利用自调电压电平电路降低纳米级静态CMOS VLSI倍增电路的待机泄漏功率

Deeprose Subedi
{"title":"利用自调电压电平电路降低纳米级静态CMOS VLSI倍增电路的待机泄漏功率","authors":"Deeprose Subedi","doi":"10.5121/VLSIC.2012.3501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we performed the comparative analysis of stand-by leakage (when the circuit is idle), delay and dynamic power (when the circuit switches) of the three different parallel digital multiplier circuits implemented with two adder modules and Self Adjustable Voltage level circuit (SVL). The adder modules chosen were 28 transistor-conventional CMOS adder and 10 transistorStatic Energy Recovery CMOS adder (SERF) circuits. The multiplier modules chosen were 4Bits Array, 4bits Carry Save and 4Bits Baugh Wooley multipliers. At first, the circuits were simulated with adder modules without applying the SVL circuit. And secondly, SVL circuit was incorporated in the adder modules for simulation. In all the multiplier architectures chosen, less standby leakage power was observed being consumed by the SERF adder based multipliers applied with SVL circuit. The stand-by leakage power dissipation is 1.16μwatts in Bits array multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVL vs. 1.39μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit. It is 1.16μwatts in Carry Save multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVL vs. 1.4μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit. It is 1.67μwatts in Baugh Wooley multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVl circuit vs. 2.74μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit.","PeriodicalId":74899,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on VLSI Circuits : [proceedings]. Symposium on VLSI Circuits","volume":"48 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stand by Leakage Power Reduction in Nanoscale Static CMOS VLSI Multiplier Circuits Using Self Adjustable Voltage Level Circuit\",\"authors\":\"Deeprose Subedi\",\"doi\":\"10.5121/VLSIC.2012.3501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we performed the comparative analysis of stand-by leakage (when the circuit is idle), delay and dynamic power (when the circuit switches) of the three different parallel digital multiplier circuits implemented with two adder modules and Self Adjustable Voltage level circuit (SVL). The adder modules chosen were 28 transistor-conventional CMOS adder and 10 transistorStatic Energy Recovery CMOS adder (SERF) circuits. The multiplier modules chosen were 4Bits Array, 4bits Carry Save and 4Bits Baugh Wooley multipliers. At first, the circuits were simulated with adder modules without applying the SVL circuit. And secondly, SVL circuit was incorporated in the adder modules for simulation. In all the multiplier architectures chosen, less standby leakage power was observed being consumed by the SERF adder based multipliers applied with SVL circuit. The stand-by leakage power dissipation is 1.16μwatts in Bits array multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVL vs. 1.39μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit. It is 1.16μwatts in Carry Save multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVL vs. 1.4μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit. It is 1.67μwatts in Baugh Wooley multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVl circuit vs. 2.74μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Symposium on VLSI Circuits : [proceedings]. Symposium on VLSI Circuits\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Symposium on VLSI Circuits : [proceedings]. Symposium on VLSI Circuits\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5121/VLSIC.2012.3501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on VLSI Circuits : [proceedings]. Symposium on VLSI Circuits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5121/VLSIC.2012.3501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在本文中,我们对采用两个加法器模块和自调电压电平电路(SVL)实现的三种不同并联数字乘法器电路的待机漏电(电路空闲时)、延迟和动态功率(电路开关时)进行了比较分析。所选加法器模块为28个晶体管-传统CMOS加法器和10个晶体管静态能量恢复CMOS加法器(SERF)电路。选择的乘法器模块有4Bits Array、4Bits Carry Save和4Bits Baugh Wooley乘法器。首先,在不使用SVL电路的情况下,使用加法器模块对电路进行仿真。其次,在加法器模块中加入SVL电路进行仿真。在所有选择的乘法器结构中,观察到使用SVL电路的基于SERF加法器的乘法器消耗较少的待机泄漏功率。采用SERF加法器的Bits阵列乘法器的待机泄漏功耗为1.16μwatts,而采用SVL电路的CMOS 28T加法器的待机泄漏功耗为1.39μwatts。采用SERF加法器的进位保存乘法器的功率为1.16μ瓦,而采用SVL电路的CMOS 28T加法器的进位保存乘法器功率为1.4μ瓦。采用SVl电路的SERF加法器的Baugh Wooley乘法器功率为1.67μ瓦,而采用SVl电路的CMOS 28T加法器功率为2.74μ瓦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stand by Leakage Power Reduction in Nanoscale Static CMOS VLSI Multiplier Circuits Using Self Adjustable Voltage Level Circuit
In this paper, we performed the comparative analysis of stand-by leakage (when the circuit is idle), delay and dynamic power (when the circuit switches) of the three different parallel digital multiplier circuits implemented with two adder modules and Self Adjustable Voltage level circuit (SVL). The adder modules chosen were 28 transistor-conventional CMOS adder and 10 transistorStatic Energy Recovery CMOS adder (SERF) circuits. The multiplier modules chosen were 4Bits Array, 4bits Carry Save and 4Bits Baugh Wooley multipliers. At first, the circuits were simulated with adder modules without applying the SVL circuit. And secondly, SVL circuit was incorporated in the adder modules for simulation. In all the multiplier architectures chosen, less standby leakage power was observed being consumed by the SERF adder based multipliers applied with SVL circuit. The stand-by leakage power dissipation is 1.16μwatts in Bits array multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVL vs. 1.39μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit. It is 1.16μwatts in Carry Save multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVL vs. 1.4μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit. It is 1.67μwatts in Baugh Wooley multiplier with SERF Adder applied with SVl circuit vs. 2.74μwatts in the same multiplier with CMOS 28T Adder applied with SVL circuit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信