颗粒活性炭、离子交换和替代吸附剂去除全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质的中试规模比较

Ricardo Medina, Manmeet W. Pannu, Scott A. Grieco, Michael Hwang, Christine Pham, Megan H. Plumlee
{"title":"颗粒活性炭、离子交换和替代吸附剂去除全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质的中试规模比较","authors":"Ricardo Medina,&nbsp;Manmeet W. Pannu,&nbsp;Scott A. Grieco,&nbsp;Michael Hwang,&nbsp;Christine Pham,&nbsp;Megan H. Plumlee","doi":"10.1002/aws2.1308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eight granular activated carbons (GAC), four anion exchange (IX) resins, and two alternative adsorbents (AAs) were tested for the removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from a groundwater source used for drinking water. The study was conducted using pilot(meter)-scale columns operated in continuous-flow mode for 16–26 months. Comparison between GAC adsorbents showed that bituminous GACs exhibited higher adsorption than non-/sub-bituminous GACs. Testing of a reactivated and new GAC showed no significant differences with respect to PFAS adsorption. Of the four IX resins tested, one resin showed superior adsorption when compared with all three IX resins. A surface-modified bentonite adsorbent showed superior removal efficiencies over all adsorbent types tested here. These results provide benchmark performance and adsorption capacities at pilot-scale for various adsorbents and highlight the promise of AAs to remove PFAS from water sources with low (ng/L) concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://awwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aws2.1308","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot-scale comparison of granular activated carbons, ion exchange, and alternative adsorbents for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances removal\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Medina,&nbsp;Manmeet W. Pannu,&nbsp;Scott A. Grieco,&nbsp;Michael Hwang,&nbsp;Christine Pham,&nbsp;Megan H. Plumlee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aws2.1308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Eight granular activated carbons (GAC), four anion exchange (IX) resins, and two alternative adsorbents (AAs) were tested for the removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from a groundwater source used for drinking water. The study was conducted using pilot(meter)-scale columns operated in continuous-flow mode for 16–26 months. Comparison between GAC adsorbents showed that bituminous GACs exhibited higher adsorption than non-/sub-bituminous GACs. Testing of a reactivated and new GAC showed no significant differences with respect to PFAS adsorption. Of the four IX resins tested, one resin showed superior adsorption when compared with all three IX resins. A surface-modified bentonite adsorbent showed superior removal efficiencies over all adsorbent types tested here. These results provide benchmark performance and adsorption capacities at pilot-scale for various adsorbents and highlight the promise of AAs to remove PFAS from water sources with low (ng/L) concentrations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AWWA water science\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://awwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aws2.1308\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AWWA water science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aws2.1308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AWWA water science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aws2.1308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

采用八种颗粒活性炭(GAC)、四种阴离子交换树脂(IX)和两种替代吸附剂(AAs)对饮用水地下水中全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的去除效果进行了测试。该研究使用中试(米)规模的色谱柱在连续流模式下运行了16-26个月。对GAC吸附剂的比较表明,沥青GAC比非/亚沥青GAC具有更高的吸附性。重新活化的GAC和新的GAC的测试显示,在PFAS吸附方面没有显著差异。在所测试的四种IX树脂中,一种树脂的吸附性能优于三种IX树脂。一种表面改性的膨润土吸附剂在所有类型的吸附剂中表现出优越的去除效率。这些结果为各种吸附剂提供了中试规模的基准性能和吸附能力,并突出了AAs从低浓度(ng/L)水源中去除PFAS的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pilot-scale comparison of granular activated carbons, ion exchange, and alternative adsorbents for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances removal

Pilot-scale comparison of granular activated carbons, ion exchange, and alternative adsorbents for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances removal

Eight granular activated carbons (GAC), four anion exchange (IX) resins, and two alternative adsorbents (AAs) were tested for the removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from a groundwater source used for drinking water. The study was conducted using pilot(meter)-scale columns operated in continuous-flow mode for 16–26 months. Comparison between GAC adsorbents showed that bituminous GACs exhibited higher adsorption than non-/sub-bituminous GACs. Testing of a reactivated and new GAC showed no significant differences with respect to PFAS adsorption. Of the four IX resins tested, one resin showed superior adsorption when compared with all three IX resins. A surface-modified bentonite adsorbent showed superior removal efficiencies over all adsorbent types tested here. These results provide benchmark performance and adsorption capacities at pilot-scale for various adsorbents and highlight the promise of AAs to remove PFAS from water sources with low (ng/L) concentrations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信