通过支链DNA和逆转录偶联聚合酶链反应测定方法定量人类免疫缺陷病毒血浆RNA:准确性和可重复性的关键评估

J Todd, T Yeghiazarian, B Hoo, J Detmer, J Kolberg, R White, J Wilber, M Urdea
{"title":"通过支链DNA和逆转录偶联聚合酶链反应测定方法定量人类免疫缺陷病毒血浆RNA:准确性和可重复性的关键评估","authors":"J Todd,&nbsp;T Yeghiazarian,&nbsp;B Hoo,&nbsp;J Detmer,&nbsp;J Kolberg,&nbsp;R White,&nbsp;J Wilber,&nbsp;M Urdea","doi":"10.1016/0888-0786(94)90039-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study was designed to evaluate the utility of two assays, reverse transcription coupled polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and branched DNA (bDNA), to accurately and reproducibly quantitate plasma human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA levels. The bDNA assay quantitated RNA transcripts, prepared from different HIV-1 subtypes (A-E), within 1.5-fold. Similarly, the bDNA assay, standardized to subtype B, was used to quantitate cultured isolates from subtypes A, C-F within 2-fold; however, the RT-PCR assay displayed a 904-fold range. Reproducibility studies demonstrated that the bDNA and RT-PCR assays could be used statistically (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) to discern less than 2- and 6.8 – 8.1-fold changes in RNA levels, respectively. This study showed that the two assay methods differ in accuracy and reproducibility. These differences need to be considered when choosing specific applications for the methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101161,"journal":{"name":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 233-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0888-0786(94)90039-6","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus plasma RNA by branched DNA and reverse transcription coupled polymerase chain reaction assay methods: A critical evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility\",\"authors\":\"J Todd,&nbsp;T Yeghiazarian,&nbsp;B Hoo,&nbsp;J Detmer,&nbsp;J Kolberg,&nbsp;R White,&nbsp;J Wilber,&nbsp;M Urdea\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0888-0786(94)90039-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study was designed to evaluate the utility of two assays, reverse transcription coupled polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and branched DNA (bDNA), to accurately and reproducibly quantitate plasma human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA levels. The bDNA assay quantitated RNA transcripts, prepared from different HIV-1 subtypes (A-E), within 1.5-fold. Similarly, the bDNA assay, standardized to subtype B, was used to quantitate cultured isolates from subtypes A, C-F within 2-fold; however, the RT-PCR assay displayed a 904-fold range. Reproducibility studies demonstrated that the bDNA and RT-PCR assays could be used statistically (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) to discern less than 2- and 6.8 – 8.1-fold changes in RNA levels, respectively. This study showed that the two assay methods differ in accuracy and reproducibility. These differences need to be considered when choosing specific applications for the methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 233-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0888-0786(94)90039-6\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0888078694900396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0888078694900396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

本研究旨在评估逆转录偶联聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)和支链DNA (bDNA)两种检测方法在准确、可重复地定量血浆人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV) RNA水平方面的实用性。bDNA测定定量了不同HIV-1亚型(A-E)制备的RNA转录物,在1.5倍内。同样,标准化为B亚型的bDNA测定法用于定量培养的A、C-F亚型分离物的2倍;然而,RT-PCR检测显示了904倍的范围。可重复性研究表明,bDNA和RT-PCR检测可以在统计学上(P<0.05)分别识别出小于2倍和6.8 - 8.1倍的RNA水平变化。本研究表明,两种测定方法在准确性和重现性上存在差异。在选择这些方法的具体应用时,需要考虑这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus plasma RNA by branched DNA and reverse transcription coupled polymerase chain reaction assay methods: A critical evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility

The present study was designed to evaluate the utility of two assays, reverse transcription coupled polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and branched DNA (bDNA), to accurately and reproducibly quantitate plasma human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA levels. The bDNA assay quantitated RNA transcripts, prepared from different HIV-1 subtypes (A-E), within 1.5-fold. Similarly, the bDNA assay, standardized to subtype B, was used to quantitate cultured isolates from subtypes A, C-F within 2-fold; however, the RT-PCR assay displayed a 904-fold range. Reproducibility studies demonstrated that the bDNA and RT-PCR assays could be used statistically (P<0.05) to discern less than 2- and 6.8 – 8.1-fold changes in RNA levels, respectively. This study showed that the two assay methods differ in accuracy and reproducibility. These differences need to be considered when choosing specific applications for the methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信