来自BJOG外部的见解

A. Kent, S. Kirtley
{"title":"来自BJOG外部的见解","authors":"A. Kent, S. Kirtley","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.16713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As estrogen levels fall through the menopause transition, women may experience physical changes to their genitalia and these can be accompanied by symptoms such as the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), vaginal laxity, urinary incontinence or dyspareunia. For these symptoms – specifically GSM – topical estrogen therapy is prescribed. Estradiol vaginal tablets (10 μg) are well tolerated and effective in terms of subjective and objective criteria giving symptomatic relief and improving cytological indicators but it is not clear whether early or late initiation of therapy is more effective. To explore the dilemma an analysis was carried out of a randomised trial in which some women were treated “early” – that is before the age of 60 years and some were treated “late” – starting after the age of 60 years, and their reactions evaluated (Derzko et al. Menopause 2021;28:113–8). It transpires that the earlier therapy starts, the more effective it is. In the words of the researchers “The stronger response observed in younger women supports current clinical recommendations to start treatment early. Continued treatment may be important to avoid recurrence of vaginal atrophy.” These findings of a more rapid and robust response to early treatment beg the question as to whether low-dose vaginal estrogen should not have wider application even in those with mild symptoms, reaching almost a preventative role? (Phillips & Bachmann. Menopause 2021;28:109–10). It is well-known that many women “put-up with” early bothersome vaginal symptoms for reasons of embarrassment or in the belief it is part of a natural process, and the outcomes of low-dose estrogen vaginal tablet therapy suggest this amounts to an opportunity lost in improving the woman’s chances of avoiding symptoms later that could be less amenable to simple treatment. Given the ubiquitous nature of the problem, is it not time for a placebo controlled trial assessing the quality of life (including sexual function/dysfunction) of healthy women through the menopause transition in terms of prophylactic topical estrogen therapy? Since sex is best as a dual pursuit, why not ask the women’s partners what they think? It would be refreshing to hear the men’s view (or the woman’s female partner). Or is that too avant-garde?","PeriodicalId":8984,"journal":{"name":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights from outside BJOG\",\"authors\":\"A. Kent, S. Kirtley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.16713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As estrogen levels fall through the menopause transition, women may experience physical changes to their genitalia and these can be accompanied by symptoms such as the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), vaginal laxity, urinary incontinence or dyspareunia. For these symptoms – specifically GSM – topical estrogen therapy is prescribed. Estradiol vaginal tablets (10 μg) are well tolerated and effective in terms of subjective and objective criteria giving symptomatic relief and improving cytological indicators but it is not clear whether early or late initiation of therapy is more effective. To explore the dilemma an analysis was carried out of a randomised trial in which some women were treated “early” – that is before the age of 60 years and some were treated “late” – starting after the age of 60 years, and their reactions evaluated (Derzko et al. Menopause 2021;28:113–8). It transpires that the earlier therapy starts, the more effective it is. In the words of the researchers “The stronger response observed in younger women supports current clinical recommendations to start treatment early. Continued treatment may be important to avoid recurrence of vaginal atrophy.” These findings of a more rapid and robust response to early treatment beg the question as to whether low-dose vaginal estrogen should not have wider application even in