注射和口服抗葡萄球菌β -内酰胺类药物在MSSA中的MIC差异。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Brandy N Hernandez, Thomas Dilworth, Jacob Kesner, Keenan Ryan, Haedi Thelen, Renée-Claude Mercier
{"title":"注射和口服抗葡萄球菌β -内酰胺类药物在MSSA中的MIC差异。","authors":"Brandy N Hernandez,&nbsp;Thomas Dilworth,&nbsp;Jacob Kesner,&nbsp;Keenan Ryan,&nbsp;Haedi Thelen,&nbsp;Renée-Claude Mercier","doi":"10.1159/000526630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent evidence has shown that oral antibiotic therapy is not inferior to IV antibiotic therapy in the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus infections. Therefore, oral antibiotic therapy is now frequently prescribed in clinical practice due to cost benefit, ease of administration, decreased complication rate, and lack of need for IV access. In vitro susceptibility testing for β-lactam oral antibiotics is not routinely performed as the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommend using oxacillin and cefoxitin as surrogate markers. Hence, oral antibiotic susceptibilities for cephalexin and dicloxacillin are not reported and implied based on oxacillin and cefoxitin. The objective of the current study was to determine whether susceptibilities among S. aureus isolates are predictable when comparing commonly used IV and oral beta-lactams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cefazolin, cephalexin, dicloxacillin, and oxacillin broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 100 clinical isolates of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus by broth microdilution following CLSI guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among these isolates, median MICs for cephalexin were eight-fold higher than cefazolin MICs and median MICs for dicloxacillin were four-fold less than oxacillin MICs. Ten percent of more strains studied had a major or very major error in its susceptibility reporting when cephalexin was compared to its surrogate marker oxacillin.</p><p><strong>Discussions/conclusions: </strong>The variations in MICs observed compounded with the dosing and pharmacokinetic differences of oral versus IV β-lactam suggests that establishing breakpoints for oral β-lactam antibiotics is necessary to ensure adequate therapy is selected for the treatment of complex S. aureus infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MIC Discrepancies between Parenteral and Oral Anti-Staphylococcal Beta-Lactams among MSSA.\",\"authors\":\"Brandy N Hernandez,&nbsp;Thomas Dilworth,&nbsp;Jacob Kesner,&nbsp;Keenan Ryan,&nbsp;Haedi Thelen,&nbsp;Renée-Claude Mercier\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000526630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent evidence has shown that oral antibiotic therapy is not inferior to IV antibiotic therapy in the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus infections. Therefore, oral antibiotic therapy is now frequently prescribed in clinical practice due to cost benefit, ease of administration, decreased complication rate, and lack of need for IV access. In vitro susceptibility testing for β-lactam oral antibiotics is not routinely performed as the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommend using oxacillin and cefoxitin as surrogate markers. Hence, oral antibiotic susceptibilities for cephalexin and dicloxacillin are not reported and implied based on oxacillin and cefoxitin. The objective of the current study was to determine whether susceptibilities among S. aureus isolates are predictable when comparing commonly used IV and oral beta-lactams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cefazolin, cephalexin, dicloxacillin, and oxacillin broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 100 clinical isolates of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus by broth microdilution following CLSI guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among these isolates, median MICs for cephalexin were eight-fold higher than cefazolin MICs and median MICs for dicloxacillin were four-fold less than oxacillin MICs. Ten percent of more strains studied had a major or very major error in its susceptibility reporting when cephalexin was compared to its surrogate marker oxacillin.</p><p><strong>Discussions/conclusions: </strong>The variations in MICs observed compounded with the dosing and pharmacokinetic differences of oral versus IV β-lactam suggests that establishing breakpoints for oral β-lactam antibiotics is necessary to ensure adequate therapy is selected for the treatment of complex S. aureus infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:最近的证据表明,口服抗生素治疗并不亚于静脉抗生素治疗在治疗复杂的金黄色葡萄球菌感染。因此,由于成本效益、易于给药、并发症发生率降低以及不需要静脉注射,口服抗生素治疗现在在临床实践中经常被开处方。由于临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)推荐使用奥西林和头孢西丁作为替代标记物,所以β-内酰胺类口服抗生素的体外药敏试验并没有常规进行。因此,头孢西林和双氯西林的口服抗生素敏感性没有报道,也没有基于肟西林和头孢西丁的暗示。当前研究的目的是确定在比较常用的静脉注射和口服β -内酰胺时,金黄色葡萄球菌分离株的敏感性是否可预测。方法:采用微量肉汤稀释法测定头孢唑林、头孢氨苄、双氯西林和肟西林对临床分离的100株甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的最低抑制浓度(mic)。结果:在这些分离株中,头孢氨苄的中位mic比头孢唑林高8倍,双氯西林的中位mic比奥西林低4倍。当将头孢氨苄与其替代标记物奥西林进行比较时,10%以上的研究菌株在其敏感性报告中存在重大或非常重大的错误。讨论/结论:观察到的mic变化,加上口服β-内酰胺与静脉注射β-内酰胺的剂量和药代动力学差异,表明有必要建立口服β-内酰胺抗生素的断点,以确保选择适当的治疗方法来治疗复杂的金黄色葡萄球菌感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MIC Discrepancies between Parenteral and Oral Anti-Staphylococcal Beta-Lactams among MSSA.

Introduction: Recent evidence has shown that oral antibiotic therapy is not inferior to IV antibiotic therapy in the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus infections. Therefore, oral antibiotic therapy is now frequently prescribed in clinical practice due to cost benefit, ease of administration, decreased complication rate, and lack of need for IV access. In vitro susceptibility testing for β-lactam oral antibiotics is not routinely performed as the guidelines provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommend using oxacillin and cefoxitin as surrogate markers. Hence, oral antibiotic susceptibilities for cephalexin and dicloxacillin are not reported and implied based on oxacillin and cefoxitin. The objective of the current study was to determine whether susceptibilities among S. aureus isolates are predictable when comparing commonly used IV and oral beta-lactams.

Methods: Cefazolin, cephalexin, dicloxacillin, and oxacillin broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 100 clinical isolates of methicillin-sensitive S. aureus by broth microdilution following CLSI guidelines.

Results: Among these isolates, median MICs for cephalexin were eight-fold higher than cefazolin MICs and median MICs for dicloxacillin were four-fold less than oxacillin MICs. Ten percent of more strains studied had a major or very major error in its susceptibility reporting when cephalexin was compared to its surrogate marker oxacillin.

Discussions/conclusions: The variations in MICs observed compounded with the dosing and pharmacokinetic differences of oral versus IV β-lactam suggests that establishing breakpoints for oral β-lactam antibiotics is necessary to ensure adequate therapy is selected for the treatment of complex S. aureus infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信