物理治疗干预腕管综合征的疗效:叙述性回顾

Christina Tservinioti, Evgenia Trevlaki, A. Chalkia, Emmanouil Trevlakis
{"title":"物理治疗干预腕管综合征的疗效:叙述性回顾","authors":"Christina Tservinioti, Evgenia Trevlaki, A. Chalkia, Emmanouil Trevlakis","doi":"10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i2e.3389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : The medical condition known as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurs when the median nerve at the wrist joint is being compressed and is the most frequent form of nerve entrapment-related peripheral neuropathy. The purpose of the present review was to examine the evidence that was available on the clinical benefits of various treatments for CTS. Method : Electronic research was conducted in Google Scholar, Pub Med, and Springer Link, in English and Greek language. Randomized controlled studies in either English or Greek language were included in the review, and there was no limitation to the publication date. The trials were required to focus on CTS and include the use of physical therapy, electrotherapy, or rehabilitation as key interventions. Results : 10 studies each comparing a different treatment modality with either a control or alternative treatment, conducted by various authors, and published in different journals were included. The studies evaluated the performance of radial shock wave therapy, pulsed radiofrequency, interferential current therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, high-intensity Laser, low-level laser therapy, manual therapy, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy. The primary outcomes assessed in the studies were pain, electrophysiological parameters, and functional improvement. Conclusions : The implementation of a physiotherapy program appears to be advantageous to the rehabilitation of CTS patients. Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency, radial shock wave therapy, interferential current therapy, and Laser therapy were associated with greater improvement in symptoms than TENS. Manual Therapy techniques have a greater impact on pain reduction and patients’ functional capacity when compared to all the above electrotherapy approaches.","PeriodicalId":14302,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of physical therapy interventions in carpal tunnel syndrome: A narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Christina Tservinioti, Evgenia Trevlaki, A. Chalkia, Emmanouil Trevlakis\",\"doi\":\"10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i2e.3389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : The medical condition known as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurs when the median nerve at the wrist joint is being compressed and is the most frequent form of nerve entrapment-related peripheral neuropathy. The purpose of the present review was to examine the evidence that was available on the clinical benefits of various treatments for CTS. Method : Electronic research was conducted in Google Scholar, Pub Med, and Springer Link, in English and Greek language. Randomized controlled studies in either English or Greek language were included in the review, and there was no limitation to the publication date. The trials were required to focus on CTS and include the use of physical therapy, electrotherapy, or rehabilitation as key interventions. Results : 10 studies each comparing a different treatment modality with either a control or alternative treatment, conducted by various authors, and published in different journals were included. The studies evaluated the performance of radial shock wave therapy, pulsed radiofrequency, interferential current therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, high-intensity Laser, low-level laser therapy, manual therapy, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy. The primary outcomes assessed in the studies were pain, electrophysiological parameters, and functional improvement. Conclusions : The implementation of a physiotherapy program appears to be advantageous to the rehabilitation of CTS patients. Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency, radial shock wave therapy, interferential current therapy, and Laser therapy were associated with greater improvement in symptoms than TENS. Manual Therapy techniques have a greater impact on pain reduction and patients’ functional capacity when compared to all the above electrotherapy approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i2e.3389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i2e.3389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医学上称为腕管综合征(carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)的情况发生在腕关节的正中神经受到压迫时,是神经卡压相关周围神经病变最常见的形式。本综述的目的是检查各种治疗CTS的临床益处的证据。方法:谷歌Scholar、Pub Med、施普林格Link以英文和希腊文进行电子研究。本综述纳入了英语或希腊语的随机对照研究,并且对发表日期没有限制。试验需要集中在CTS上,包括使用物理治疗、电疗或康复作为主要干预措施。结果:纳入了10项研究,每项研究比较了不同的治疗方式与对照或替代治疗,这些研究由不同的作者进行,发表在不同的期刊上。这些研究评估了放射冲击波治疗、脉冲射频、干扰电流治疗、经皮神经电刺激、高强度激光、低水平激光治疗、手动治疗和体外冲击波治疗的效果。研究中评估的主要结果是疼痛、电生理参数和功能改善。结论:物理治疗方案的实施似乎有利于CTS患者的康复。超声引导的脉冲射频、径向冲击波治疗、干扰电流治疗和激光治疗与TENS相比,症状改善更大。与上述所有电疗方法相比,手工疗法技术对减轻疼痛和患者的功能能力有更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of physical therapy interventions in carpal tunnel syndrome: A narrative review
Background : The medical condition known as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurs when the median nerve at the wrist joint is being compressed and is the most frequent form of nerve entrapment-related peripheral neuropathy. The purpose of the present review was to examine the evidence that was available on the clinical benefits of various treatments for CTS. Method : Electronic research was conducted in Google Scholar, Pub Med, and Springer Link, in English and Greek language. Randomized controlled studies in either English or Greek language were included in the review, and there was no limitation to the publication date. The trials were required to focus on CTS and include the use of physical therapy, electrotherapy, or rehabilitation as key interventions. Results : 10 studies each comparing a different treatment modality with either a control or alternative treatment, conducted by various authors, and published in different journals were included. The studies evaluated the performance of radial shock wave therapy, pulsed radiofrequency, interferential current therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, high-intensity Laser, low-level laser therapy, manual therapy, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy. The primary outcomes assessed in the studies were pain, electrophysiological parameters, and functional improvement. Conclusions : The implementation of a physiotherapy program appears to be advantageous to the rehabilitation of CTS patients. Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency, radial shock wave therapy, interferential current therapy, and Laser therapy were associated with greater improvement in symptoms than TENS. Manual Therapy techniques have a greater impact on pain reduction and patients’ functional capacity when compared to all the above electrotherapy approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信