those with mild symptoms, reaching almost a preventative role? (Phillips & Bachmann. Menopause 2021;28:109–10). It is well-known that many women “put-up with” early bothersome vaginal symptoms for reasons of embarrassment or in the belief it is part of a natural process, and the outcomes of low-dose estrogen vaginal tablet therapy suggest this amounts to an opportunity lost in improving the woman’s chances of avoiding symptoms later that could be less amenable to simple treatment. Given the ubiquitous nature of the problem, is it not time for a placebo controlled trial assessing the quality of life (including sexual function/dysfunction) of healthy women through the menopause transition in terms of prophylactic topical estrogen therapy? Since sex is best as a dual pursuit, why not ask the women’s partners what they think? It would be refreshing to hear the men’s view (or the woman’s female partner). Or is that too avant-garde?\",\"PeriodicalId\":8984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着绝经期雌激素水平的下降,女性可能会经历生殖器的生理变化,这些变化可能伴随着更年期泌尿生殖系统综合征(GSM)、阴道松弛、尿失禁或性交困难等症状。对于这些症状-特别是GSM -局部雌激素治疗的规定。从主客观标准来看,雌二醇阴道片(10 μg)具有良好的耐受性和有效性,可缓解症状并改善细胞学指标,但尚不清楚早期或晚期开始治疗更有效。为了探究这一困境,我们对一项随机试验进行了分析,其中一些女性在60岁之前接受了“早期”治疗,而一些则在60岁之后接受了“晚期”治疗,并对她们的反应进行了评估(Derzko等人)。更年期2021;28:113-8)。显然,越早开始治疗,效果越好。用研究人员的话来说,“在年轻女性中观察到的更强的反应支持了目前的临床建议,即尽早开始治疗。”持续治疗对于避免阴道萎缩复发可能很重要。”这些对早期治疗的更快速和更有力的反应的发现回避了一个问题,即低剂量阴道雌激素是否应该在那些症状轻微的患者中得到更广泛的应用,达到几乎预防的作用?菲利普斯和巴赫曼。更年期2021;28:109-10)。众所周知,许多女性“忍受”早期令人烦恼的阴道症状是出于尴尬的原因,或者认为这是自然过程的一部分,而低剂量雌激素阴道片剂治疗的结果表明,这相当于失去了提高女性避免后期症状的机会,而这些症状可能不太适合简单的治疗。考虑到这个问题的普遍性,是不是应该进行一项安慰剂对照试验,以预防性局部雌激素治疗来评估健康女性在绝经过渡期的生活质量(包括性功能/功能障碍)?既然性是最好的双重追求,为什么不问问女性的伴侣是怎么想的呢?听听男性(或女性伴侣)的看法会让人耳目一新。还是说这太前卫了?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights from outside BJOG
As estrogen levels fall through the menopause transition, women may experience physical changes to their genitalia and these can be accompanied by symptoms such as the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), vaginal laxity, urinary incontinence or dyspareunia. For these symptoms – specifically GSM – topical estrogen therapy is prescribed. Estradiol vaginal tablets (10 μg) are well tolerated and effective in terms of subjective and objective criteria giving symptomatic relief and improving cytological indicators but it is not clear whether early or late initiation of therapy is more effective. To explore the dilemma an analysis was carried out of a randomised trial in which some women were treated “early” – that is before the age of 60 years and some were treated “late” – starting after the age of 60 years, and their reactions evaluated (Derzko et al. Menopause 2021;28:113–8). It transpires that the earlier therapy starts, the more effective it is. In the words of the researchers “The stronger response observed in younger women supports current clinical recommendations to start treatment early. Continued treatment may be important to avoid recurrence of vaginal atrophy.” These findings of a more rapid and robust response to early treatment beg the question as to whether low-dose vaginal estrogen should not have wider application even in those with mild symptoms, reaching almost a preventative role? (Phillips & Bachmann. Menopause 2021;28:109–10). It is well-known that many women “put-up with” early bothersome vaginal symptoms for reasons of embarrassment or in the belief it is part of a natural process, and the outcomes of low-dose estrogen vaginal tablet therapy suggest this amounts to an opportunity lost in improving the woman’s chances of avoiding symptoms later that could be less amenable to simple treatment. Given the ubiquitous nature of the problem, is it not time for a placebo controlled trial assessing the quality of life (including sexual function/dysfunction) of healthy women through the menopause transition in terms of prophylactic topical estrogen therapy? Since sex is best as a dual pursuit, why not ask the women’s partners what they think? It would be refreshing to hear the men’s view (or the woman’s female partner). Or is that too avant-garde?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信