsp;Xixi Liu ,&nbsp;Qian Zhang ,&nbsp;Yiwen Liu ,&nbsp;Peizhe Sun ,&nbsp;Yingxin Zhao ,&nbsp;Yindong Tong","doi":"10.1016/j.ese.2023.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although phosphorus (P) recovery and management from sewage sludge are practiced in North America and Europe, such practices are not yet to be implemented in China. Here, we evaluated the environmental sustainability opportunity and socio-economic costs of recovering P from sewage sludge by replacing the current-day treatments (CT; sludge treatment and landfill) and P chemical fertilizer application (CF) in China using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods. Three potential P recovery scenarios (PR<sub>1</sub>‒PR<sub>3</sub>: struvite, vivianite, and treated sludge) and corresponding current-day scenarios (CT<sub>1</sub>‒CT<sub>3</sub> and CF) were considered. Results indicated that PR<sub>1</sub> and PR<sub>2</sub> have smaller environmental impacts than the current-day scenarios, whereas PR<sub>3</sub> has larger impacts in most categories. PR<sub>3</sub> has the lowest net costs (sum of internal costs and benefits, 39.1–54.7 CNY per kg P), whereas PR<sub>2</sub> has the lowest external costs (366.8 CNY per kg P). Societal costs for production and land use of 1 kg P by P recovery from sewage sludge (e.g., ∼527 CNY for PR<sub>1</sub>) are much higher than those of P chemical fertilizers (∼20 CNY for CF). However, considering the costs in the current-day treatments (e.g., ∼524 CNY for CT<sub>1</sub>), societal costs of P recovery scenarios are close to or slightly lower than those of current-day scenarios. Among the three P recovery scenarios, we found that recovering struvite as P fertilizer has the highest societal feasibility. This study will provide valuable information for improved sewage sludge management and will help promote the sustainable supply of P in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34434,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100258"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/43/main.PMC10024106.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental sustainability opportunity and socio-economic cost analyses of phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge\",\"authors\":\"Jiawen Xie ,&nbsp;Xingchen Zhuge ,&nbsp;Xixi Liu ,&nbsp;Qian Zhang ,&nbsp;Yiwen Liu ,&nbsp;Peizhe Sun ,&nbsp;Yingxin Zhao ,&nbsp;Yindong Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ese.2023.100258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although phosphorus (P) recovery and management from sewage sludge are practiced in North America and Europe, such practices are not yet to be implemented in China. Here, we evaluated the environmental sustainability opportunity and socio-economic costs of recovering P from sewage sludge by replacing the current-day treatments (CT; sludge treatment and landfill) and P chemical fertilizer application (CF) in China using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods. Three potential P recovery scenarios (PR<sub>1</sub>‒PR<sub>3</sub>: struvite, vivianite, and treated sludge) and corresponding current-day scenarios (CT<sub>1</sub>‒CT<sub>3</sub> and CF) were considered. Results indicated that PR<sub>1</sub> and PR<sub>2</sub> have smaller environmental impacts than the current-day scenarios, whereas PR<sub>3</sub> has larger impacts in most categories. PR<sub>3</sub> has the lowest net costs (sum of internal costs and benefits, 39.1–54.7 CNY per kg P), whereas PR<sub>2</sub> has the lowest external costs (366.8 CNY per kg P). Societal costs for production and land use of 1 kg P by P recovery from sewage sludge (e.g., ∼527 CNY for PR<sub>1</sub>) are much higher than those of P chemical fertilizers (∼20 CNY for CF). However, considering the costs in the current-day treatments (e.g., ∼524 CNY for CT<sub>1</sub>), societal costs of P recovery scenarios are close to or slightly lower than those of current-day scenarios. Among the three P recovery scenarios, we found that recovering struvite as P fertilizer has the highest societal feasibility. This study will provide valuable information for improved sewage sludge management and will help promote the sustainable supply of P in China.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c8/43/main.PMC10024106.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498423000236\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498423000236","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管北美和欧洲已经开始从污水污泥中回收和管理磷,但这种做法尚未在中国实施。在这里,我们评估了环境可持续性机会和社会经济成本,从污水污泥中回收磷取代目前的处理(CT;利用生命周期评价和生命周期成本法对中国的污泥处理和垃圾填埋)和磷肥施用(CF)进行了研究。考虑了三种潜在的磷回收方案(PR1-PR3:鸟粪石、活钙石和处理过的污泥)和相应的当前方案(CT1-CT3和CF)。结果表明,PR1和PR2对环境的影响小于当前情景,而PR3对大多数情景的影响较大。PR3的净成本最低(内部成本和效益总和,每公斤磷肥39.1-54.7元),而PR2的外部成本最低(每公斤磷肥366.8元)。从污水污泥中回收1公斤磷肥的生产和土地利用社会成本(例如,PR1的约527元)远高于磷肥化肥的社会成本(CF的约20元)。然而,考虑到当前治疗的成本(例如,CT1治疗约524元人民币),P恢复方案的社会成本接近或略低于当前方案。在三种磷回收方案中,我们发现鸟粪石作为磷肥的回收具有最高的社会可行性。本研究将为改善污水污泥管理提供有价值的信息,并有助于促进中国磷的可持续供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Environmental sustainability opportunity and socio-economic cost analyses of phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge

Environmental sustainability opportunity and socio-economic cost analyses of phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge

Although phosphorus (P) recovery and management from sewage sludge are practiced in North America and Europe, such practices are not yet to be implemented in China. Here, we evaluated the environmental sustainability opportunity and socio-economic costs of recovering P from sewage sludge by replacing the current-day treatments (CT; sludge treatment and landfill) and P chemical fertilizer application (CF) in China using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods. Three potential P recovery scenarios (PR1‒PR3: struvite, vivianite, and treated sludge) and corresponding current-day scenarios (CT1‒CT3 and CF) were considered. Results indicated that PR1 and PR2 have smaller environmental impacts than the current-day scenarios, whereas PR3 has larger impacts in most categories. PR3 has the lowest net costs (sum of internal costs and benefits, 39.1–54.7 CNY per kg P), whereas PR2 has the lowest external costs (366.8 CNY per kg P). Societal costs for production and land use of 1 kg P by P recovery from sewage sludge (e.g., ∼527 CNY for PR1) are much higher than those of P chemical fertilizers (∼20 CNY for CF). However, considering the costs in the current-day treatments (e.g., ∼524 CNY for CT1), societal costs of P recovery scenarios are close to or slightly lower than those of current-day scenarios. Among the three P recovery scenarios, we found that recovering struvite as P fertilizer has the highest societal feasibility. This study will provide valuable information for improved sewage sludge management and will help promote the sustainable supply of P in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
6.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Ecotechnology (ESE) is an international, open-access journal publishing original research in environmental science, engineering, ecotechnology, and related fields. Authors publishing in ESE can immediately, permanently, and freely share their work. They have license options and retain copyright. Published by Elsevier, ESE is co-organized by the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信