肯尼亚马查科斯县小农条件下绿克和鸽豆的产量

J. Wambua, M. Ngigi, M. Lutta
{"title":"肯尼亚马查科斯县小农条件下绿克和鸽豆的产量","authors":"J. Wambua, M. Ngigi, M. Lutta","doi":"10.1080/00128325.2017.1346903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Green grams and pigeonpeas have multiple benefits to the rural poor as food security, fodder for livestock and fuel for small-scale farmers, despite low smallholder yields in Kenya. However, little is known about the factors between different farmers that influence the yields of green grams and pigeonpeas. The objectives of this study therefore were to describe and compare how the groups of farmers in agro-ecological zones (AEZs) LM 4 and LM 5 differ by their yields of green grams and pigeonpeas and to estimate the parameters of the variables which explain the yields. Data collection was through a well-structured questionnaire, administered to 364 respondents, selected through a multi-stage sampling technique. Each AEZ had an equal sample size (182 respondents). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression were used during data analysis. The ANOVA results showed that the mean of the green gram yields in AEZs LM 4 and LM 5 was 19.90 and 173.67 kg ha−1 while the mean of the pigeonpea yields was 109.26 and 34.01 kg ha−1, respectively. The multiple linear regression model results showed that the green gram yields were positively related to the use of improved seed (p = 0.001), cultivated farm sizes (p = 0.011), green gram crop intensity (p = 0.005), oxcart (p = 0.003) and agro-ecological zone (p = 0.000). The farmer differences in the use of improved seed were found to be significantly and positively related to the yields of pigeonpeas (p = 0.057), while the sizes of the cultivated farms (p = 0.057) and the agro-ecological zones (p = 0.000) showed inverse relationships (IRs). Based on the given research evidence, it was therefore concluded that the groups of farmers in AEZs LM 4 and LM 5 have different yields of green grams and pigeonpeas and there are factor gaps in productivity.","PeriodicalId":11421,"journal":{"name":"East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal","volume":" 3","pages":"117 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yields of Green Grams and Pigeonpeas under Smallholder Conditions in Machakos County, Kenya\",\"authors\":\"J. Wambua, M. Ngigi, M. Lutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00128325.2017.1346903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Green grams and pigeonpeas have multiple benefits to the rural poor as food security, fodder for livestock and fuel for small-scale farmers, despite low smallholder yields in Kenya. However, little is known about the factors between different farmers that influence the yields of green grams and pigeonpeas. The objectives of this study therefore were to describe and compare how the groups of farmers in agro-ecological zones (AEZs) LM 4 and LM 5 differ by their yields of green grams and pigeonpeas and to estimate the parameters of the variables which explain the yields. Data collection was through a well-structured questionnaire, administered to 364 respondents, selected through a multi-stage sampling technique. Each AEZ had an equal sample size (182 respondents). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression were used during data analysis. The ANOVA results showed that the mean of the green gram yields in AEZs LM 4 and LM 5 was 19.90 and 173.67 kg ha−1 while the mean of the pigeonpea yields was 109.26 and 34.01 kg ha−1, respectively. The multiple linear regression model results showed that the green gram yields were positively related to the use of improved seed (p = 0.001), cultivated farm sizes (p = 0.011), green gram crop intensity (p = 0.005), oxcart (p = 0.003) and agro-ecological zone (p = 0.000). The farmer differences in the use of improved seed were found to be significantly and positively related to the yields of pigeonpeas (p = 0.057), while the sizes of the cultivated farms (p = 0.057) and the agro-ecological zones (p = 0.000) showed inverse relationships (IRs). Based on the given research evidence, it was therefore concluded that the groups of farmers in AEZs LM 4 and LM 5 have different yields of green grams and pigeonpeas and there are factor gaps in productivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"117 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.2017.1346903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.2017.1346903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管肯尼亚小农的产量很低,但绿色克豆和鸽子豆作为粮食安全、牲畜饲料和小农燃料,对农村贫困人口有多重好处。然而,人们对不同农民之间影响绿克豆和鸽豆产量的因素知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是描述和比较农业生态区(aez) lm4和lm5的农民群体在绿克和鸽豆产量方面的差异,并估计解释产量的变量参数。数据收集是通过一份结构良好的问卷,对364名受访者进行管理,通过多阶段抽样技术选择。每个经济特区的样本量相等(182名受访者)。数据分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和多元线性回归。方差分析结果表明,绿豆4号和5号的平均产量分别为19.90和173.67 kg ha - 1,鸽豆的平均产量分别为109.26和34.01 kg ha - 1。多元线性回归模型结果表明,绿克产量与改良种子的使用(p = 0.001)、耕地规模(p = 0.011)、绿克种植强度(p = 0.005)、牛车(p = 0.003)和农业生态区(p = 0.000)呈正相关。农户使用改良种子的差异与鸽豆产量呈显著正相关(p = 0.057),而耕地规模(p = 0.057)与农业生态区(p = 0.000)呈负相关(ir)。综上所述,综上所述,经济区4号和5号农民群体的绿克和鸽豆产量不同,生产率存在要素差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Yields of Green Grams and Pigeonpeas under Smallholder Conditions in Machakos County, Kenya
ABSTRACT Green grams and pigeonpeas have multiple benefits to the rural poor as food security, fodder for livestock and fuel for small-scale farmers, despite low smallholder yields in Kenya. However, little is known about the factors between different farmers that influence the yields of green grams and pigeonpeas. The objectives of this study therefore were to describe and compare how the groups of farmers in agro-ecological zones (AEZs) LM 4 and LM 5 differ by their yields of green grams and pigeonpeas and to estimate the parameters of the variables which explain the yields. Data collection was through a well-structured questionnaire, administered to 364 respondents, selected through a multi-stage sampling technique. Each AEZ had an equal sample size (182 respondents). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression were used during data analysis. The ANOVA results showed that the mean of the green gram yields in AEZs LM 4 and LM 5 was 19.90 and 173.67 kg ha−1 while the mean of the pigeonpea yields was 109.26 and 34.01 kg ha−1, respectively. The multiple linear regression model results showed that the green gram yields were positively related to the use of improved seed (p = 0.001), cultivated farm sizes (p = 0.011), green gram crop intensity (p = 0.005), oxcart (p = 0.003) and agro-ecological zone (p = 0.000). The farmer differences in the use of improved seed were found to be significantly and positively related to the yields of pigeonpeas (p = 0.057), while the sizes of the cultivated farms (p = 0.057) and the agro-ecological zones (p = 0.000) showed inverse relationships (IRs). Based on the given research evidence, it was therefore concluded that the groups of farmers in AEZs LM 4 and LM 5 have different yields of green grams and pigeonpeas and there are factor gaps in productivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信